John Morrison 2011 MLB

[NZT-48]

Congrats on cashing on BOTH of the unofficial [C] bets yesterday!
We are now a PERFECT 17-0 on the official bets so far this season,
and a remarkable 23-1 on the unofficial ones! Betting along on my
MLB system is literally free money flowing to your account!

Let's go pick up some more wins!

Go to the link below to see our upcoming system bet(s):

http://www.sportsbettingchamp.com/737376

This page shows the bet(s) that you will need to place today. The
team on top is the team you need to bet for. The team on bottom is
the team they're playing against. The letter in bracket is the bet
type you'll need to place.

For example, if the page shows:

4/11 - Colorado [A]
Arizona

Then this means that on 4/11 you will need to place a bet on the
Colorado Rockies to beat the Arizona Diamondbacks. The amount you
should bet is the amount you've set on your Bet A. Remember to bet
on the +1.5 run line if the team you're betting for is the
underdog, and on the money line if the team you're betting for is
the favorite. Basically, if the +1.5 option is available for the
team you're betting on, then bet on the 1.5 run line. If the +1.5
run line is not available (it will show as -1.5 instead), then bet
on the money line. Note that if you bet on the +1.5 run line, then
you will win the bet even if your team loses the game by 1 run.

One more thing to keep in mind is that sometimes you may not
immediately see the game available for betting on the betting site.
Sometimes the game might be available but the run line isn't shown.
If this is the case, just wait and check back later during the day.

Good luck!
John Morrison, PhD

P.S. Check out my revolutionary new service, the "Sports Picks
Buffet" where I subscribe to over 500 world-famous sports
handicappers, reveal to you in my private members area ALL of their
picks every day, and summarize for you the "best bets" of the day
where most of all handicappers tend to agree on! Go to:
www.SportsPicksBuffet.com

PO Box 30175
Worcester, MA 01603
Usa

thank you sir

[Andy3568]

Quick note: The Padres look like a good bet all the way through. For the Cardinals game, the RPI difference is 0.014, so it's pretty much a sure thing that they will be out of range for the B bet if the Cardinals lose the A bet. For JM, that means it's official if it wins and unofficial if it loses.

[NZT-48]

Quick note: The Padres look like a good bet all the way through. For the Cardinals game, the RPI difference is 0.014, so it's pretty much a sure thing that they will be out of range for the B bet if the Cardinals lose the A bet. For JM, that means it's official if it wins and unofficial if it loses.

yes all good pts

[Wallco99]

JM MLB System

2011 Official season series record 17-1 (v1)
(A) 11-7
(B) 4-3
(C) 2-1
V2 plays 5-4
V3 system 3-1
Unofficial series 23-0

*Unofficial*
(7/31/2011) Florida (.498) @ Atlanta (.523) R/L (C) Win
(7/31/2011) Chicago Cubs (.470) @ St Louis (.495) R/L (C) Win

Next Plays
Official
(8/01/2011) St Louis (.494)@ Milwaukee (.508) R/L (A) (3 gm set (C) if necc.)
(8/01/2011) San Diego (.480) v LA Dodgers (.483) R/L (A) (3 gm set (C) if necc.)

Upcoming Plays
(8/02/2011) Kansas City v Baltimore
(8/05/2011) Cleveland @ Texas
(8/05/2011) Seattle @ LA Angels
(8/05/2011) Houston v Milwaukee
(8/05/2011) NY Yankees @ Boston *

Notes: Awesome pick up on the 2 (C) bets. Hopefully that will shut G's up. I played 'em both. Got 3 Official bets in a row here, 2 today and 1 tomorrow. They all look good. I'm sure Morrison will tell us to load up. Out of 6 possible sweeps yesterday there were 3 with only one resulting in a future play. Mark it down on your JM calender: HOU v MIL (8/05). GL all

* On that NYY/BOS series I'm not sure if Morrison will call it a play because that was the second time the Yanks were swept this year by the Sox. A few people have mentioned it won't be a play but I have seen in the past where it is. We'll wait and see what JM does. Personally I think it will be a great play even if it's not a Morrison play. Sweeping a good team 3 times in a row is next to impossible.

