Originally posted by brooks85
McGregor skip lightweight belt altogether. Go straight for Welterweight belt UFC 200?
Collapse
X
-
VaughanySBR Aristocracy
- 03-07-10
- 45563
#36Comment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#37time will tellComment -
bjpenn85SBR Hall of Famer
- 02-17-11
- 5059
#38Originally posted by Vaughanynot necessarily. FLoyd Mayweather has amazing head movement doesnt he. And if he decided he wanted to throw-down for once and just have a brawl in his next fight that wouldnt mean he suddenly has no head movement. It is all about choice.
Plus its not all about head movement, aside from footwork and angles, judging distance and timing are just as important and there are none better at that than ConorComment -
VaughanySBR Aristocracy
- 03-07-10
- 45563
#39yeah, at the end of the day he has that innate Irish brawler mentality in him though! No matter how technical and skilled you are that will always come out in some way I guessComment -
mirinquadsSBR MVP
- 04-22-13
- 3927
#40Originally posted by bjpenn85Brooks has a point though Miri and Josh. Conor gets hit ALL THE TIME, but he doesnt care. He just walk right through it. But, because he walks right through shots, he still got bad head movement. A good chin doesnt give you good head movement, what the hell is this kind of low life logic?
I do think Conor eats lawler for lunch. All day. Lawler is a garbage, he has lost three fight in a row now against better strikers, good luck beating conor. Good f luck.
He will be fighting more this way when going back up the weightclasses, because he knows he will have the speed and agility advantage back up there.
Just because a fighter doesnt fight a certain way, doesn't mean he doesnt have the capability to do so. Especially one as diverse as Conor.Comment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#41Originally posted by VaughanyOk that may well be right. But there is no guarantee Conor would fight like that against Lawlor. He and Kavanagh are not stupid
can you understand why that isn't a good bet? just curious if you understand you're not handicapping, you're hoping in that scenario.Comment -
VaughanySBR Aristocracy
- 03-07-10
- 45563
#42Originally posted by brooks85so you're going to place a bet on a guy to fight completely different than he has before against a guy who is one of the best at landing shots?
can you understand why that isn't a good bet? just curious if you understand you're not handicapping, you're hoping in that scenario.Comment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#43Originally posted by Vaughanywhere did I say I was going to place a bet on him?! we dont even know the line yet do we?!! lolComment -
VaughanySBR Aristocracy
- 03-07-10
- 45563
#44Originally posted by brooks85good idea to backtrackComment -
getlucky2winSBR MVP
- 01-14-12
- 1121
#45i would bet lawler -420Comment -
bjpenn85SBR Hall of Famer
- 02-17-11
- 5059
#46Originally posted by getlucky2wini would bet lawler -420Comment -
mirinquadsSBR MVP
- 04-22-13
- 3927
#47Originally posted by Vaughanylol again, where did I say I would bet on him? you dont even know the line yet you are talking about betting on him! You realise betting on somebody at Evens is different to betting on somebody at -200 right?! Would you bet on Robbie if he was Evens and if he was -300?Comment -
PaperTrail07SBR Posting Legend
- 08-29-08
- 20423
#48Lets not forget he went to decision w HollowayComment -
JoshKnows46SBR MVP
- 07-27-12
- 3691
#49Originally posted by PaperTrail07Lets not forget he went to decision w HollowayComment -
bjpenn85SBR Hall of Famer
- 02-17-11
- 5059
#50Originally posted by PaperTrail07Lets not forget he went to decision w HollowayComment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#51Originally posted by Vaughanylol again, where did I say I would bet on him? you dont even know the line yet you are talking about betting on him! You realise betting on somebody at Evens is different to betting on somebody at -200 right?! Would you bet on Robbie if he was Evens and if he was -300?
yeah I wonder what the line could be? so many possibilities... hell conor would be anything from -1000 to +1000 huh?
haha I forgot how ridiculous you areComment -
VaughanySBR Aristocracy
- 03-07-10
- 45563
#52Originally posted by brooks85lol keep peddling
yeah I wonder what the line could be? so many possibilities... hell conor would be anything from -1000 to +1000 huh?
haha I forgot how ridiculous you areComment -
VaughanySBR Aristocracy
- 03-07-10
- 45563
#53Originally posted by mirinquadsV, please don't argue Brooks like he's an actual human being. He's not worth the taps on your keyboard. He's like Luca fury crossed with Ron Paul, Broke, autistic and not even animals want to go near him.
I dont get why he is so arrogant and thinks he has some kind of God-like knowledge of MMA... he must forget that I was on here when he was posting his plays then suddenly stopped because he absolutely tanked on the Canchez/Kampmann card and then came up with the excuse of ''i've lost the will to post anymore'' as to why he wasnt posting plays anymore!
No brah, you just spunked your bankroll! Dont be scared to admit homie!!Comment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#54Originally posted by Vaughanydo you have some kind of disorder where you can't answer questions?! Im not backtracking on anything, my point is still the same. Once again, show me where I said that I'd bet him?
that is why the -1000 to +1000 thing is so funny because the range obviously is not that wide now is it?
you're either going to bet conor in this fight or you're going to bet lawler. The line isn't going to change your pick unless you just want to take the underdog which would then bring up the point you obviously have no read on the fight.
so back to where we started and your comment about conor and his coach not being stupid. If you bet conor you're betting on him fighting completely different than he has before. No reason to over complicate this v, using your words.Comment -
VaughanySBR Aristocracy
- 03-07-10
- 45563
#55well obviously the line range isnt going to be that wide (you are the one who said that by the way!). And yes the line would change my pick, for example if I think Conor wins 55% of the time Im not going to bet him if he is worse than -125...it's very simple mathematics. I think Rivera beats Pickett more often not but I won't be betting on him this Saturday because I don't think he wins as often as the odds imply. I really shouldnt be having to explain basics like this!
