UFC 195: Lawler vs. Condit (January 02, 2016)

**JoshKnows46** · 01-03-16, 12:34 AM

Absolute bullshit

**NYGMen09** · 01-03-16, 12:35 AM

Lawler ml huge winner!
2-0

**GoodSun** · 01-03-16, 12:35 AM

penetrating judges. lawler didn't do jack shit to deserve the win but a few good punches here and there and that last round burst and that was it, condit was the better fighter. anyways good picks joshknows45, you know your shit.

**Killer_Demo** · 01-03-16, 12:35 AM

What a fight. That 5th was straight phonebooth brawling. The rematch needs to be booked. I must see 5 more rounds from these 2 again wow.

**Sykes** · 01-03-16, 12:36 AM

Originally posted by bjpenn85

When you have 3-4 questionable decisions, you need to continue go for the split dec prop! All those judges should loose their job, unreal.

What was the questionable ones? I think the Russian won despite the leg. So that was dodgey. And think Condit won that one. What was the others?

**GoBlue77** · 01-03-16, 12:36 AM

4-0 day for me. sorry fellas. id feel the same but I've been on the other end as well. UFC judges man...

**rabun** · 01-03-16, 12:37 AM

penetrate me - Lawler

What fight where those judges watching at worst it was 3-2 Carlos

**slayer14** · 01-03-16, 12:37 AM

Carlos dominated 3 rounds the other 2 rounds where debatable 50 50 how can he lose fight seems like rigged to me

**KalouKalou** · 01-03-16, 12:37 AM

Originally posted by sykes

what was the questionable ones? I think the russian won despite the leg. So that was dodgey. And think condit won that one. What was the others?

nokeeeeeeeeeeeeee

**Sykes** · 01-03-16, 12:39 AM

Originally posted by JoshKnows46

Absolute bullshit

Im in Brazil watching on Combate, can change to english, but his name has escaped me -- goldburg. The other guy not Joe, saying Condit has landed more than Lawler has thrown at the end of the 3rd. No stats showing though. Gotta just accept that the 5th round of that fight was fuking brilliant taking bets out of it.

**Sykes** · 01-03-16, 12:40 AM

I actually bet the other guy + points so im biased with this one but I honestly think he lost that fight. Was close but he got beat up a bit, had what 2 mins on top and not much else.

**Sykes** · 01-03-16, 12:41 AM

Originally posted by Sykes

I actually bet the other guy + points so im biased with this one but I honestly think he lost that fight. Was close but he got beat up a bit, had what 2 mins on top and not much else.

reply to the nokeeeeeeeeeeeeee one.

**TPowell** · 01-03-16, 12:44 AM

Guys, there are bad decisions and THEN there are what happened here. This is the worst I ever remember. A monkey looking at stats on the computer could have told you how this fight went. I'm sure \*\*\*\*\*\* ass Dana White will say how great this fight was and look over the judges. The exact opposite he did when Hendricks wrestlefucked him twice and White cried like a schoolgirl after the first fight didn't go Lawler's way. Suck a penetrating dick Robbie and Dana

**mirinquads** · 01-03-16, 12:45 AM

Same guys that always whine about fighters winning because they are throwing at strikes that miss whine about Condit losing that decision

Can't make it up

**blazes_bff** · 01-03-16, 12:46 AM

Yep, that was a robbery.
Live betting between rounds says it all.
after round 1. condit -225. Lawler +175
after round 2. condit +100. Lawler -130
after round 3. condit -110. Lawler -120
After round 4. Condit -375. Lawler +285

**TPowell** · 01-03-16, 12:47 AM

Originally posted by mirinquads

Same guys that always whine about fighters winning because they are throwing at strikes that miss whine about Condit losing that decision

Can't make it up

Makes sense, Condit landed more penetrating sig strikes in the last round than Robbie did in the whole damn fight

**bjpenn85** · 01-03-16, 12:47 AM

Originally posted by Sykes

What was the questionable ones? I think the Russian won despite the leg. So that was dodgey. And think Condit won that one. What was the others?

Tanaka won eeeeeasily that fight, 1 and 2. but last the third, then split, which was wrong. The other was Noke, it wasnt necessarily a robbery, but it gives you a indication that the judges are off. And the show continues, Larkin do have some success but jesus, clear 30-27, but hey, split again. Obviously if it goes to decision in the main event, which we knew at least on paper, and it did, and AGAIN, the judges overlook the fact that Condit won almost every round except the 5th, but this time, it doesnt really come as a shock, if you ever watched the event.

This happens frequently in ufc, if the judges fakk up on 2-3 prelims, they will continue to do so the rest of the event. An idiots an idiot.

**slayer14** · 01-03-16, 12:48 AM

Lawler going to have regrets in life

**brooks85** · 01-03-16, 12:48 AM

condit won that fight

**Sykes** · 01-03-16, 12:48 AM

Originally posted by mirinquads

Same guys that always whine about fighters winning because they are throwing at strikes that miss whine about Condit losing that decision

Can't make it up

Who do you think won bud? For me was a Condit fight, he was the better guy but then im not scoring 10-9 rounds that matter.

**Kermit** · 01-03-16, 12:49 AM

Originally posted by brooks85

condit won that fight

Big-time

I could only give Lawler one round

**TPowell** · 01-03-16, 12:52 AM

Condit nearly doubled Lawler up in sig strikes in the 5th round...

**mirinquads** · 01-03-16, 12:53 AM

Originally posted by Sykes

Who do you think won bud? For me was a Condit fight, he was the better guy but then im not scoring 10-9 rounds that matter.

Fell a sleep, so I have no clue

Just wanted to fk with y'all, I had Condit too.