Hagball, why does JM email say official is 17-0 and unofficial is 23-1? Which play is he not counting official that we did? Thanks.

[Wallco99]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$ - Plays for 8/1/11
2011 System to date: 160-12 (v2: 18-1)
System profit/loss: +18.53 units (finished series)
Since my first post: -1.74 units (145-12) (fin. series)
Current open series: 3 (-5.00 units)


#173 Florida @ N.Y. Mets (-1½) v2 (C) *Official* (7:10 pm EDT)
#174 Chicago Cubs @ Pittsburgh (-1½) v2 (B) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)
#175 St. Louis @ Milwaukee (-1½) v2 (B) *Official* (8:10 pm EDT)
#176 Cincinnati (M/L) @ Houston (A) *Official* (8:05 pm EDT)
#177 Cincinnati (-1½) @ Houston (A) *Official* (8:05 pm EDT)
#178 N.Y. Yankees @ Chicago White Sox (M/L) (A) *Official* (8:10 pm EDT)
#179 Philadelphia @ Colorado (M/L) (A) *Official* (8:40 pm EDT)
#180 Chicago Cubs @ Pittsburgh (M/L) (A) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)
#181 Chicago Cubs @ Pittsburgh (-1½) (A) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)


** Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “Official” appears next to the game. All lines and standings are based on final lines from ScoresandOdds.com. Some of the unofficial plays may change to the other team by game time. Official plays will not change. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, buy the alternate line for (-1½) on the team I have listed at (-1½), not the other team. NEVER PLAY (+1½) LINE ON ANY GAME IN THIS SYSTEM.
System backtest can be found in post #3446.

The v1 plays may change to the other team by game time. The v2 plays will not change teams, but may change (M/L) or (R/L), the team will usually remain the same. Once Official, nothing will change. We have to be careful when playing a game that qualifies for both v1 and v2, because if a team should switch, we may be playing both sides later in the series, or we could even start out on both sides. The system will count all games as wins/losses, how you play them is your discretion. If not otherwise marked, the play will be v1.

[NZT-48]

Hagball, why does JM email say official is 17-0 and unofficial is 23-1? Which play is he not counting official that we did? Thanks.

u read it wrong sir although he did indeed lose one unofficial play b/c we went to a "D Bet" that to me counted as a loss b/c of that made up bs rule JM he suddenly started and that he injected on that Padres vs Phillies series a few days back

[Wallco99]

u read it wrong sir although he did indeed lose one unofficial play b/c we went to a "D Bet" that to me counted as a loss b/c of that made up bs rule JM he suddenly started and that he injected on that Padres vs Phillies series a few days back

It's six posts up, it is VERY clear. I did not read it wrong. It says what I said.

[NZT-48]

It's six posts up, it is VERY clear. I did not read it wrong. It says what I said.

calm down bro I was referring to what hagball record says not what JM says in his official email post that your referring to obviously

they both say just the opposite of each other is all but they both are wrong in all respective honesty we've lost one series each in v1.0 both officially and unofficially

understand now? that should clear things up and if you wanna know what series they are I can post that too

and no folks I dont go past a C bet JM system is built upon a 3 game progression period the end it always has been in all of his systems and all of his sports

[hagball52]

Hagball, why does JM email say official is 17-0 and unofficial is 23-1? Which play is he not counting official that we did? Thanks.

He moved the Yankees/Red Sox to unofficial after the Yanks were swept and lost the (C) bet. He sent out all 3 plays as official and then after it lost declared it unofficial because the rpi fell below the recommended level. We decided to score the loss official because he sent out all 3 plays as official. This is where JM gets wiggly with his record. That is one of the reasons we have this thread is to keep it real. As the season progresses there may be more inaccuracies but the real record will be kept here.

P.S. The rule ammendment about the (D) bet was there before the season started so we have to allow it. It's his system, he can make all the rules he wants. We are just gonna keep him honest with the results.

