Originally posted by MD
bellator 10/11 thread
Collapse
X
-
OracleAdamSBR Hustler- 09-28-13
- 63
#36No, I don't have Fox Sports where I'm living now, so I wasn't able to see the Silva/Hamill fight, just read the play by plays.Comment -
MDSBR Hall of Famer
- 01-31-12
- 9728
#37Silva is one of the most inconsistent fighters in the UFC and shouldn't be -800 against anyone.Originally posted by OracleAdamNo, I don't have Fox Sports where I'm living now, so I wasn't able to see the Silva/Hamill fight, just read the play by plays.Comment -
OracleAdamSBR Hustler- 09-28-13
- 63
#38He seems pretty consistent to me. He lost to Machida when Machida was at his best. He lost to Evans when he was at his best, and Gustaffson, and easily dispatched everyone else. Was he at risk of losing to Hamill ever in the fight?Originally posted by MDSilva is one of the most inconsistent fighters in the UFC and shouldn't be -800 against anyone.Comment -
MDSBR Hall of Famer
- 01-31-12
- 9728
#39My new favourite poster.Originally posted by OracleAdamHe seems pretty consistent to me. He lost to Machida when Machida was at his best. He lost to Evans when he was at his best, and Gustaffson, and easily dispatched everyone else. Was he at risk of losing to Hamill ever in the fight?
Comment -
OracleAdamSBR Hustler- 09-28-13
- 63
#40I think you're just about my least favorite poster. I used to think you were OK. You said yourself you're going on a slump. Gee, I wonder why. You're just on here to ridicule people and pretend that you're smarter than everyone else.Originally posted by MDMy new favourite poster.
I'm not posting on here for my ego. I made one bad bet. I'm 14 out of my last 15 bets. Brainstorming and discussing fights is a useful tool for figuring out the puzzle. If I hadn't discussed a fight, I wouldn't have made the over bet on the Cabral/Mitchell fight at +140. I figured that one out. So I messed up on Palhares? It happens. But I'm not out here to insult people or completely shut down someone's theory.Comment -
MDSBR Hall of Famer
- 01-31-12
- 9728
#41Everyone wants to "brainstorm and discuss", nobody wants to "post things that aren't terrible". Everyone wants free ideas, no one wants to post helpful analysis. Get over yourself.Originally posted by OracleAdamI think you're just about my least favorite poster. I used to think you were OK. You said yourself you're going on a slump. Gee, I wonder why. You're just on here to ridicule people and pretend that you're smarter than everyone else.
I'm not posting on here for my ego. I made one bad bet. I'm 14 out of my last 15 bets. Brainstorming and discussing fights is a useful tool for figuring out the puzzle. If I hadn't discussed a fight, I wouldn't have made the over bet on the Cabral/Mitchell fight at +140. I figured that one out. So I messed up on Palhares? It happens. But I'm not out here to insult people or completely shut down someone's theory.Comment -
OracleAdamSBR Hustler- 09-28-13
- 63
#42Nuff said. That Pierce bet wasn't too smart on my part, and the amount of money I put on it was idiotic. I just need to learn from it and recover.Originally posted by MDEveryone wants to "brainstorm and discuss", nobody wants to "post things that aren't terrible". Everyone wants free ideas, no one wants to post helpful analysis. Get over yourself.Comment -
MDSBR Hall of Famer
- 01-31-12
- 9728
#43I never ragged on you for the Pierce bet, or any bet you made. I've only made fun of your logic, which is really bad at times. Don't beat yourself up over a single bet. An overbet is a pretty bad thing to do, but as long as it wasn't a massive one, the most important thing is to just not repeat the behaviour.Originally posted by OracleAdamNuff said. That Pierce bet wasn't too smart on my part, and the amount of money I put on it was idiotic. I just need to learn from it and recover.Comment -
CrassusSBR MVP
- 01-08-12
- 1538
#44How consistent is a fighter who won his last fight due to the effects of poor conditioning show up as heavy and poor conditioned as he did?Originally posted by OracleAdamHe seems pretty consistent to me. He lost to Machida when Machida was at his best. He lost to Evans when he was at his best, and Gustaffson, and easily dispatched everyone else. Was he at risk of losing to Hamill ever in the fight?Comment -
VaughanySBR Aristocracy
- 03-07-10
- 45563
#45Consistent is not a word I'd use to describe Thiago! Unless I'm saying he's consistently inconsistent and consistently unpredictable. Will he be on roids or wont he? Will he gas out after 3 minutes or wont he?Comment -
mmaedSBR MVP
- 11-25-11
- 1327
#46Its too bad too because thiago silva could be pretty good. He almost beat rashad, but he couldnt finish because he gassed.Comment -
Thor4140SBR Posting Legend
- 02-09-08
- 22277
#47The Pierce bet wasn't really that bad of a bet. He crack Palharres early and it look like Palharres was ready to go in quit mode and got lucky getting that leg in my opinion.Originally posted by OracleAdamNuff said. That Pierce bet wasn't too smart on my part, and the amount of money I put on it was idiotic. I just need to learn from it and recover.Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
