UFC on FOX 10: Henderson Vs Thomson (January 25, 2014)
Collapse
X
-
SykesSBR MVP
- 06-23-12
- 2714
#561Comment -
marzwoodySBR MVP
- 01-03-14
- 3902
#562Yeah and some of these guys must feel like they taken a thousand d-icks when they lose that much money. i would rather bet not a lot of money for a worthwhile return than loads and feel like shit. what you guys looking to buy a sports car or something?Originally posted by cheeesesome of these guys actually have bankrollsComment -
Tommy BlingshyneSBR Wise Guy
- 12-11-12
- 821
#563fightmetric is horseshit...do they count how many times josh took bendos back?Originally posted by jacktheknifeTotal strikes 114 to 33 in favor of Bendo. Don't feel too bad, MD.Comment -
Tommy BlingshyneSBR Wise Guy
- 12-11-12
- 821
#564arguably beating the former champion w/ one hand wasnt good enough? is he retarded? (yes)Originally posted by jacktheknife"Thompson didn't do anything that would make people say 'we want to see Josh get a title fight again sometime soon'."
Bitch...?Comment -
cheeeseSBR Wise Guy
- 02-22-11
- 784
#565Maybe for coin flippers like yourself it is better. Some of these guys have the money and the conviction to play the edges and handle the swings. All of the information is here for you to learn and do for yourself but you're too narrow minded to believe that others might know more than you.Originally posted by marzwoodyYeah and some of these guys must feel like they taken a thousand d-icks when they lose that much money. i would rather bet not a lot of money for a worthwhile return than loads and feel like shit. what you guys looking to buy a sports car or something?
If you had any sense you would be reading everything you can and only posting questions. If you had any social skills you could build a positive reputation and start to reach out to the more knowledgeable posters. But you wont, you'll sit around and guess while others get better and grow their bankrolls to a point where it's -ev to have a job.Comment -
Tommy BlingshyneSBR Wise Guy
- 12-11-12
- 821
#566gotta be able to handle the swings if this is your chosen profession...this might just be your hobby but this very well could be the next guys livelihood...Originally posted by marzwoodyYeah and some of these guys must feel like they taken a thousand d-icks when they lose that much money. i would rather bet not a lot of money for a worthwhile return than loads and feel like shit. what you guys looking to buy a sports car or something?Comment -
marzwoodySBR MVP
- 01-03-14
- 3902
#567Who is a coin flipper??? i make bets based on my mma knowledge and risk / reward i'm 3-0 since i started betting. won on kawajiri, won on tavares, just won on wineland / cacares parley, i haven't lost a single pound, and made somewhere around £200 so how exactly am i losing in any shape or form? you silly f-ck. you have no idea who your talking to.Originally posted by cheeeseMaybe for coin flippers like yourself it is better. Some of these guys have the money and the conviction to play the edges and handle the swings. All of the information is here for you to learn and do for yourself but you're too narrow minded to believe that others might know more than you.
If you had any sense you would be reading everything you can and only posting questions. If you had any social skills you could build a positive reputation and start to reach out to the more knowledgeable posters. But you wont, you'll sit around and guess while others get better and grow their bankrolls to a point where it's -ev to have a job.Comment -
marzwoodySBR MVP
- 01-03-14
- 3902
#568Very true.Comment -
ibetkellybroSBR Sharp
- 12-30-13
- 347
#569starting to see why Benson's dad left him and his korean motherComment -
marzwoodySBR MVP
- 01-03-14
- 3902
#570Why would i always have to post questions? i read this regularly close to fights take in information etc, but listening to others without using your own brain is for losers. would have lost lots if i just listened to others without making my own decisions.Comment -
ibetkellybroSBR Sharp
- 12-30-13
- 347
#571the fact that you're killing it while i've been raped the last two cards confirms I am a good capper.Originally posted by marzwoodyWhy would i always have to post questions? i read this regularly close to fights take in information etc, but listening to others without using your own brain is for losers. would have lost lots if i just listened to others without making my own decisions.Comment -
MDSBR Hall of Famer
- 01-31-12
- 9728
#572Originally posted by marzwoodyWho is a coin flipper??? i make bets based on my mma knowledge and risk / reward i'm 3-0 since i started betting. won on kawajiri, won on tavares, just won on wineland / cacares parley, i haven't lost a single pound, and made somewhere around £200 so how exactly am i losing in any shape or form? you silly f-ck. you have no idea who your talking to.