[G's pks]

Ok guys lets stick to the topic...

[Wallco99]

calm down bro I was referring to what hagball record says not what JM says in his official email post that your referring to obviously

they both say just the opposite of each other is all but they both are wrong in all respective honesty we've lost one series each in v1.0 both officially and unofficially

understand now? that should clear things up and if you wanna know what series they are I can post that too

and no folks I dont go past a C bet JM system is built upon a 3 game progression period the end it always has been in all of his systems and all of his sports

I'm not getting mean, just repeating what I saw. Sorry.

[Wallco99]

He moved the Yankees/Red Sox to unofficial after the Yanks were swept and lost the (C) bet. He sent out all 3 plays as official and then after it lost declared it unofficial because the rpi fell below the recommended level. We decided to score the loss official because he sent out all 3 plays as official. This is where JM gets wiggly with his record. That is one of the reasons we have this thread is to keep it real. As the season progresses there may be more inaccuracies but the real record will be kept here.

P.S. The rule ammendment about the (D) bet was there before the season started so we have to allow it. It's his system, he can make all the rules he wants. We are just gonna keep him honest with the results.

Thank you. That was all I wanted to know. Very simple.

[Wallco99]

Ok guys lets stick to the topic...

This is the topic.

[SportsTerminator]

I wasn't on this but... A bet St. Louis +1.5 -200... what a joke...

[Andy3568]

Well tonight just sucked.

[Wallco99]

Well tonight just sucked.

That is an understatement!

[sunzal]

Ok guys lets stick to the topic...

You see g, in some threads keeping an honest record is a relevant topic.....

[J.M. Disciple]

Tonight even sucked for labby players i went 3-11 if i include my tennis results. Its ok though cause there are more tennis matches in a hour... Try and clear 1/2 my 12 # line hopefully... Starting to really get out of control now.

Just another day where a .5% unit size as recommended by some players earlier in the season would come in very good handy. Once I finish clearing this line unless some absolute BS happens; I will be dropping my unit size back down.

When you try to get too agressive with your bankroll and yes even when you are using the labby there is still a potential of busting.

Once I finish clearing this line my new labby lines are going to start with .5% four #s each line and i will use a flexible 2-3-4 strike labby similar to what Attari is doing. I tried to mimick him at the beginning and stuck 2% each line, but lines are just crazy right now.

MONEY MANAGEMENT
MONEY MANAGEMENT
MONEY MANAGEMENT
MONEY MANAGEMENT
MONEY MANAGEMENT
MONEY MANAGEMENT
MONEY MANAGEMENT
MONEY MANAGEMENT
MONEY MANAGEMENT


__JMD

GL EVERYONE!

[Wallco99]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$
2011 System to date: 161-12 (v2: 19-1)
System profit/loss: +20.93 units (finished series)
Since my first post: +0.66 units (146-12) (fin. series)
Current open series: 8 (-16.72 units)

(8/1/11):
#173 N.Y. Mets (-1½) v2 (C) - Loss
#174 Pittsburgh (-1½) v2 (B) - Loss
#175 Milwaukee (-1½) v2 (B) - Win
#176 Cincinnati (M/L) (A) - Loss
#177 Cincinnati (-1½) (A) - Loss
#178 Chicago White Sox (M/L) (A) - Loss
#179 Colorado (M/L) (A) - Loss
#180 Pittsburgh (M/L) (A) - Loss
#181 Pittsburgh (-1½) (A) - Loss

(A) 88-93
(B) 39-48
(C) 22-25
(D) 12-12


Games for (8/2/11):
#173 Florida @ N.Y. Mets (-1½) v2 (D) (7:10 pm EDT)
#174 Chicago Cubs @ Pittsburgh (-1½) v2 (C) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)
#176 Cincinnati (M/L) @ Houston (B) (8:05 pm EDT)
#177 Cincinnati (-1½) @ Houston (B) (8:05 pm EDT)
#178 N.Y. Yankees @ Chicago White Sox (M/L) (B) (8:10 pm EDT)
#179 Philadelphia @ Colorado (M/L) (B) (8:40 pm EDT)
#180 Chicago Cubs @ Pittsburgh (M/L) (B) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)
#181 Chicago Cubs @ Pittsburgh (-1½) (B) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)



** Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “Official” appears next to the game. All lines and standings are based on final lines from ScoresandOdds.com. Some of the unofficial plays may change to the other team by game time. Official plays will not change. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, buy the alternate line for (-1½) on the team I have listed at (-1½), not the other team. NEVER PLAY (+1½) LINE ON ANY GAME IN THIS SYSTEM.
System backtest can be found in post #3446.

The v1 plays may change to the other team by game time. The v2 plays will not change teams, but may change (M/L) or (R/L), the team will usually remain the same. Once Official, nothing will change. We have to be careful when playing a game that qualifies for both v1 and v2, because if a team should switch, we may be playing both sides later in the series, or we could even start out on both sides. The system will count all games as wins/losses, how you play them is your discretion. If not otherwise marked, the play will be v1.

[G's pks]

JM Disciple it is always about money management and not overbetting....hopefully you guys get a bounce back day.... August is usually a good time to start reducing plays not increasing...and when September hits often a good time to end most systems...but I understand several things about systems like JM and others trying to sell a system...if they are not pumping out plays the customers are not happy...

What are signs of system failure though? Increased plays to try to conceal losses to claim a winning season...and or a large increase in bet size... I do not see those factors with JM so I give that system credit...but obviously in the other system here it has not only relied way to much on winning c or d bets which often it has failed at...but also has fallen victim to the increase of plays to show a profit...

A good example on a day after going 1-8...lets discuss numbers that are never shown here....can someone...anyone tell me what the amount of risk is today and the amount of reward after the 8 losses total...also with the chance more plays are dumped in today once again to conceal the losses...

Obviously the number following the thread on one side has declined greatly...but if JM on the other hand would stop trying to conceal a loss once in a while at least he has done ok...but obviously that does not get him subscribers...

Well guys be careful obviously some of you will have to stretch your pockets again today to recover some large losses...but hopefully you get that bounce back day...do not want to see that June massacre again losing over 40 units ...when there were several that said they were wiped out for the year...and that was just ignored...

From what I have read..some feel the JM picks have been to limited... What I see here is possible over filtering...which I am often a victim of myself...and the reason he now does the unoffical picks...kind of like listing leans then taking credit only if they win...but if it sells and I guess it does to some... he will continue to do it...

Just a word of caution... I would expect the system that went 1-8 to get some kind of a bounce but obviously when you see a system down 17 units in realtime something is not working. Pulling for the few of you that seem to have a large risk/reward on the line today to come through....also surprised on the otherhand the lack of response for the purpose this thread was made JM....

[bauerranch]

Cubs will have a hard time winning three in a row. Should be back on track tonight

BOL to all

[bauerranch]

JM Disciple it is always about money management and not overbetting....hopefully you guys get a bounce back day.... August is usually a good time to start reducing plays not increasing...and when September hits often a good time to end most systems...but I understand several things about systems like JM and others trying to sell a system...if they are not pumping out plays the customers are not happy...

From what I have read..some feel the JM picks have been to limited... What I see here is possible over filtering...which I am often a victim of myself...and the reason he now does the unoffical picks...kind of like listing leans then taking credit only if they win...but if it sells and I guess it does to some... he will continue to do it...

Just a word of caution... I would expect the system that went 1-8 to get some kind of a bounce but obviously when you see a system down 17 units in realtime something is not working. Pulling for the few of you that seem to have a large risk/reward on the line today to come through....also surprised on the otherhand the lack of response for the purpose this thread was made JM....

Did your one play win last night ?

