diaz 1,2, and 5

**THE_LOCKSMITH** · 12-20-12, 06:59 PM

Originally posted by gabe

Round 5 - Nicky D. No question. Came closest to ending the fight.

he had his back. but never close to finishing

**Educ8d Degener8** · 12-20-12, 08:09 PM

I gave 10-8's all five rounds in favor of Leonard Garcia.

**freelee** · 12-21-12, 12:20 PM

Condit won the fight by fighting as little as possible the same way basketball games were won before the shot clock there needs to be some kind of rule change imo

**Sacrelicious** · 12-21-12, 12:34 PM

nick diaz was robbed.

**Sacrelicious** · 12-21-12, 12:35 PM

robbed, i tell you, robbed!!!

**gabe** · 12-21-12, 09:49 PM

condit is slick, he robbed diaz n didn't even use a gun

**stefan084** · 12-27-12, 02:02 AM

just rewatched the fight on root tv-- diaz easily takes 1&2, in 3 condit gets more active but the more powerful,cleaner shots still go to diaz, condit takes 4 pretty convincing IMO, in rd 5 diaz is the only one out of the two that threatens to end the fight by taking condits back--therefore i give diaz 5 also. another thing i didn't notice the first time (drinking) was that starting in rd 2 rogan is all over anything condit does and ignores diaz shots. condit was flashy but i thought diaz was way more effective w/ the exception of rd 4--probably a top 100 robbery. other notable mentions IMO: penn/gsp 1(top 150), penn/edgar 1(top 150), bisping/hamill(top 5) number 1 of all time.........drum roll.......that korean guy that "beat" roy jones jr in the olympics

**JSanford** · 12-27-12, 07:20 PM

I only watched it once live and remember thinking Condit won an easy decision. Look no further than the stats for the fight.

**stefan084** · 12-27-12, 10:24 PM

from a boxing perspective diaz wins and it's not close. from a 50 missed spinning back fist, leg kicking from 10 ft away mixed with the occasional effective shot perspective i guess it's close. stat people can say what they want because i suppose a glancing spinning leg kick counts the same on the stat sheet as a vicious body shot. this was the same type of fight imo to penn edgar 1 where franky would buzz around throwing glancing flurries that looked good but did little actual damage, then bj would throw a punch and it would knock edgar back 2 feet and edgar would start the whole circling thing again. flash doesn't equal effective but I guess when rogans telling you how good condit is doing and most on here know nothing about fighting condit winning is accepted--btw i like both condit and diaz and did not bet on the fight so i don't have any obvious bias

**v1y** · 12-28-12, 10:35 AM

Originally posted by JSanford

I only watched it once live and remember thinking Condit won an easy decision. Look no further than the stats for the fight.

Real stats of the fight:

# of significant strikes landed by condit in rounds 1, 2, and 3: 0.

Ergo, diaz won all three rounds, having landed more significant strikes in every round.

Nobody gives a shit about "number of love taps landed".

**Judgejoebrwn** · 12-28-12, 11:12 AM

Originally posted by v1y

Real stats of the fight:

# of significant strikes landed by condit in rounds 1, 2, and 3: 0.

Ergo, diaz won all three rounds, having landed more significant strikes in every round.

Nobody gives a shit about "number of love taps landed".

I should be surprised that people are still talking about this, but I guess nothing surprises me when it comes to Diaz nuthuggers anymore.

I really like how you give your opinion on how many "actual" significant strikes were landed like it means more than a fart in the wind. Fightmetric shows 90 significant strikes for Condit in the first 3 rounds. Somehow you're impeccable logic dropped that to 0 because you love Diaz and hated the way Condit approached the fight.

It's fine to not like what Condit did, but to plain make up shit to help your case is the problem with the Diaz cult nowadays. Same with Stefan up there who said "weak leg kicks are nothing compared to vicious body shots" as if every shot Diaz landed to the body was vicious and every leg kick Condit landed was weak. Clearly he knows cause he was on the receiving end of both, right? Anyone see any pictures of Diaz' leg(s) the day after the fight? He can claim they were baby all he wants during and shortly after the fight, but when his leg(s) are black and blue and swollen the next day...

