Sorry if this has been covered here before.
This weekend I bet on BC -165. I didn't want to lay -3.5 -110 for fear that they would win by a FG. My question is was it worth it to lay -165 and avoid the possibility of having a FG cost me the cover, or was it dumb not to bet on the -3.5?
What is the better bet in this situation??
This weekend I bet on BC -165. I didn't want to lay -3.5 -110 for fear that they would win by a FG. My question is was it worth it to lay -165 and avoid the possibility of having a FG cost me the cover, or was it dumb not to bet on the -3.5?
What is the better bet in this situation??