Comment -
marzwoodySBR MVP
- 01-03-14
- 3902
#573Ha this is just a hobby / fun for me. its not like i'm telling anyone what to do with there money. whatever. no need to talk shit cheeese, assuming i'm some coin flipper because i don't bet thousands of pounds. maybe you should pay more attention to this forum bro.Comment -
marzwoodySBR MVP
- 01-03-14
- 3902
#574Am i being laughed at by the guy MD who just lost over 10k on thompson and argued with me for like 30 minutes about tavares winning? i might have to step away from the keyboard now before i lose my sanity...Comment -
marzwoodySBR MVP
- 01-03-14
- 3902
#575
Comment -
ibetkellybroSBR Sharp
- 12-30-13
- 347
#576no one will miss you, lose your password and never post againOriginally posted by marzwoodyAm i being laughed at by the guy MD who just lost over 10k on thompson and argued with me for like 30 minutes about tavares winning? i might have to step away from the keyboard now before i lose my sanity...Comment -
MDSBR Hall of Famer
- 01-31-12
- 9728
#577Yes.Originally posted by marzwoodyAm i being laughed at by the guy MD who just lost over 10k on thompson and argued with me for like 30 minutes about tavares winning?Comment -
Dwil125SBR MVP
- 11-08-12
- 2048
#578This ^^^Originally posted by ibetkellybrono one will miss you, lose your password and never post againComment -
marzwoodySBR MVP
- 01-03-14
- 3902
#579That's fine by me. i'm not exactly looking to be besties with strangers on a gambling forum.Originally posted by ibetkellybrono one will miss you, lose your password and never post again
Comment -
VaughanySBR Aristocracy
- 03-07-10
- 45563
#580Originally posted by ibetkellybrostarting to see why Benson's dad left him and his korean mother
Comment -
Thor4140SBR Posting Legend
- 02-09-08
- 22277
#581Same ole story here. Guys betting a live dog in a five round fight will never learn that if this goes to a decision and u have the dog u are gonna lose. Now if the odds were the other way around with Punk and almost three to one favorite the judges would give it to Punk cause most would be on Benson. Wash, rinse, repeat.Comment -
plekzSBR MVP
- 07-28-13
- 1491
#582Think Bensons stock dropped significantly with that fight and that Thomson increased his. Hope he keeps his hunger he can easily be a top 5 LW for a few more years still. I also hope they don't try and give Benson to Pettis now because i have ZERO intrest seeing Pettis handing Benson his ass yet again.
Cerrone v Benson or a Benson v Melendez 2 i think would be a wise choice by the UFC.
Och yeah, and that decision was horrible, super impressed with Thomson's groundgame especially considering he was doing it with one arm.Comment -
mmaedSBR MVP
- 11-25-11
- 1327
#583Damn you had 10k? Sorry bro. I don fault you for the bet. That line was offOriginally posted by MDYes.Comment -
MDSBR Hall of Famer
- 01-31-12
- 9728
#584More than that. Doesn't bother me any more, although I tilted for around two hours last night.Originally posted by mmaedDamn you had 10k? Sorry bro. I don fault you for the bet. That line was offComment -
KermitBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-27-10
- 32823
#585I was on Thompson and thought he lost 3 rounds. I was surprised one judge even had him winning. I mean I guess there was one round that could have been viewed by two judges and swung the outcome in the other direction due to their viewing position as cage-side, but I think the decision was right. Henderson out-struck Josh pretty decisively past the first round. If Josh had not injured his hand, he most likely would have done enough to win. It's a shame because he is getting up there in age and this loss and injury is a set-back for him.Originally posted by plekzThink Bensons stock dropped significantly with that fight and that Thomson increased his. Hope he keeps his hunger he can easily be a top 5 LW for a few more years still. I also hope they don't try and give Benson to Pettis now because i have ZERO intrest seeing Pettis handing Benson his ass yet again.
