UFC 161 (June 15, 2013)

[Sykes]

they really talking up Woodley here

[Sykes]

Decent round cant take him down though.

[Kermit]

I wonder what Woodley is waiting for?

[mirinquads]

Woodley getting bombed on by a scarecrow

God that striking is stiff, but he has that first round

[MD]

Shields is my hero.

[Imsmarterthanu]

looks like a grappling stalemate so far , in the later rounds i see jake grinding on him

[Imsmarterthanu]

woodley has a GSP stomach now is he on HGH

[Catchn_Picks]

Come on Woodley!! Get going

[THE_LOCKSMITH]

dear god, knees to the arm

[Sykes]

Wheta the point in doing that stupid.

[mirinquads]

KEEP SCORING DEM POINTS SCARECROW

Shields know how to win a fight, what a baller

[TheCalculator]

You actually think Stout deserved to win that fight if it went to decision? If you do, you're legitimately an idiot and you should never bet on sports again.

As it was said before, what I think doesn't matter (and I do believe he lost 30-27), but you should know better than that. Canadian judges are almost as biased as Brazil.

[DSSCA]

Why is nobody talking about the UFC debut of James Krause? I mean
c'mon his nick name is "The James Krause"! Krause coming off a jab-fest destruction of Toby Imada in January and with 8 submissions to his credit. I think he brings a definite threat. His range may prove tough for Stout if he keeps that jab in his face all night. Stout might be the more experienced and stronger fighter, which he could use to his advantage by backing Krause up and bullying him against the cage, but I think there is legitimate value in a +456 ITD for Krause and a +210 just to win. I'll be playing both. Anyone care to share thoughts on this? I did hedge with Stout in a large parlay just in case

Looks like stout ate some jabs and was submitted by a longer fighter who was better on the ground. Damn who saw that coming??

[Imsmarterthanu]

what a boring fight

[bigdrov1x]

a john fitch special...Woodleys got this.

[Catchn_Picks]

Sherdog had Woodley 2-1 for round 1...who for round 2?

[THE_LOCKSMITH]

what is Woodleys game plan land one legkick that knocks him down and take the round off

[Wilfred]

lmao at 44 "Significant" strikes for Woodley.

[goodfellas433]

Looking busy when you can't get him down to blanket

[Catchn_Picks]

depends on how the judges are scoring the pitter patter stuff from Shields

[TheCalculator]

Is Shields winning by aggression and "peppery volume strikes"?

[TheCalculator]

lmao at 44 "Significant" strikes for Woodley.

Whoever's inputing the numbers drank a few too many 7% Canadian beers.

[MD]

I have Shields up two rounds. Second was close, Woodley landed better shots.

[Catchn_Picks]

Woodley is a chicken sh*t

[TheCalculator]

Shields was +160 beginning of r3 in live betting. Still +120.

[Catchn_Picks]

Sherdog has Woodley winning the first two rounds

[Wilfred]

Shields is controlling this fight. Not fun to watch, but he is.

[Imsmarterthanu]

i dont think Canada likes Shields i smell a decision for woodley

[Catchn_Picks]

Spin o rama how did Shields stay up?

[Sykes]

cant believe the odds all the way through this one.

[TheCalculator]

Shields should win via "aggression" and "cage control". But you never fawkin know until the judges hand the papers over.

[Imsmarterthanu]

I think Woodley knows the judges will give it to him

[Kermit]

[Catchn_Picks]

Woodley DEC

[Wilfred]

Woodley lands the biggest shot in all 3. Shields controls all 3.
Interesting call. I think Shields 29-28.