Besides, go back and watch the fight again. In particular, pay attention to their respective faces after the fight was over. Condit looks immaculate outside of a small goose egg under his right eye. Diaz looked like he was hit with a fire extinguisher. What are we still debating here?

**THE_LOCKSMITH** · 12-28-12, 11:37 AM

UFC scores
Cecil Peoples 49-46 for Condit.
Patricia Morse Jarman 49-46 for Condit.
Junichiro Kamijo 48-47 for Condit.

sherdog
Jordan Breen (48-47 Condit)
Freddie DeFreitas (48-47 Diaz)
Chris Nelson (48-47 Condit)

MMA Junkie 49-46 Condit
MMA Mania 49-46 Condit
MMA Weekly 50-45 Condit
MMAFighting 48-47 Condit
BloodyElbow 49-46 Condit

it's a conspiracy against Diaz bro

**Rubber Guard** · 12-28-12, 11:56 AM

You want me to post all of the actual fighters who gave it to Diaz, again?

It isn't a conspiracy against Diaz. It was a tough fight to call because Condit fought like a homo and tried to steal the fight with a Greg Jackson gameplan. Ala Clay Guida.

Most...actually a large majority of fighters gave it to Diaz.

Neither fighter was "robbed". But it surely wasn't a clear cut win for Condit. The only people that were robbed were the fans.

**THE_LOCKSMITH** · 12-28-12, 12:03 PM

fighters will always pick the fighter who they like or trained with. Just look at the pro picks on sherdog. the mma sites scores are less biased.

**Rubber Guard** · 12-28-12, 12:10 PM

Who the F trains with Diaz that picked him on those tweets?

Diaz isn't really "boys" with many fighters.

Your point is invalid.

**Rubber Guard** · 12-28-12, 12:13 PM

So you take pointdexters opinion over actual fighters.

We say how bad the judging is in MMA....yet when this happens you use Cecil Peoples as a good indicator? Why? Everyone on sites and forums think old fighters should do more judging.

I'm not saying Diaz was robbed. I'm just saying it was a tough fight to call. If you score a bunch of points for leg taps then you would say Condit won. If you don't then you would say Diaz won.

Shogun drilled Machida with REAL kicks for 5 rounds and wasn't given the decision.

Condit had a couple minutes of 1 round where he was really throwing. When he landed that combo ending with the head kick. Diaz walked through it with ease, but those were actually meaningful shots.

**THE_LOCKSMITH** · 12-28-12, 12:20 PM

Originally posted by Rubber Guard

Who the F trains with Diaz that picked him on those tweets?

Diaz isn't really "boys" with many fighters.

Your point is invalid.

yea you know who likes Diaz as a fighter or who he's "boys" with

**NunyaBidness** · 12-28-12, 12:23 PM

Someone get a gun and put this thread out if it's misery.

**PunisherIND** · 12-28-12, 12:28 PM

Originally posted by NunyaBidness

Someone get a gun and put this thread out if it's misery.

i was thinking about shoving it in front of an oncoming train

**Rubber Guard** · 12-28-12, 12:28 PM

UFC 143 in Tweets: Pros Score Nick Diaz vs. Carlos Condit

http://www.mmafighting.com/2012/2/5/2772168/ufc-143-twitter-nick-diaz-vs-carlos-condit-pros-score

Pros sound off with their opinion of the judge's decision for UFC 143's controversial main event, Nick Diaz vs. Carlos Condit.

Who is he boys with.

Tim Kennedy, man of the military, serious guy, doubting he cares for Diaz's mentality. " I Hate Judges!" following UFC 143.

Mark Muñoz
Gr8 fight! Think Diaz 4 rounds to 1. We'll see! #ufc143
Pat Miletich
That decision was an absolute joke. At best, Condit won 2 rounds.

**THE_LOCKSMITH** · 12-28-12, 12:28 PM

**THE_LOCKSMITH** · 12-28-12, 12:47 PM

Originally posted by Rubber Guard

http://www.mmafighting.com/2012/2/5/...dit-pros-score

Who is he boys with.

Tim Kennedy, man of the military, serious guy, doubting he cares for Diaz's mentality. " I Hate Judges!" following UFC 143.

