John Morrison 2011 MLB

[Kev the Brit]

I cannot believe that Oakland will sweep Boston after their dreadful performance last night. Also, we can be confident that Cubs will not sweep Milwauki.

2 Pre-V3 bets on tonight: BRS and Mil

[Wallco99]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$
2011 System to date: 224-20 (v2: 51-5)
System profit/loss: -21.51 units(finished series)
Since my first post: -41.78 units (209-20) (fin. series)
Current open series: 2 (-2.00 units)

(8/25/11):
#231 Minnesota (-1½) v2 (D) - Loss
#242 Detroit (M/L) v2 (B) - Win
#246 Atlanta (M/L) v2 (A) - Win

(A) 118-127
(B) 63-62
(C) 28-34
(D) 14-20

Games for (8/26/11):
#244 Florida @ Philadelphia (-1½) v2 (B) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)
#245 San Diego (M/L) @ Arizona v2 (B) *Official* (9:40 pm EDT)
#247 Colorado (M/L) @ L.A. Dodgers (A) *Official* (10:10 pm EDT)
#248 Colorado (M/L) @ L.A. Dodgers (A) *Official* (10:10 pm EDT)
#249 Atlanta (-1½) @ N.Y. Mets v2 (A) *Official* (7:10 pm EDT)
#250 L.A. Angels (M/L) @ Texas (A) (8:05 pm EDT)
#251 San Diego (M/L) @ Arizona (A) *Official* (9:40 pm EDT)
#252 N.Y. Yankees @ Baltimore (M/L) (A) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)
#253 Oakland (M/L) @ Boston (A) *Official* (7:10 pm EDT)
#254 Detroit (-1½) @ Minnesota v2 (A) (8:10 pm EDT)
#255 Washington @ Cincinnati (-1½) (A) *Official* (7:10 pm EDT)
#256 Washington @ Cincinnati (M/L) (A) *Official* (7:10 pm EDT)



** Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “Official” appears next to the game. All lines and standings are based on final lines from ScoresandOdds.com. Some of the unofficial plays may change to the other team by game time. Official plays will not change. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, buy the alternate line for (-1½) on the team I have listed at (-1½), not the other team. NEVER PLAY (+1½) LINE ON ANY GAME IN THIS SYSTEM.
System backtest can be found in post #3446.

The v1 plays may change to the other team by game time. The v2 plays will not change teams, but may change (M/L) or (R/L), the team will usually remain the same. Once Official, nothing will change. We have to be careful when playing a game that qualifies for both v1 and v2, because if a team should switch, we may be playing both sides later in the series, or we could even start out on both sides. The system will count all games as wins/losses, how you play them is your discretion. If not otherwise marked, the play will be v1.

[ken23lau]

Where is hagball?

[knugen]

Vacation, he sad he Will update tomorrow morning

[Wallco99]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$ - Plays for 8/26/11
2011 System to date: 224-20 (v2: 51-5)
System profit/loss: -21.51 units(finished series)
Since my first post: -41.78 units (209-20) (fin. series)
Current open series: 2 (-2.00 units)

#244 Florida @ Philadelphia (-1½) v2 (B) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)
#245 San Diego (M/L) @ Arizona v2 (B) *Official* (9:40 pm EDT)
#247 Colorado (M/L) @ L.A. Dodgers (A) *Official* (10:10 pm EDT)
#248 Colorado (M/L) @ L.A. Dodgers (A) *Official* (10:10 pm EDT)
#249 Atlanta (-1½) @ N.Y. Mets v2 (A) *Official* (7:10 pm EDT)
#250 L.A. Angels (M/L) @ Texas (A) *Official* (8:05 pm EDT)
#251 San Diego (M/L) @ Arizona (A) *Official* (9:40 pm EDT)
#252 N.Y. Yankees @ Baltimore (M/L) (A) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)
#253 Oakland (M/L) @ Boston (A) *Official* (7:10 pm EDT)
#254 Detroit (-1½) @ Minnesota v2 (A) *Official* (8:10 pm EDT)
#255 Washington @ Cincinnati (-1½) (A) *Official* (7:10 pm EDT)
#256 Washington @ Cincinnati (M/L) (A) *Official* (7:10 pm EDT)


** Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “Official” appears next to the game. All lines and standings are based on final lines from ScoresandOdds.com. Some of the unofficial plays may change to the other team by game time. Official plays will not change. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, buy the alternate line for (-1½) on the team I have listed at (-1½), not the other team. NEVER PLAY (+1½) LINE ON ANY GAME IN THIS SYSTEM.
System backtest can be found in post #3446.

