-200

[gordon gekko]

What % chance does a -200 favorite have to win?

[RickySteve]

You're going to make LT's head explode.

[AgainstAllOdds]

Gordy...if I recall, I believe there was already a thread on this. Try the search feature...but If I remember correctly, they are supposed to win 7-8/10

[HedgeHog]

This needs to be in the Think Tank? Obviously you need 66.7% to break even, and your actual win % is probably a few percentage points less depending on the sport and juice.

[durito]

it's no wonder mccain is pulling ahead

[AgainstAllOdds]

it's no wonder mccain is pulling ahead

Hey Durito...A guys asking a legit question and you have to come add your idiotic comments to it.

Quality post dude

[durito]

you seem like a smart guy aao, you should be able to figure out what 2 divided by 3 is

[gordon gekko]

I know it's 67%, I asked the question to prove a point to somebody.

[donjuan]

What % chance does a -200 favorite have to win?

I know it's 67%, I asked the question to prove a point to somebody.

There is a difference between breakeven and post-vig.

[gordon gekko]

There is a difference between breakeven and post-vig.

break even at 67%.

[LT Profits]

break even at 67%.

Yes 67% would be BE, but -200 favorites are not expected to win 67% of the time unless it is a no vig line. To properly answer the original question, one would need to know the line set in order to determine the no-vig line.

[louisvillekid]

Richkas will probably say 100% of the time, "Chalk is Lock baby!"