[hagball52]

JM MLB System

2011 Official season series record 17-1 (v1) (2 series pending)
(A) 11-9
(B) 4-3
(C) 2-1
V2 plays 5-4
V3 system 3-1
Unofficial series 23-0

Official
(8/01/2011) St Louis (.494)@ Milwaukee (.508) R/L (A) Loss
(8/01/2011) San Diego (.480) v LA Dodgers (.483) R/L (A) Loss

Next Plays
Official
(8/02/2011) St Louis (.494) @ Milwaukee (.509) R/L (B) (8/03 (C) if necc.)
(8/02/2011) San Diego (.478) v LA Dodgers (.484) M/L (B) V2 (8/03) (C) if necc.) **
(8/02/2011) Kansas City (.479)v Baltimore (.482) M/L (A) (3 gm set (C) if necc.)
**Also SDG is a slight favorite so according to JM's rules you should take them +1.5 on the alternate run line.

Upcoming Plays
(8/05/2011) Cleveland @ Texas
(8/05/2011) Seattle @ LA Angels
(8/05/2011) Houston v Milwaukee
(8/05/2011) NY Yankees @ Boston *

Notes: Rough night for everyone last night. JM, Wallco and me. Even the almighty G had a loss. It opens the door for a great day today.This is where all of JM's B.S. rules get confusing. SDG is a V2 play which makes them a real strong play but yet they are only a slight favorite (under -115) so according to his bevy of filters you shoud bet them alternate run line which would put the juice through the roof. Personally I think STL and SDG are going to win a game so I will play them money line. If you wish to play by JM's rules go ahead and lay all that money out there he's having a great year. GL all

* On that NYY/BOS series I'm not sure if Morrison will call it a play because that was the second time the Yanks were swept this year by the Sox. A few people have mentioned it won't be a play but I have seen in the past where it is. We'll wait and see what JM does. Personally I think it will be a great play even if it's not a Morrison play. Sweeping a good team 3 times in a row is next to impossible.

[G's pks]

Did your one play win last night ?

I mention avoiding the big favs like Boston and continue to pick mainly under -150 favs would you like me to tell you my record since the break?

I had one play at the minimum at -136...a little different than what is happening in here... But instead of trying to turn the discussion into something silly...

I will just say I hope you guys win all 8! Seriously you guys deserve a bounce back...but Monday has been a tricky day all year and one not to have tons of plays on...rooting for you guys to have a nice run so the thread finishes up... GL...

[G's pks]

Hagball I had a loss on a -136 fav on the minimum bet I make...it is all about hitting your spots...and knowing when to back off...be realistic and expect losses...but try to keep the losses to a minimum...but I can see intelligent conversation is not going to be a priority in here again today so I will just wish you guys the best... Remember the old saying "If it ain't broke don't fix it"... Well one of the systems in here is broke and could use some repair... Later guys and hopefully you go 8-0....

[hagball52]

Hagball I had a loss on a -136 fav on the minimum bet I make...it is all about hitting your spots...and knowing when to back off...be realistic and expect losses...but try to keep the losses to a minimum...but I can see intelligent conversation is not going to be a priority in here again today so I will just wish you guys the best... Remember the old saying "If it ain't broke don't fix it"... Well one of the systems in here is broke and could use some repair... Later guys and hopefully you go 8-0....

I was just commenting on how everyone had a down night. If you only make one pick and it loses that is also not a good night no matter what the line was. Let's all bounce back and get it done today.

[hagball52]

I just want to comment on the JM play today with St Louis. I failed to mention the rpi is at the point where it will no longer be an official play if they lose today. It is right at the breaking point (.015).

[Wallco99]

JM Disciple it is always about money management and not overbetting....hopefully you guys get a bounce back day.... August is usually a good time to start reducing plays not increasing...and when September hits often a good time to end most systems...but I understand several things about systems like JM and others trying to sell a system...if they are not pumping out plays the customers are not happy...

What are signs of system failure though? Increased plays to try to conceal losses to claim a winning season...and or a large increase in bet size... I do not see those factors with JM so I give that system credit...but obviously in the other system here it has not only relied way to much on winning c or d bets which often it has failed at...but also has fallen victim to the increase of plays to show a profit...