The v1 plays may change to the other team by game time. The v2 plays will not change teams, but may change (M/L) or (R/L), the team will usually remain the same. Once Official, nothing will change. We have to be careful when playing a game that qualifies for both v1 and v2, because if a team should switch, we may be playing both sides later in the series, or we could even start out on both sides. The system will count all games as wins/losses, how you play them is your discretion. If not otherwise marked, the play will be v1.

[Kev the Brit]

e-mail from JM today:

Chicago A Bet
Oakland A Bet

Both unofficial (well outside the RPI limits)

IMHO one of them will be swept, but I hope I'm wrong

Kev

[hagball52]

I'm back. Had a long day traveling yesterday and had to go in early this morning. Will update everthing tomorrow morning.

[NZT-48]

actually I know this is going to be funny but Ive been getting JM champ selections blah blah picks for free the last few days and the just playing the highest rated plays hasnt been all that bad but.....

yes I do the know history of this clown b/c yes I have bought the same picks before mos ago and they sucked ass but now he says hes got inside info blah blah and so on but still not too bad the last 3-4 days anyone been following it?

[Wallco99]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$
2011 System to date: 228-20 (v2: 52-5)
System profit/loss: -16.26 units(finished series)
Since my first post: -36.53 units (213-20) (fin. series)
Current open series: 8 (-12.40 units)

(8/26/11):
#244 Philadelphia (-1½) v2 (B) - Loss
#245 San Diego (M/L) v2 (B) - Loss
#247 Colorado (M/L) (A) - Loss
#248 Colorado (M/L) (A) - Loss
#249 Atlanta (-1½) v2 (A) - Loss
#250 L.A. Angels (M/L) (A) - Loss
#251 San Diego (M/L) (A) - Loss
#252 Baltimore (M/L) (A) - Win
#253 Oakland (M/L) (A) - Win
#254 Detroit (-1½) v2 (A) - Win
#255 Cincinnati (-1½) (A) - Loss
#256 Cincinnati (M/L) (A) - Win

(A) 123-133
(B) 63-64
(C) 28-34
(D) 14-20

Games for (8/27/11):
#244 Florida @ Philadelphia (-1½) v2 (C) *Official* (1:05 pm EDT)
#245 San Diego (M/L) @ Arizona v2 (C) *Official* (8:10 pm EDT)
#247 Colorado (M/L) @ L.A. Dodgers (B) *Official* (4:10 pm EDT)
#248 Colorado (M/L) @ L.A. Dodgers (B) *Official* (4:10 pm EDT)
#249 Continued after Hurricane
#250 L.A. Angels (M/L) @ Texas (B) (8:05 pm EDT)
#251 San Diego (M/L) @ Arizona (B) *Official* (8:10 pm EDT)
#255 Washington @ Cincinnati (-1½) (B) *Official* (7:10 pm EDT)
#257 Colorado (M/L) @ L.A. Dodgers v2 (A) *Official* (4:10 pm EDT)



** Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “Official” appears next to the game. All lines and standings are based on final lines from ScoresandOdds.com. Some of the unofficial plays may change to the other team by game time. Official plays will not change. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, buy the alternate line for (-1½) on the team I have listed at (-1½), not the other team. NEVER PLAY (+1½) LINE ON ANY GAME IN THIS SYSTEM.
System backtest can be found in post #3446.

The v1 plays may change to the other team by game time. The v2 plays will not change teams, but may change (M/L) or (R/L), the team will usually remain the same. Once Official, nothing will change. We have to be careful when playing a game that qualifies for both v1 and v2, because if a team should switch, we may be playing both sides later in the series, or we could even start out on both sides. The system will count all games as wins/losses, how you play them is your discretion. If not otherwise marked, the play will be v1.

