My Sports

[nulldah]

Getting a new IP from your ISP is fairly easy, especially if they are using DHCP.

well, depends on how easy/difficult for the mods to ban IP (is it just a button or bunch of pages to go through?)

For dynamic IP, again, to what extent SBR want to deal with it. Just let it go or do some serious sh*t bout it.

I've come across some forums/irc that ban whole IP from my ISP and I have to go through all the problem with the mods to be inside exception list, well, the information inside is worth it after all. This is just example.

[sneakerhead]

Thanks man. People really need to take it for real. If you are betting in +EV spots, its not as simple as losing 3 games in a row and then winning 4. Sometimes you lose 30 in a row and then win 40. Need to be able to absorb the losing streaks comfortably. I hope the graph illustrates this to many who don't understand that.

Great graph bro, wanted to know what the K signifies on the x axis, I know the y axis is money but is this graph money vs money? shouldnt it be time vs money or something?

[robert_wrath]

Not to worry, its still early in the season for football plays. On to week 4 we go.

[latinrus]

It is what it is..

Ya saw the game, every turnover GB created, refs throw a flag.

18 flags, most for GB in over 50 years. But like i said, it is what it is..

All the guys coming in here to laugh in my face, GO AHEAD. I'll continue to post my plays for ya to fade and cash and laugh all the way to the bank.

Tough day what else can I say! Unreal things happening! Don't even going to mention it, everybody saw the games yesterday. Today 100000000 penalties and the last play just sick thing!

But I've been making money with U Paco! And wanna thank u for that! We can't win every play! But we'll be winning more!

Fvck the hatters!

And keep going Paco u r a nice guy

[Styles]

Don't worry about it Paco.. I'm positive we will make that back and then some this week..

[hun088tir]

very interesting graph, ty

[paste_me]

You don't get to $600,000 without losing $150,000 along the way. Gambling has Variance boys. Be ready for it.

nice

[lamp9fran]

$600,000 ? wowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

[lamp9fran]

but losing $150,000 is a little bad..

[Pride]

but losing $150,000 is a little bad..

except it isnt

[paco]

Bills Under 37.5 (1x)

Ravens Under 35 (0.5x)



Just getting these in for a little cuz I think the #'s will drop.

[svenodds]

keep up the good work

[hotcheetos]

new here, thanks in advance

[Meyhem]

gonna get back into baseball anytime soon pac?

[A's Fan]

Great graph bro, wanted to know what the K signifies on the x axis, I know the y axis is money but is this graph money vs money? shouldnt it be time vs money or something?

Sapidocs graph looks more like a poker graph than a sportsbetting graph, hands played would be on the x asis. That is actually a super solid graph and you must be a 3ptbb/100+ winner to have that little variance.

regarding todays game, green bay was the correct pick, green bay dominated that game and green bay-3 hits there 60%+ of the time

[memo99]

A poster here told me the other day that Only successful people get haters.

Let them get there laughs in.

exactly don't let him get to ya man just an immature little punk ass b*tch

[memo99]

already on the under 34.5 on pitts/bal

[memo99]

what do you think about 49'ers +6.5,skins +6,and rams +1 or is it too early do you think those #'s will go down

[JMobile]

gonna get back into baseball anytime soon pac?

Only when Playoffs comes in.

[brucethebear]

regarding todays game, green bay was the correct pick, green bay dominated that game and green bay-3 hits there 60%+ of the time

+1.
How many of us at quarter time thought GB was going to give the Bears a football lesson?

A lot of the 50/50 balls went against GB. The pick was right - it just didn't work out today.
Plenty more cash to be made Paco.
We're with you bro. Just keep doing your thing and don't feed the trolls.

BtB

[Kemalettin]

[Junoumi]

What about Eagles - Redskins over 42 ? Both teams score a lot of points. Vick looks very good in last games and week ago when Eagles played with a Packers.
Any opinion ?
Btw: Sorry for mistakes, english is not my root language

[Tommy_de1st]

Pac - class act

[kilochs]

already on the under 34.5 on pitts/bal: with you

[SRBI]

Careful with the Packers tonight boys...this forum has officially gone cold, and with all respect to my niqqa paco, I'm dumpin $500 on the Bears spread.

Good luck to everyone tonight.

Hope the burial is done, cause a lot of ppl are so deep right now they'll never climb back.

Lang has a 30 dime play on the Packers

I'm not the type to rub it in, but Lang having a 30 dime play on GB should have told you all you needed to know.

Sorry pac.

[rjc]

Just watching the replay of the green bay game, where the fvck was the disapline from the chesse dics

[sapidoc]

Is that your bankroll sapidoc?

Not my graph. A graph from of a friend of mine.

Great graph bro, wanted to know what the K signifies on the x axis, I know the y axis is money but is this graph money vs money? shouldnt it be time vs money or something?

K just means "thousand". So Y-axis has $ (dollars) and the X-axes has 28K, 56K, etc. (It actually is a poker graph and the x-axis represents the hand number. (ie. 389K hands of online poker, and $600,000 at the end).

Sapidocs graph looks more like a poker graph than a sportsbetting graph, hands played would be on the x asis. That is actually a super solid graph and you must be a 3ptbb/100+ winner to have that little variance. regarding todays game, green bay was the correct pick, green bay dominated that game and green bay-3 hits there 60%+ of the time

Exactly.

And yes sick graph; again, not mine. But obviously a super solid player. OMG how could a super solid poker player go on a $150,000 downswing? Variance.

[edimax]

Bills Under 37.5 (1x)

Ravens Under 35 (0.5x)



Just getting these in for a little cuz I think the #'s will drop.

Thank you for the plays for today.. BOL for the matches...

[DC]

Can someone please explain to me why the philly's line is only -125 vs the mats? Oswalt vs Marquis. Is this an early x-mas gift from Vegas?no really looks like the line should be double that! I must be missing something, what is it?

[DC]

11 days ago Philly hammered Marquis! 6 runs in 1/3 of an inning! Era over 7 for Marquis! Someone please tell me why I should not unload on Philly

[Holdin Aces]

11 days ago Philly hammered Marquis! 6 runs in 1/3 of an inning! Era over 7 for Marquis! Someone please tell me why I should not unload on Philly

I looked at pitching matchups but not the lines and thought that Philly would be -250. The only thing I will say is the Nats have hit Oswalt pretty good at times and them coming off clinching the division is the only reason I could see this line being this low. I would wait and check the lineups before making a play.

[Bluedragon]

11 days ago Philly hammered Marquis! 6 runs in 1/3 of an inning! Era over 7 for Marquis! Someone please tell me why I should not unload on Philly

When I woke up...I said the same thing. Oswalt can poop the sleeping-bag sometimes but this doesn't feel like one of those nights...

[glassjoe]

When I woke up...I said the same thing. Oswalt can poop the sleeping-bag sometimes but this doesn't feel like one of those nights...

Keep in mind guys that the Phillies did clinch last night and were celebrating through the night. With just one more win with about 5 games left in the season, they will clinch home field through out. I envision that Manuel will give some of his players a day off tonight.

oh and Paco.. I just started following you this past weekend. And 80% of the time, you were on the right team... So keep on keeping on... the man this week.

[investor]

morning everyone

[Hazious]

'morning investor....

does anybody like the o3 +105 in the chelsea / marseille game?