A good example on a day after going 1-8...lets discuss numbers that are never shown here....can someone...anyone tell me what the amount of risk is today and the amount of reward after the 8 losses total...also with the chance more plays are dumped in today once again to conceal the losses...

Obviously the number following the thread on one side has declined greatly...but if JM on the other hand would stop trying to conceal a loss once in a while at least he has done ok...but obviously that does not get him subscribers...

Well guys be careful obviously some of you will have to stretch your pockets again today to recover some large losses...but hopefully you get that bounce back day...do not want to see that June massacre again losing over 40 units ...when there were several that said they were wiped out for the year...and that was just ignored...

From what I have read..some feel the JM picks have been to limited... What I see here is possible over filtering...which I am often a victim of myself...and the reason he now does the unoffical picks...kind of like listing leans then taking credit only if they win...but if it sells and I guess it does to some... he will continue to do it...

Just a word of caution... I would expect the system that went 1-8 to get some kind of a bounce but obviously when you see a system down 17 units in realtime something is not working. Pulling for the few of you that seem to have a large risk/reward on the line today to come through....also surprised on the otherhand the lack of response for the purpose this thread was made JM....

Whatever!

[GGPLAYER]

Let's make it rain today

[lawalahmed]

I just want to comment on the JM play today with St Louis. I failed to mention the rpi is at the point where it will no longer be an official play if they lose today. It is right at the breaking point (.015).

This series should call COMBO ( Combination of official and Unofficial series) if Win JM will add it to official but if lost, Jm will throw it to Unofficial Archive!

[lawalahmed]

Eish! Double post

[Glada Tartan]

St Louis turn today!!

[Wallco99]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$ - Plays for 8/2/11
2011 System to date: 161-12 (v2: 19-1)
System profit/loss: +20.93 units (finished series)
Since my first post: +0.66 units (146-12) (fin. series)
Current open series: 8 (-16.72 units)


#173 Florida @ N.Y. Mets (-1½) v2 (D) *Official* (7:10 pm EDT)
#174 Chicago Cubs @ Pittsburgh (-1½) v2 (C) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)
#176 Cincinnati (M/L) @ Houston (B) *Official* (8:05 pm EDT)
#177 Cincinnati (-1½) @ Houston (B) *Official* (8:05 pm EDT)
#178 N.Y. Yankees (M/L) @ Chicago White Sox (B) *Official* (8:10 pm EDT)
#179 Philadelphia @ Colorado (M/L) (B) *Official* (8:40 pm EDT)
#180 Chicago Cubs @ Pittsburgh (M/L) (B) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)
#181 Chicago Cubs @ Pittsburgh (-1½) (B) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)

** Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “Official” appears next to the game. All lines and standings are based on final lines from ScoresandOdds.com. Some of the unofficial plays may change to the other team by game time. Official plays will not change. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, buy the alternate line for (-1½) on the team I have listed at (-1½), not the other team. NEVER PLAY (+1½) LINE ON ANY GAME IN THIS SYSTEM.
System backtest can be found in post #3446.

The v1 plays may change to the other team by game time. The v2 plays will not change teams, but may change (M/L) or (R/L), the team will usually remain the same. Once Official, nothing will change. We have to be careful when playing a game that qualifies for both v1 and v2, because if a team should switch, we may be playing both sides later in the series, or we could even start out on both sides. The system will count all games as wins/losses, how you play them is your discretion. If not otherwise marked, the play will be v1.

[NZT-48]

so I guess the protoccol is the alt run line for the Padres uh? lameo man it really is I think I may pass dont know what others think but the juice is ridiculous so ML for me then

besides Im at heritage now for the moment on this bet and they got like $500 limit on alt line gee thanks

I guess they could raise it but just dont know at this time is all

[Wallco99]

so I guess the protoccol is the alt run line for the Padres uh? lameo man it really is I think I may pass dont know what others think but the juice is ridiculous so ML for me then

besides Im at heritage now for the moment on this bet and they got like $500 limit on alt line gee thanks

I guess they could raise it but just dont know at this time is all

Nah, -105 is good enough for me.