As you may have noticed, the forum was offline for a period. We identified a security incident to Sportsbook Review Forum and took the site offline as a containment step while we investigated.
We wanted to make sure the system and site were restored and secured before bringing things back online and you will see that we are requiring all forum users to reset their password as a precautionary step.
If you have any questions, our moderators are around and happy to help where they can.
Will Rockhold vs Machida finally ruin hog analysis?
Will Rockhold vs Machida finally ruin hog analysis?
Lets face it folks, based on hog analysis I cap Rockhold at about -350, but I have my doubts here for the first time ever. Might this be the time that hog analysis is finally trumped by a higher power?
Discuss.
TheCalculator
SBR MVP
10-10-11
1683
#2
You're right.
Based on what we know of Rockholds hog. He should be the GOAT.
If he loses will it kill our fundamental winning angle?
Comment
Sanity Check
SBR Posting Legend
03-30-13
10973
#3
I have Rockhold nearer to -150.
Machida could be the favorite depending on how things go.
Comment
Sacrelicious
SBR Hall of Famer
11-29-12
5984
#4
Originally posted by TheCalculator
You're right.
Based on what we know of Rockholds hog. He should be the GOAT.
If he loses will it kill our fundamental winning angle?
This is a system breaking fight. If Rockhold loses I will have to reconsider my entire betting strategy.
Comment
marzwoody
SBR MVP
01-03-14
3902
#5
Originally posted by Sacrelicious
This is a system breaking fight. If Rockhold loses I will have to reconsider my entire betting strategy.
Please do.
Comment
Sacrelicious
SBR Hall of Famer
11-29-12
5984
#6
That's enough, Marzwoody.
Comment
Sacrelicious
SBR Hall of Famer
11-29-12
5984
#7
I bet Machida has a larger hog than we give him credit for.
Comment
marzwoody
SBR MVP
01-03-14
3902
#8
Originally posted by Sacrelicious
That's enough, Marzwoody.
You seem like a normal guy in that phone call but then you put on this troll persona on here Lol i'm onto you.