**GoBlue77** · 01-03-16, 12:53 AM

savage

**TPowell** · 01-03-16, 12:55 AM

Originally posted by GoBlue77

savage

thats a rare photo there. Nearly 3 times as likely to have a picture of a Condit shot landing

**slayer14** · 01-03-16, 12:56 AM

Originally posted by GoBlue77

savage

What is the point of this picture you posted

**Sykes** · 01-03-16, 12:59 AM

Originally posted by bjpenn85

Tanaka won eeeeeasily that fight, 1 and 2. but last the third, then split, which was wrong. The other was Noke, it wasnt necessarily a robbery, but it gives you a indication that the judges are off. And the show continues, Larkin do have some success but jesus, clear 30-27, but hey, split again. Obviously if it goes to decision in the main event, which we knew at least on paper, and it did, and AGAIN, the judges overlook the fact that Condit won almost every round except the 5th, but this time, it doesnt really come as a shock, if you ever watched the eve

This happens frequently in ufc, if the judges fakk up on 2-3 prelims, they will continue to do so the rest of the event. An idiots an idiot.

I actually do notice this. You seem to always have an idiot Judge when you have dodgy decisions. I dont see much talk on here about handicap bets. I bet Kish -pts ( I think that was dodgy but it won) I bet vs Noke on the + handicap and it won, I dont think that was dodgy. The two for me are the Russian and the Main. I think the Russian won 2/1 and the main Condit just done better. But there lies my problem, I look at the fight its all blended together, a judge scores after every round.

I dont honestly think they can fix the judges, I reckon people on the outside can. Like the last proper fix I seen was the guy against Gonzaga. He just on purpose lost that fight. That was a 'fixed' fight not by the UFC, Gonzaga but by that Russian guy. IMO of course.

**Sykes** · 01-03-16, 01:00 AM

Originally posted by mirinquads

Fell a sleep, so I have no clue

Just wanted to fk with y'all, I had Condit too.

You missed the best round of fighting this year so

**DeathAdder** · 01-03-16, 01:02 AM

Only people crying over the decision are the poor saps who bet on Condit. Sorry that you lost money but you gotta beat the champ convincingly to be the champ. If Condit wanted the belt he should have finished Lawler, plain & simple. I remember all the butthurt people who thought Hendricks beat GSP.

**terpkeg** · 01-03-16, 01:02 AM

Originally posted by blazes_bff

Yep, that was a robbery.
Live betting between rounds says it all.
after round 1. condit -225. Lawler +175
after round 2. condit +100. Lawler -130
after round 3. condit -110. Lawler -120
After round 4. Condit -375. Lawler +285

I think you are being facetious, but numbers show not a bad decision in many people opinions. Although I thought -110 after rd 3 was soft and hit that.

**TPowell** · 01-03-16, 01:04 AM

Originally posted by DeathAdder

Only people crying over the decision are the poor saps who bet on Condit. Sorry that you lost money but you gotta beat the champ convincingly to be the champ. If Condit wanted the belt he should have finished Lawler, plain & simple. I remember all the butthurt people who thought Hendricks beat GSP.

you are a grade penetrating a moron

**Kermit** · 01-03-16, 01:17 AM

Originally posted by DeathAdder

Only people crying over the decision are the poor saps who bet on Condit. Sorry that you lost money but you gotta beat the champ convincingly to be the champ. If Condit wanted the belt he should have finished Lawler, plain & simple. I remember all the butthurt people who thought Hendricks beat GSP.

Even the UFC commenters on tv right now know that Carlos got fukked.

**Kermit** · 01-03-16, 01:19 AM

**Pinocchio** · 01-03-16, 01:23 AM

What happened? Where is my money?

I bet Condit by decision and Condit won - by decision.

Let's double check:

Round 1 - Condit (more active & Lawler down)
Strikes:
Lawler 12 of 18 - 66%,
Condit 28 of 75 - 37%

Round 2 - Lawler (less volume, but had a knockdown, seals it for me)
Strikes:
Lawler 10 of 23 - 43%
Condit 17 of 71 - 23%

Round 3 - Condit (both rather inactive, gotta go with Condit on volume and variety)
Strikes:
Lawler 11 of 26 - 42%
Condit 22 of 78 - 28%

Round 4 - all Condit
Strikes:
Lawler 6 of 18 - 33%
Condit 47 of 98 - 47%

Round 5 - Lawler (less volume, but more damage inflicted, can't argue against him)
Strikes:
Lawler 53 of 92 - 57%
Condit 62 of 173 - 35%

Overall: 3-2 Condit (48-47).

I suspect everyone knew that Condit won, including the judges - I mean how stupid can they be, really? They deliberately gave it to Lawler... I've seen similar bullshit in the past and I expect it in the future. That's how these bozos (UFC) stay in business; controversy, extra attention/media exposure, additional rematches...

Well, here you go:

**bjpenn85** · 01-03-16, 01:37 AM

Originally posted by DeathAdder

Only people crying over the decision are the poor saps who bet on Condit. Sorry that you lost money but you gotta beat the champ convincingly to be the champ. If Condit wanted the belt he should have finished Lawler, plain & simple. I remember all the butthurt people who thought Hendricks beat GSP.

I won like 4-500 dollar on lawler split dec. i actually cheered for Condit when they read from the judges score cards .He did every thing he needed to do, and life fakked him. Its not fair. You dont need to beat no one more than Condit did. He almost finished Lawler several times, actually i believe near three times in three different rounds, and outclassing him by landing more than double the amount of strikes. Youre certified crazy or trolling, hard to tell over forums like these...