Scorecard points bet mayweather -9.5 v canelo +9.5

[Emil4423]

canelo +9.5 on scorecard so how many rounds would he have to win

[MD]

You have to go to a gambling forum to get them to do basic math for you?

[NunyaBidness]

canelo +9.5 on scorecard so how many rounds would he have to win

9 and a half of em, obviously.

[Fistula]

9 and a half of em, obviously.

You're wrong. The prop is the difference between the cumulative amount of all three scorecards. Assuming there's no knockdowns, point deductions, or even rounds, Canelo would have to win at least five rounds on two scorecards and four on the third to win the bet. For Mayweather to win -9.5, he would have to win at least eight rounds on two scorecards and five on the third to win the bet.

[sideloaded]

You're wrong. The prop is the difference between the cumulative amount of all three scorecards. Assuming there's no knockdowns, point deductions, or even rounds, Canelo would have to win at least five rounds on two scorecards and four on the third to win the bet. For Mayweather to win -9.5, he would have to win at least eight rounds on two scorecards and five on the third to win the bet.

Nunya is a dunce, we keep linking him to the kelly calculator but he doesnt get it.

[Mercersux]

You're wrong. The prop is the difference between the cumulative amount of all three scorecards. Assuming there's no knockdowns, point deductions, or even rounds, Canelo would have to win at least five rounds on two scorecards and four on the third to win the bet. For Mayweather to win -9.5, he would have to win at least eight rounds on two scorecards and five on the third to win the bet.

I don't think he was serious....

[MD]

I don't think he was serious....

You'd be surprised. I've seen Nunya say some pretty stupid shit before. I'm 90% sure that he used to post under the screen name Bumfuck,ConnecticutMeUp until I owned him in the game theory discussion thread and he made a new account out of shame.

[cheeese]

You're wrong. The prop is the difference between the cumulative amount of all three scorecards. Assuming there's no knockdowns, point deductions, or even rounds, Canelo would have to win at least five rounds on two scorecards and four on the third to win the bet. For Mayweather to win -9.5, he would have to win at least eight rounds on two scorecards and five on the third to win the bet.

[NunyaBidness]

You're wrong. The prop is the difference between the cumulative amount of all three scorecards. Assuming there's no knockdowns, point deductions, or even rounds, Canelo would have to win at least five rounds on two scorecards and four on the third to win the bet. For Mayweather to win -9.5, he would have to win at least eight rounds on two scorecards and five on the third to win the bet.

Wrong. Cumulative is a type of cloud, not even sure why you'd throw that in there. Guess somebody likes to sound smart.

[omalley21]

I cant even read sbr in class without laughing out loud.