Lentz Vs. Oliveira Fight SBR Book Decision

[Rod_M]

In light of the official overturn of the the Nick Lentz Vs. Charles Oliveira fight, we use this opportunity to let our user base know that SBR Sportsbook will stick to the original decision and will not be regrading/cancelling any bets whether winners or losers.

Rod.

[joesomebody114]

Can a regular book do that? What would happen in this case, if some of the winners already withdrew their winnings at a real book?

[Rod_M]

That is pretty much the reason why most of the industry and SBR will stick to the original decision, it would mess up balances that have already been settled for the week. Kind of a Solomonic decision.

[RollPlayer]

When I clicked the thread title I was hoping that you would stick to the original decision (I dont have pts on either side). Changing this would open the door to changing other things, such as fixed matches and teams with ineligible players

[SportSharpener]

Its the Standard move to stick to the original decision. an illegal blow affecting the outcome is a risk we all take with every wager. A lot of jones/hamill bettors felt the pain

[JohnGalt2341]

I had some money on Lentz at JustBet and Legends. Is there pretty much Zero chance that I can get it refunded?

[SBR Lou]

Its the Standard move to stick to the original decision.

Correct, the SBR Sportsbook is adhering to the applicable industry standard.

[illmatick]

ROD or LOu, are you lazy fuks gonna put up a contest for tomorrow's UFC event. It's been a while since you've done one, ROD.

Same rules as usual, 500 or 1000 points to the winner.

[Vaughany]

hahah lazy fuks!

[Kaladarus]

ROD or LOu, are you lazy fuks gonna put up a contest for tomorrow's UFC event. It's been a while since you've done one, ROD.

Same rules as usual, 500 or 1000 points to the winner.

bump