Mark Muñoz
Gr8 fight! Think Diaz 4 rounds to 1. We'll see! #ufc143
Pat Miletich
That decision was an absolute joke. At best, Condit won 2 rounds.

Wow Kennedy and Miletich guys from StrikeForce gave it to the StrikeForce Welterweight champion. Thank you for proving my point valid

**Fenster** · 12-28-12, 12:56 PM

Originally posted by Judgejoebrwn

I should be surprised that people are still talking about this, but I guess nothing surprises me when it comes to Diaz nuthuggers anymore.

I really like how you give your opinion on how many "actual" significant strikes were landed like it means more than a fart in the wind. Fightmetric shows 90 significant strikes for Condit in the first 3 rounds. Somehow you're impeccable logic dropped that to 0 because you love Diaz and hated the way Condit approached the fight.

It's fine to not like what Condit did, but to plain make up shit to help your case is the problem with the Diaz cult nowadays. Same with Stefan up there who said "weak leg kicks are nothing compared to vicious body shots" as if every shot Diaz landed to the body was vicious and every leg kick Condit landed was weak. Clearly he knows cause he was on the receiving end of both, right? Anyone see any pictures of Diaz' leg(s) the day after the fight? He can claim they were baby all he wants during and shortly after the fight, but when his leg(s) are black and blue and swollen the next day...

Besides, go back and watch the fight again. In particular, pay attention to their respective faces after the fight was over. Condit looks immaculate outside of a small goose egg under his right eye. Diaz looked like he was hit with a fire extinguisher. What are we still debating here?

That is not possible. He would not have 90 if they fought for 20 rounds.

**Fenster** · 12-28-12, 12:58 PM

Originally posted by THE_LOCKSMITH

UFC scores
Cecil Peoples 49-46 for Condit.
Patricia Morse Jarman 49-46 for Condit.
Junichiro Kamijo 48-47 for Condit.

sherdog
Jordan Breen (48-47 Condit)
Freddie DeFreitas (48-47 Diaz)
Chris Nelson (48-47 Condit)

MMA Junkie 49-46 Condit
MMA Mania 49-46 Condit
MMA Weekly 50-45 Condit
MMAFighting 48-47 Condit
BloodyElbow 49-46 Condit

it's a conspiracy against Diaz bro

Wow, it really must be. 50-45 for Condit? Jesus Christ, that person should kill himself.

**Fenster** · 12-28-12, 01:00 PM

Originally posted by THE_LOCKSMITH

fighters will always pick the fighter who they like or trained with. Just look at the pro picks on sherdog. the mma sites scores are less biased.

I was a big fan of both Diaz and Condit. Diaz won that fight. No question about it.

**Rubber Guard** · 12-28-12, 01:01 PM

And plenty UFC's nice guys gave it to Diaz as well? What is your point? Ellenberger talked a bunch of shit about Diaz when he came over to the UFC and he gave it to Diaz.

The politically correct Stann gave it to Condit. Tate, Ronda's foe didn't give it to Diaz. Hmmm, Fitch, a guy who hates Diaz gave it to Condit.

More UFC guys gave the SF guy the nod than they did Condit. So what is your point? Champs like Anderson, JDS, and Chuck all gave it to Diaz as well.

Point is, it was hard to judge. If you score pt fighting you gave it to Condit. It worked for Condit, so what do you know a little later Guida (a greg jackson fighter) tries to do the same to Maynard. Because he knew he couldn't out-strike him or out-wrestle him. Fighters gave it to Diaz. Judges gave it to Condit. It was basically 50/50 in terms of general population it seems. The Diaz haters are just as bad as Diaz nut-huggers.

**THE_LOCKSMITH** · 12-28-12, 01:18 PM

Originally posted by Rubber Guard

And plenty UFC's nice guys gave it to Diaz as well? What is your point? Ellenberger talked a bunch of shit about Diaz when he came over to the UFC and he gave it to Diaz.

The politically correct Stann gave it to Condit. Tate, Ronda's foe didn't give it to Diaz. Hmmm, Fitch, a guy who hates Diaz gave it to Condit.

Thats exactly my point, fighters are way more biased toward who won the fight. The "pointdexters" generally have the fight scored correct according to the rules, not based on Condit fighting like a "homo"