Cerrone v Benson or a Benson v Melendez 2 i think would be a wise choice by the UFC.
Och yeah, and that decision was horrible, super impressed with Thomson's groundgame especially considering he was doing it with one arm.Comment -
plekzSBR MVP
- 07-28-13
- 1491
#586mma is about ALOT more then ''striking'' though you aint watching K1.Comment -
Wanna Bet On It?SBR MVP
- 11-17-11
- 1032
#587Live bettors of GSP at +400 in R5 versus Hendricks would disagree with your conspiracy theory. And, for the record, Sal D'Amato, the same clown who scored it (49-46) for Bendo (as the big fav live) scored it for GSP (as the big dog live). If Sal was in on the whole books/judging conspiracy ring, (1) he would've ruled it for Hendricks OR (if you think that it was rigged for GSP because Hendricks was the +200 pre-fight dog) (2) the sportsbooks would've never given you +400 on GSP live if the judges/sportsbooks were in cahoots.Originally posted by Thor4140Same ole story here. Guys betting a live dog in a five round fight will never learn that if this goes to a decision and u have the dog u are gonna lose. Now if the odds were the other way around with Punk was almost a three to one favorite the judges would give it to Punk cause most would be on Benson. Wash, rinse, repeat.
Your conspiracy doesn't add up but then again everyone but me and you knew that and I'm dumb enough to waste 5 minutes of my life explaining why...Comment -
Thor4140SBR Posting Legend
- 02-09-08
- 22277
#588Here is the deal my gullible friend. LIve betting is such a small portion of betting okay. Hendricks was the betting publics bet on that fight and of course he as the decent size dog, lost the decision. Again proving my point. When i saw ur post and i believe it was you, where u took Punk by decision, i thought it was the dumbest bet on the site. If there was one bet out of all the bets on this card that had no shot at winning it was that one. Now if u would have took Punk inside five that would be the bet with Punk. Anything else he was losing the same way everyone loses against Bendo because they set the lines so people don't bet Bendo. I could hit u over the head with this point but im sure it would slide off time and time again. Again and let me stress this point. Unless ur fighter (the heavy dog)has a good shot at a knockout or a submission, in one of these big bet five rounders, or even some three rounders u can't win with corrupt judging who always are on the side of the bookies. The last time i took a dog like this it was three rounder when TJ Grant beat Maynard. Everyone had TJ but if that went to a decision he would have lost. Luckily he knocked him out but it was a risk i was willing to take. Keep trying tho. Im sure u will hit one of them eventually. The only dog that won was Davis over Machida and that is because there wasn't one guy betting Davis. That is when the dog is allowed to win. Again the dog wins in this fight but this time the bookies needed the dog. Understand now?Originally posted by Wanna Bet On It?Live bettors of GSP at +400 in R5 versus Hendricks would disagree with your conspiracy theory. And, for the record, Sal D'Amato, the same clown who scored it (49-46) for Bendo (as the big fav live) scored it for GSP (as the big dog live). If Sal was in on the whole books/judging conspiracy ring, (1) he would've ruled it for Hendricks OR (if you think that it was rigged for GSP because Hendricks was the +200 pre-fight dog) (2) the sportsbooks would've never given you +400 on GSP live if the judges/sportsbooks were in cahoots.
Your conspiracy doesn't add up but then again everyone but me and you knew that and I'm dumb enough to waste 5 minutes of my life explaining why...Comment -
NunyaBidnessSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-26-09
- 9345
#589Love that that wall of text is the 'edited version'.Comment -
Wanna Bet On It?SBR MVP
- 11-17-11
- 1032
#590Originally posted by Thor4140Here is the deal my gullible friend. LIve betting is such a small portion of betting okay. Hendricks was the betting publics bet on that fight and of course he as the decent size dog, lost the decision. Again proving my point. When i saw ur post and i believe it was you, where u took Punk by decision, i thought it was the dumbest bet on the site. If there was one bet out of all the bets on this card that had no shot at winning it was that one. Now if u would have took Punk inside five that would be the bet with Punk. Anything else he was losing the same way everyone loses against Bendo because they set the lines so people don't bet Bendo. I could hit u over the head with this point but im sure it would slide off time and time again. Again and let me stress this point. Unless ur fighter (the heavy dog)has a good shot at a knockout or a submission, in one of these big bet five rounders, or even some three rounders u can't win with corrupt judging who always are on the side of the bookies. The last time i took a dog like this it was three rounder when TJ Grant beat Maynard. Everyone had TJ but if that went to a decision he would have lost. Luckily he knocked him out but it was a risk i was willing to take. Keep trying tho. Im sure u will hit one of them eventually. The only dog that won was Davis over Machida and that is because there wasn't one guy betting Davis. That is when the dog is allowed to win. Again the dog wins in this fight but this time the bookies needed the dog. Understand now?