[G's pks]

Wallco..I was wondering...tough night again for you as you had another losing night...The -1.5 games seem to be the ones crushing your system... I am sure someone can answer this..what percentage of baseball games end up being won by one run....answer in link...


Well...here you go... plase click link and enjoy might be a major part of why the system has spent 80% of the time in the red even with all the increased plays...

I have never been 50 units down like you are..but see if this helps a little...

click here...

http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/perusing-one-run-games/

[hagball52]

JM MLB System

2011 Official season series record 29-1 (v1)
(A) 16-14
(B) 10-4
(C) 3-1
V2 plays 9-5
V3 system 4-1
Unofficial series 33-1

*Unofficial*
(8/26/2011) Oakland (.492)@ Boston (.531) R/L (A) Win
(8/26/2011) Chicago Cubs (.482)@ Milwaukee (.517)R/L (A) Loss

Next Plays
*Unofficial*
(8/27/2011) Chicago Cubs (.481) @ Milwaukee (.518) R/L (B) (8/28 (C) if necc.)

V3
(8/27/2011) Boston (.530) v Oakland (.493) M/L (A)(8/27 (B) if necc.) evening game of a double header

Upcoming Plays
(8/29/2011) Minnesota @ Chicago White Sox
(9/02/2011) Oakland v Seattle
(9/02/2011) Pittsburgh @ Chicago Cubs
(9/02/2011) Houston v Milwaukee
(9/05/2011) Cleveland v Detroit

Notes: Sorry about not updating yesterday. I was out of town Thursday and busy yesterday. There were 3 sweeps in the last set of series and only 1 resulted in a future play. HOU v COL (9/22).

P.S. That BOS game starts in about 30 minutes.

[Mrscofield25]

Oh s… the f… up G. How old are you, 5 years old? The only thing I’ve seen the last week when I log on SBR is you complaining about every other peoples games. Why don’t you start mind your own business? What the h… is your problem? Do you need constant attention or what? One of my friends is a psychologist, I’ve shown him the things you write in the different threads, he says that you need some serious help. You obviously have a serious problem. If you don’t get some serious help you will hurt yourself in the last end. Why bashing in other peoples thread? Let them mind their business and you mind your business. I really don’t understand why your thread isn’t closed yet and why you don’t have been blocked from SBR. If I was a moderator I would have blocked you weeks ago! All you do is creating a bad ambience. People are here to make money, people control what they want to bet, they are here to learn something and maybe get some friends. It can’t be that hard to accept or what? If you don’t have anything reasonable to say, then get the h… out of here!!! Find a psychologist and get the help you need. Nobody is never dead of admitting that they have a problem, and that is what you have. I’m sick and tired of seeing complaining, complaining and more complaining from you. That’s all you do!!! Mind your own business and let Wallco do what he does, same goes with Atari. Let them do what they do. Now go to your room and shame on you till you get adult enough to commit in the society! You are obviously not adult enough to be here right now.

[G's pks]

Mrscofield25 yes...your friend is a psychologist..and yes wallco is down that amount...and the link is provided to help...why would you have a problem with that? Maybe ask your friend...Mrsocfield25...maybe you are a client...or sounds like you should be...

[bruloc]

JM MLB System

2011 Official season series record 29-1 (v1)
(A) 16-14
(B) 10-4
(C) 3-1
V2 plays 9-5
V3 system 4-1
Unofficial series 33-1

*Unofficial*
(8/26/2011) Oakland (.492)@ Boston (.531) R/L (A) Win
(8/26/2011) Chicago Cubs (.482)@ Milwaukee (.517)R/L (A) Loss

Next Plays
*Unofficial*
(8/27/2011) Chicago Cubs (.481) @ Milwaukee (.518) R/L (B) (8/28 (C) if necc.)

V3
(8/27/2011) Boston (.530) v Oakland (.493) M/L (A)(8/28 (B) if necc.)

