NYY -242, 2.42u
CWS -153, 1.53u
NYY u9, -105, 1.05u
CWS -153, 1.53u
NYY u9, -105, 1.05u
-
Comment -
Thanks for the support, fitguy.Originally posted by fitguy67Comment -
DET -188, 1.88uComment -
ATL -145, 1.45uComment -
Record: 114-104, +16.44u, ROI=6.7%Comment -
PHI -243, 2.43u
BOS -146, 1.46u
TAM -133, 1.33u
SDG u6.5, -125, 1.25u
ARI o9.5, -103, 1.03u
LOS u6, -124, 1.24uComment -
FLA -120, 1.2uComment -
6 and "oh" with just 1 to go...
picked a good time to rediscover you and your 7%-ish yield...if you don't mind me asking...are you capping each game the "old fashioned" "flesh & blood" way...or do you run a system with built-in filters (with/without additional post-output exogenous filters)...
either way, this (along with BobLoblaw's thread) is one of the smoothest rides up a 5%-or-better path i've found.Comment -
Record: 120-105, +21.24u, ROI=8.3%Comment -
CUB +103, 1u
CUB u11.5, -118, 1.18uComment -
SDG -154, 1.54u
SEA -117, 1.17u
KC o6.5, -128, 1.28uComment -
Record: 124-106, +24.1u, ROI=9.2%Comment -
CHC +110, 1u (game 1)Comment -
PHI -137, 1.37u
ARI -156, 1.56u
SDG -121, 1.21u
BOS o7, -114, 1.14uComment -
CUB +100, 1u (game 2)Comment -
Record: 127-109, +23.96u, ROI=8.9%Comment -
ARI u9.5, -125, 1.25uComment -
BAL +116, 1u
BOS +103, 1u
TOR -179, 1.79u
NYY -142, 1.42u
HOU +121, 1u
DET u9.5, -123, 1.23u
BOS o9.5, -119, 1.19u
PIT o8, -116, 1.16uComment -
Record: 130-115, +20.38u, ROI=7.3%Comment -
CUB +102, 1u
NYY u8.5, -105, 1.05uComment -
HOU +103, 1uComment -
Record: 133-115, +23.43u, ROI=8.3%Comment -
good workComment -
WAS -142, 1.42u
NYM +101, 1u
FLA +146, 1u
OAK -109, 1.09u
LAA -115, 1.15u
SFO o8.5, -116, 1.16u
CIN u8.5, +100, 1u
NYM u8.5, -108, 1.08u
TAM u9, -114, 1.14u
LOS o7, -123, 1.23u
SDG o6.5, -110, 1.1uComment -
Record: 137-122, +19.79u, ROI=6.7%Comment -
PHI -159, 1.59u
CUB -113, 1.13u
CWS o8.5, -105, 1.05uComment -
DET -175, 1.75u
BAL +149, 1u
MIN +102, 1u
SFO o8.5, -104, 1.04u
BAL o7.5, -110, 1.1u
FLA o10.5, -108, 1.08uComment -
Record: 141-127, +17.86u, ROI=5.8%Comment -
WAS -153, 1.53u
TAM -146, 1.46u
SFO o8.5, -113, 1.13u
ATL u7.5, -117, 1.17u
STL u8.0, -110, 1.1u
KC o10, -118, 1.18u
OAK u6.5, -123, 1.23uComment -
TEX u9.0, +100, 1uComment -
snapper, i love your super-concise/super-consistent/super-complete (including the all-important return on $-played, something that almost no-one else reports) posting style...should be required of all would-be thread-starters to study and agree to follow this format (including the standard three letter codes for each team...FLA or SEA is way better than seeing "M's" and have to figure out some other way which team is meant)
One tiny suggestion to improve your currently almost-perfect presentation (I’m a u-prof, and I’ll bump u from a class-high’A’ to ‘A+’)...when you report your “win-loss, units, roi”could you indicate WHICH plays won/lost something like you did on your very last thread here= http://forum.sbrforum.com/baseball-h...lb-2011-a.html see very last post #22).
A less time-consuming alternative would be to simply put something like “LWWLLWLL”, which any thread follower would figure out means the results of the previous slate in the exact order in which you previously posted (my example covers yesterday’s result…throw in a “P” for a “push” or postponement…) This way you wouldn’t have to “Richard” around with icons.
Anyhow, just a suggestion…it doesn’t kill me to visit a third-party score site and WLP ‘em myself…I just thot’ I’d mention it cuz I just saw in your previous thread’s presentation (which I came upon by accident) that u used to spoonfeed the game-by-gamee results to tailing knuckleheads like me before.
________________________
You, and BL, rule, without all the shit-slinging that inevitably infects almost all other season-long threads.Comment -
WAS -153, 1.53u
TAM -146, 1.46u
SFO o8.5, -113, 1.13u
ATL u7.5, -117, 1.17u
STL u8.0, -110, 1.1u
KC o10, -118, 1.18u
OAK u6.5, -123, 1.23u
TEX u9.0, +100, 1u
Record: 145-131, +16.93u, ROI=5.4%Comment -
OAK -104, 1.04u
MIL u7.5, -128, 1.28uComment -
thanks for that snap...Comment -
FLA -108, 1.08u
STL u7.0, -102, 1.02uComment
