Ryangene's Plays

[Imgoinhungry]

Eastern Michigan = joke. Not sure how so many "pros" could be on a team that is 4-10 to cover against northern illinois.

[Bigboy44]

I can tell you right now this does not work! I decided to play against all your plays tonight lets see how I do. Good luck to you but I have to make some of the money back I have lost the last three weeks following your picks. Just for tonight bet quite a bit more than I usually do.

Holy shit you are 3-0

[Bigboy44]

I can tell you right now this does not work! I decided to play against all your plays tonight lets see how I do. Good luck to you but I have to make some of the money back I have lost the last three weeks following your picks. Just for tonight bet quite a bit more than I usually do.

5-0. Kenny great move.. Ryangene I really hope you aren't betting these games.. Because you do put time into these lists..

[repski]

I can tell you right now this does not work! I decided to play against all your plays tonight lets see how I do. Good luck to you but I have to make some of the money back I have lost the last three weeks following your picks. Just for tonight bet quite a bit more than I usually do.

not a fan of thread crapping...ryan puts in hard work and i thank him, but there is a contrarian angle one could approach.,,,many make money betting against the herd.

[Cannon]

Greatest system of picking stinky losers ever.

[G's pks]

I can tell you right now this does not work! I decided to play against all your plays tonight lets see how I do. Good luck to you but I have to make some of the money back I have lost the last three weeks following your picks. Just for tonight bet quite a bit more than I usually do.

Any night the last month doing this would have worked except one or two...but you picked a good one!

[Bigboy44]

Any night the last month doing this would have worked except one or two...but you picked a good one!

Yes you picked a good one Kenny...This system is alot of work to keep up and with over 1000 bets in 45-50 days no one will ever win...If one was to bet 100 per play he would be minus money... I played it for a couple days, then I put my crack pipe down and came to the realization that this will never work...

[demens]

Just came across this yesterday, def happy someone is putting in the work i was thinking about doing something like this. I really do believe that 2 brains is better then 1, so if multiple pros agree on a pick i think its better to go with that.

I've never really checked the service plays forum prior to the last few days. 1 problem i see is that there are way too many 'pro', there is like a new thread every minute with what seem like random picks by some random guy. Its def a good idea to go with the majority of the top guys but who ARE the top guys? I have no clue, everyone is bitching about fake records and stuff, it'll probably take me a while. So i hope the people included in this list here are all legit guys worth trusting. I do this for CBB following a few posters on the forum, will not cross reference those picks with the picks in the thread here. Pros vs Joes type of thing.

ANyway, GL with this, keep up the hard work.

[demens]

Wanted to add a few things. Even with the fake records and all, most of these pros are just barely staying around 50%, but seem to be up plenty, so i'm guessing they hit the big ones. So when you do this comparison do you take that into consideration?

For example. Lets say a good capper has a 10x play on team A and a crappy capper has a 1x play on the oppenent. thats not really 1 to 1. Same goes for if lets say 6 crappy cappers are on team A for 1x each, and 2 solid guys are on the opponent for 10x each. I wouldn't play team A cause it has 4 services on its side.

[Bigboy44]

Wanted to add a few things. Even with the fake records and all, most of these pros are just barely staying around 50%, but seem to be up plenty, so i'm guessing they hit the big ones. So when you do this comparison do you take that into consideration? For example. Lets say a good capper has a 10x play on team A and a crappy capper has a 1x play on the oppenent. thats not really 1 to 1. Same goes for if lets say 6 crappy cappers are on team A for 1x each, and 2 solid guys are on the opponent for 10x each. I wouldn't play team A cause it has 4 services on its side.

Good thinking....its just so hard to play 8-15 games a day and win..

[Ryangene]

So far but still updating will see if something else shows up...

Villanova (8)
Missouri(10)
Memphis(4)
Colorado State(4)

[Ryangene]

Fade or Follow whatever you are playing folks here are the rest.

Maryland(6)
SanDiegoSt(10)


From now on you will also see the ( # ) in parentheses that will be there to help those that have chosen to do 6+, 8+ or whatever amount you are choosing to play.

[KennyM10]

Not betting against you tonight but cleaned up yesterday doing it. Way too many games with juice to ever make this a winning system. Thanks for the terrible picks again yesterday, your loss was my gain, will root for you tonight Bobbyjean.

[Bigboy44]

2-2 so far.. I smell a 4-2 for you ryangene..

[sunshine777]

So today the only play was Maryland -13.5. This is using Ryans Thread with Team Ranking. I will make sure to post before the games start tomorrow. The system went 1-1 yesterday and is still winning over the last week following it. Keep up the great work Ryan and I will make sure to put the Teamranking plays for everyone as this combination has been working solid since Ryan started the thread. BOL

[Ryangene]

TY SS777 for doing this. Points that are thrown my way I'll be taking the top two teams putting together a parlay and getting you those points tonight when it hits!