Betting on him fighting completely different than he has before?!! You haven't seen Conor fight before UFC have you brah?!Comment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#56Originally posted by Vaughanywell obviously the line range isnt going to be that wide (you are the one who said that by the way!). And yes the line would change my pick, for example if I think Conor wins 55% of the time Im not going to bet him if he is worse than -125...it's very simple mathematics. I think Rivera beats Pickett more often not but I won't be betting on him this Saturday because I don't think he wins as often as the odds imply. I really shouldnt be having to explain basics like this!
Betting on him fighting completely different than he has before?!! You haven't seen Conor fight before UFC have you brah?!
so there is no reason for you to say "conor and his coach are not stupid" because that has no weight on how you place a bet. You just admitted it; technicals.Comment -
JoshKnows46SBR MVP
- 07-27-12
- 3691
#57Originally posted by brooks85it is. Thanks for admitting you have no read on the fight and are betting purely based on technicals(look it up because I imagine you will need to).
so there is no reason for you to say "conor and his coach are not stupid" because that has no weight on how you place a bet. You just admitted it; technicals.Comment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#58Originally posted by JoshKnows46Lol u make me sick, i technically feel my brain cells bursting with each post of yours I read, don't you have a sheep to be fuckin, please give up forming opinions or give up posting them....mcgregor will finish lawlar, line will be about +185 mcgregor, and I would lay upwards to -230 mcgregor. Gonna be easy money. no need to type anything more, ufc 200 will be here soon enough.
oh good we have the unbiased input from josh... lol poor thing. Careful with those brain cells josh, we both know you don't have many left. Remember the brain is a muscle too, it is not too late for you.Comment -
JoshKnows46SBR MVP
- 07-27-12
- 3691
#59Originally posted by brooks85oh good we have the unbiased input from josh... lol poor thing. Careful with those brain cells josh, we both know you don't have many left. Remember the brain is a muscle too, it is not too late for you.Comment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#60Originally posted by JoshKnows46Dont get in your own way, just bet what I bet, andI'll change your bum life.
lol I saw how much you make betting. Reminds me of the fun I have with fantasy sports...Comment -
JoshKnows46SBR MVP
- 07-27-12
- 3691
#61Originally posted by brooks85lol I saw how much make betting. Reminds me of the fun I have with fantasy sports...Comment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#62Originally posted by JoshKnows46Go all in with your pizza points on mcgregor vs lawlar
lol curious though because you don't know the history but some friendly advice; did you know using the term "pizza points" around here is mocking some ex-posters? Mainly "MD" and his buttbuddy who I can't remember his name... edge of my tongue tho... some silly hot-tub buying, pizza addicted clown... christ what was his name?
oh yea "nuyahbidness" there we go. That clown lolComment -
mirinquadsSBR MVP
- 04-22-13
- 3927
#63Originally posted by JoshKnows46Go all in with your pizza points on mcgregor vs lawlar
#rekt, #slekt, #dekt.
The only term pizza points is mocking is you Brooks. As you're a broke pizzaboy. You see the correlations?Comment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#64lol I see the butt-buddy brigade sent out their emergency signal for help
Originally posted by mirinquads10/10
#rekt, #slekt, #dekt.
The only term pizza points is mocking is you Brooks. As you're a broke pizzaboy. You see the correlations?
poor miri, stuck in the forest stillComment -
VaughanySBR Aristocracy
- 03-07-10
- 45563
#65Originally posted by brooks85it is. Thanks for admitting you have no read on the fight and are betting purely based on technicals(look it up because I imagine you will need to).
so there is no reason for you to say "conor and his coach are not stupid" because that has no weight on how you place a bet. You just admitted it; technicals.
Hopeless, just like your betting thread!!Comment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#66Originally posted by Vaughanylol of course it has weight, what are talking about! Doesnt mean I will automatically bet on Mcgregor no matter what the line is. If you understood this you might not of been throwing hundreds on friggin Chris Tuscherer against Mark Hunt and tanking!!
Hopeless, just like your betting thread!!
you bet on technicals, do you even know what that means? I doubt it but I'm sure you can understand why that is comical to me; your ignorance. And now you're panicking by bringing up past bets lol. You're too predictable vaughany. You said some stupid stuff, got called out on it; relax. It is not the end of the world and your cred around here has already been cemented as clown so nothing to worry about.Comment -
VaughanySBR Aristocracy
- 03-07-10
- 45563
#67lol you are literally just like Nate Diaz! its worrying
''you are on steroids''
''your teammates were on steroids''
''penetrate you, you are on steroids''!!!Comment -
mirinquadsSBR MVP
- 04-22-13
- 3927
#68Originally posted by Vaughanylol of course it has weight, what are talking about! Doesnt mean I will automatically bet on Mcgregor no matter what the line is. If you understood this you might not of been throwing hundreds on friggin Chris Tuscherer at -260 against Mark Hunt and tanking!!
Hopeless, just like your betting thread!!I guess that's what happens when you live off catfood mainly, rofl
Comment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#69^I've been talking about something I don't eat for 2 years?
lol logic and the facts never side with you do they miri?
Originally posted by Vaughanylol you are literally just like Nate Diaz! its worrying
''you are on steroids''
''your teammates were on steroids''
''penetrate you, you are on steroids''!!!
you're panicking because it is clear you really don't know what you're talking about. Nothing is going to change that. You bet on technicals and you didn't even know you did ... lolComment -
VaughanySBR Aristocracy
- 03-07-10
- 45563
#70lol keep betting on Chris Tuscherer at -260, Nate!
Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code