Upcoming Plays
(8/29/2011) Minnesota @ Chicago White Sox
(9/02/2011) Oakland v Seattle
(9/02/2011) Pittsburgh @ Chicago Cubs
(9/02/2011) Houston v Milwaukee
(9/05/2011) Cleveland v Detroit

Notes: Sorry about not updating yesterday. I was out of town Thursday and busy yesterday. There were 3 sweeps in the last set of series and only 1 resulted in a future play. HOU v COL (9/22).

P.S. That BOS game starts in about 30 minutes.

Just in case, bet (B) on Boston is today.

[hagball52]

Just in case, bet (B) on Boston is today.

Thanks. Went back and fixed it. Just missed that. Sorry.

[edge444]

God I love this thread whenever I am bored I spend an hour or so catching up and it never ceases to amaze me how seriously you Guy's take one another. The one thing I don't understand is why people seem quick to slate G after all he was the Guy who warned everyone that the Walco system would fail. Now having said that, I have to say I am very impressed with Walco for staying with it and not running when things turned against him but I do think he put too much store in his back testing after all back testing is exactly that, they were the results in those situations. You will always see a statement at the bottom of any financial advice telling you that past performance is no guarantee of future results. I admire anyone who is prepared to put their plays in a forum as they are open to be shot at everytime the results go bad or a system fails. I have used a system this season with good results but a would be very reluctant to post for the reasons stated. The main thrust of this message is keep it going Guy's but give G a break just remember he warned everyone and hopefully saved some bank rolls. I would also say good luck Walco really hope it turns around as my life will have a little bit missing if I cant read this thread.

[G's pks]

God I love this thread whenever I am bored I spend an hour or so catching up and it never ceases to amaze me how seriously you Guy's take one another. The one thing I don't understand is why people seem quick to slate G after all he was the Guy who warned everyone that the Walco system would fail. Now having said that, I have to say I am very impressed with Walco for staying with it and not running when things turned against him but I do think he put too much store in his back testing after all back testing is exactly that, they were the results in those situations. You will always see a statement at the bottom of any financial advice telling you that past performance is no guarantee of future results. I admire anyone who is prepared to put their plays in a forum as they are open to be shot at everytime the results go bad or a system fails. I have used a system this season with good results but a would be very reluctant to post for the reasons stated. The main thrust of this message is keep it going Guy's but give G a break just remember he warned everyone and hopefully saved some bank rolls. I would also say good luck Walco really hope it turns around as my life will have a little bit missing if I cant read this thread.

And all I did is mention he is down...give him a link for review which could possibly help and all of a sudden I need to see a doctor! I have suggested dropping the bottom tier teams and all I get is grief...

Seriously he has tried to add games...which if he goes on a run could wipe out the losses...but all this creates more risk... I think suggestions would be more than welcome...guys lets face it...even if the system comes back from 50 units down...some online accounts would not and unfortunately some did not withstand such a loss... reminds me a little of samsincharge..same situation...

[Andy3568]

Wallco..I was wondering...tough night again for you as you had another losing night...The -1.5 games seem to be the ones crushing your system... I am sure someone can answer this..what percentage of baseball games end up being won by one run....answer in link...


Well...here you go... plase click link and enjoy might be a major part of why the system has spent 80% of the time in the red even with all the increased plays...

I have never been 50 units down like you are..but see if this helps a little...

click here...
http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/ar...one-run-games/

Your link shows that one run games make up 30% of all games. That leaves 70% decided by more than one run. Now what is that supposed to explain again?

[Bugs Bunny]

missed the early v3 bet on boston... gutted!!!

[Glada Tartan]

E bet needed to Cubs

[G's pks]

Your link shows that one run games make up 30% of all games. That leaves 70% decided by more than one run. Now what is that supposed to explain again?

Its ok...

[GGPLAYER]

missed the early v3 bet on boston... gutted!!!

me too

[Wallco99]

G

If anyone can hear what she typed over the loud bold and it seems worthwhile, please retype it so others can read it. If it is the normal nonsesnse, I will probably expect no responses. She may have said something, but who knows!