[Ryangene]

for past 46 days....


When 4 Or more Services---- 177 wins / 164 Losses
When 5 Or more Services--136 wins / 120 losses
When 6 Or more Services--99 wins /82 losses
When 7 Or more Services-- 72 wins / 70 losses
When 8 Or more Services-- 58 wins / 56 losses
When 9 Or more Services-- 48 wins / 42 losses

[Ryangene]

EARLY STARTS 6PM CST

Miami (OH) (4)== WON
Purdue (6)--- lost
Mississippi State (6)== WON
Providence (5)-- lost
Old Dominion (7)--- lost

[sunshine777]

So the only early play is Purdue -2.5 using Teamranking/Ryan. I'm going to play it at 3% of my bankroll. BOL

[Ryangene]

WI-Green Bay (10)== Won
Oregon State (10)**-lost
Pepperdine (6)== Won
New Mexico State (6)== Won
North Carolina (12) -lost
Santa Clara (6) == Won

Oklahoma City(8) ** == Won


Thats the LATER games.

[sunshine777]

So from all the plays the only 2 that fit the System are

Purdue -2.5
Santa Clara -6.5

Lets make some money tonight. BOL

[Ryangene]

Thanks Bud, I put those two teams in a parlay tonight for you, if it hits I'm sending the points your way! GL

[G's pks]

EARLY STARTS 6PM CST

Miami (OH) (4)== WON
Purdue (6)--- lost
Mississippi State (6) **playing**
Providence (5)-- lost
Old Dominion (7)--- lost

ouch! hopefully you guys rebound on your late games to cut your losses a little...

[sunshine777]

1-1 today with the Teamranking System play. We live to play another day. Thanks Ryan keep up the good work these systems plays are hitting.

[Ryangene]

ouch! hopefully you guys rebound on your late games to cut your losses a little...

2-3 and you are writing this crap? Get a life.

if you pay attention you'd know what was happening... guess you dont know the rankings system yet. If you have nothing nice to say I'd guess you just as well stay away. If you claim to do something like this come baseball time i'm sure you are going to get hundreds of haters trashing your topic... just an fyi warning.

[Ryangene]

for past 47 days....


When 4 Or more Services---- 184 wins / 169 Losses
When 5 Or more Services--142 wins / 125 losses
When 6 Or more Services--105 wins /86 losses
When 7 Or more Services-- 74 wins / 73 losses
When 8 Or more Services-- 60 wins / 58 losses
When 9 Or more Services-- 49 wins / 44 losses

SunShine you able to post the records for the rankings systems as well? And how far back are you able to go and post?

[Ryangene]

http://forum.sbrforum.com/service-plays/891325-tons-services-1-14-11-a.html#post8357675

[sunshine777]

Ok. So here is the record to date using Teamranking/Ryans. This is tracked from the beginning of this thread.

115-45 71%

Here are the potential plays for today if 4 or more services are on a side.

CBB
Siena 45%

NBA
LA Lakers 50%
Boston 23%
San Antonio 45%
New York 27%
Utah 39%
Chicago 27%

So if any of these games have 4 or more services on there side it will be a play tonight. Thanks Ryan for doing hard work.

[demens]

What is this teamranking?

[sunshine777]

It is a website that we use as a reference with Ryan's thread to determine the daily picks. As you can see from the record it is pretty solid. We will see how long it will last but riding the train while it is hitting.

What is this teamranking?

[demens]

I know the site, i was asking what the system is. Found it anyway, comparing efficiency stats but i cant find them on the site???

[Kaan]

Fairly confused as to how your system works? Could you explain?

[sunshine777]

If there is 4 or more services on one side from Ryans Thread that is the first step. Then we go to teamranking and check the efficiency stats. For CBB if it is over 33% it is a play. For NBA if it is 22% we play. Purdue was a mistake last night and shouldn't have been a play and that is my bad because it wasn't 33% or above. The potential plays above will be plays over if Ryans thread has 4 or more services on one side.

[Kaan]

So for example if 4 or more services are on the Lakers side, you will play the over, or the point spread?

[demens]

If there is 4 or more services on one side from Ryans Thread that is the first step. Then we go to teamranking and check the efficiency stats. For CBB if it is over 33% it is a play. For NBA if it is 22% we play. Purdue was a mistake last night and shouldn't have been a play and that is my bad because it wasn't 33% or above. The potential plays above will be plays over if Ryans thread has 4 or more services on one side.

Dude, honestly if you dont want to explain then dont. Because this half ass explanation is like no explanation at all.

1st, what efficiency stats? there are a million different efficiency stats. Then what does "if its over 33%" mean? Efficiency over 33%? 1 teams offensive eff as compared to the others defensive over 33%, what?