Don't you get tired of being wrong?
Comment -
VaughanySBR Aristocracy
- 03-07-10
- 45563
#591Benson has already beaten cerrone twice, if it was 1-1 im sure ufc would be up for itOriginally posted by plekzThink Bensons stock dropped significantly with that fight and that Thomson increased his. Hope he keeps his hunger he can easily be a top 5 LW for a few more years still. I also hope they don't try and give Benson to Pettis now because i have ZERO intrest seeing Pettis handing Benson his ass yet again.
Cerrone v Benson or a Benson v Melendez 2 i think would be a wise choice by the UFC.
Och yeah, and that decision was horrible, super impressed with Thomson's groundgame especially considering he was doing it with one arm.Comment -
VaughanySBR Aristocracy
- 03-07-10
- 45563
#592.....Comment -
VaughanySBR Aristocracy
- 03-07-10
- 45563
#593Hahah u dont count as a person tho, u are a superheroOriginally posted by Wanna Bet On It?
Don't you get tired of being wrong?
Comment -
shabangSBR MVP
- 02-23-13
- 1814
#594
another day, another dolla!
1/25/14 5:08pm $35.00 $502.17 $537.17 Win 8 Team Parlay Win 1/25/14 9:00pm UFC Fighting 1102 Stipe Miocic -255* vs Gabriel Gonzaga Win 1/25/14 7:30pm UFC Fighting 1401 Alex Caceres/Sergio Pettis Over 2½ -190* Win 1/25/14 7:00pm UFC Fighting 1502 Eddie Wineland -420* vs Yves Jabouin Win 1/25/14 6:00pm UFC Fighting 1701 Hugo Viana -330* vs Ramiro Hernandez Jr. Win 1/25/14 5:30pm UFC Fighting 1802 Daron Cruickshank -245* vs Mike Rio Win 1/25/14 9:30pm Props Fighting 1003 Thomson/Henderson goes 5 round distance -185* vs Fight won't go 5 round distance Win 1/25/14 6:30pm Props Fighting 1635 Camus/Meza starts round 3 -188* vs Fight won't start round 3 Win 1/25/14 5:00pm Props Fighting 1937 Rhodes/Sullivan starts round 2 -288* vs Fight won't start round 2 1/25/14 3:49pm $50.00 $418.53 $468.53 Win 6 Team Parlay Win 1/25/14 9:30pm UFC Fighting 1002 Benson Henderson -290* vs Josh Thomson Win 1/25/14 8:30pm UFC Fighting 1201 Donald Cerrone -175* vs Adriano Martins Win 1/25/14 8:00pm UFC Fighting 1301 Darren Elkins/Jeremy Stephens Over 1½ -205* Win 1/25/14 7:00pm UFC Fighting 1502 Eddie Wineland -325* vs Yves Jabouin Win 1/25/14 5:30pm UFC Fighting 1801 Mike Rio/Daron Cruickshank Over 1½ -180* Win 1/25/14 5:00pm UFC Fighting 1901 Mike Rhodes/George Sullivan Over 1½ -215*
Comment -
Thor4140SBR Posting Legend
- 02-09-08
- 22277
#595Proves absolutely nothing. I bet u are salivating to bet Faber by decision. Another bet that has no chance to win. Faber doesn't get the finish Faber is finished.Originally posted by Wanna Bet On It?
Don't you get tired of being wrong?
Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