[jphil]

would someone please start a separate JM NBA thread this season that never allows any of this other bogus clutter & test system nonsense on it? we've got JM nfl & nhl pretty much established, i hope. (& no, unfortunately i can't be the guy for obvious reasons).

[analyzer]

Good afternoon fellas!

I realize this is the baseball thread but was curious what systems you follow for NFL and NCAAF? Thanks!

[NZT-48]

just wanted to repost not trying to run it into the ground just wanted some peoples take on it as well thanks

actually I know this is going to be funny but Ive been getting JM champ selections blah blah picks for free the last few days and the just playing the highest rated plays hasnt been all that bad but.....

yes I do the know history of this clown b/c yes I have bought the same picks before mos ago and they sucked ass but now he says hes got inside info blah blah and so on but still not too bad the last 3-4 days anyone been following it?

[dlunc3]

Good afternoon fellas!

I realize this is the baseball thread but was curious what systems you follow for NFL and NCAAF? Thanks!

Ace-Ace 99 system is the best

send me an email and ill give you some info-- dlaury3@hotmail.com (not sure if I am allowed to post my email on here? if not, please remove this post mods. Thank you)

[Wallco99]

would someone please start a separate JM NBA thread this season that never allows any of this other bogus clutter & test system nonsense on it? we've got JM nfl & nhl pretty much established, i hope. (& no, unfortunately i can't be the guy for obvious reasons).

If you want it, you do it. Otherwise same as last year. Chase 110 will be there.

[Kev the Brit]

If you want it, you do it. Otherwise same as last year. Chase 110 will be there.

I don't understand why you think its OK to cause confusion. Chase 110 deserves its own thread. I believe you said last season that you would create a Chase 110 thread this coming season.

Kev

[Andy3568]

Wow, the Angels bet never became official?

[ken23lau]

Yea what happened to the Angels?

[jphil]

'If you want it, you do it. Otherwise same as last year. Chase 110 will be there'.


seem a little too sure/full of yourself sometimes, don't ya fella?

[jphil]

I don't understand why you think its OK to cause confusion. Chase 110 deserves its own thread. I believe you said last season that you would create a Chase 110 thread this coming season.

Kev

it's not like we haven't been round & round w/this guy before. I assume that he's attracted enough of a following by now to go on his own. why the persistant resistance & cockiness? we'd like to continue w/ our winning/concise threads thankyou, Mr. Wall.

[G's pks]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$
2011 System to date: 228-20 (v2: 52-5)
System profit/loss: -16.26 units(finished series)
Since my first post: -36.53 units (213-20) (fin. series)
Current open series: 8 (-12.40 units)

(8/26/11):
#244 Philadelphia (-1½) v2 (B) - Loss
#245 San Diego (M/L) v2 (B) - Loss
#247 Colorado (M/L) (A) - Loss
#248 Colorado (M/L) (A) - Loss
#249 Atlanta (-1½) v2 (A) - Loss
#250 L.A. Angels (M/L) (A) - Loss
#251 San Diego (M/L) (A) - Loss
#252 Baltimore (M/L) (A) - Win
#253 Oakland (M/L) (A) - Win
#254 Detroit (-1½) v2 (A) - Win
#255 Cincinnati (-1½) (A) - Loss
#256 Cincinnati (M/L) (A) - Win

(A) 123-133
(B) 63-64
(C) 28-34
(D) 14-20

Games for (8/27/11):
#245 San Diego (M/L) @ Arizona v2 (C) *Official* (8:10 pm EDT)Loss
#247 Colorado (M/L) @ L.A. Dodgers (B) *Official* (4:10 pm EDT)Loss
#248 Colorado (M/L) @ L.A. Dodgers (B) *Official* (4:10 pm EDT)Loss
##251 San Diego (M/L) @ Arizona (B) *Official* (8:10 pm EDT)Loss
#255 Washington @ Cincinnati (-1½) (B) *Official* (7:10 pm EDT)win
#257 Colorado (M/L) @ L.A. Dodgers v2 (A) *Official* (4:10 pm EDT)Loss

1-5? and 4-8 yesterday? 5-13...And you are still laughing...and a couple are still following...wow...

[jphil]

damn. what did i start now.