MLB Picks - Wednesday, 9/1/21

LT Profits · 09-01-21, 10:31 AM

1 MLB Pick Addition

2 MLB Plays Wednesday

Diamondbacks +189 (Heritage)
Braves / Dodgers UNDER 7.5 -103 (Heritage)

StackinGreen · 09-01-21, 12:44 PM

Let's ride bro, I'm with you.

LT Profits · 09-01-21, 12:47 PM

Another MLB Pick Addition

3 MLB Plays Wednesday

Diamondbacks +189 (Heritage)
Yankees / Angels OVER 8.5 -110 (Bookmaker)
Braves / Dodgers UNDER 7.5 -103 (Heritage)

StackinGreen · 09-01-21, 02:05 PM

Keep'em coming

LT Profits · 09-01-21, 03:55 PM

Originally posted by StackinGreen

Keep'em coming

Might be done, will do one more sweep in about an hour

StackinGreen · 09-01-21, 04:03 PM

Nailing that +193 Dbacks ... lets hope they hold! Im RRing that and the others too (;

Brock Landers · 09-01-21, 04:50 PM

You're proving how clueless you are with that Yankees total play.

I guess you know nothing about 4:00 start times in Anaheim and why those games are auto unders.

Didn't think you'd know

LT Profits · 09-01-21, 05:17 PM

Originally posted by Brock Landers

You're proving how clueless you are with that Yankees total play.

I guess you know nothing about 4:00 start times in Anaheim and why those games are auto unders.

Didn't think you'd know

Twilight in Anaheim factor USED TO be great angle before the public got wind of it, now it is built in to line and seemingly overblown and is actually giving more value to the Over, as it is not enough of a reason for this total to be full run lower than last night's given Angels' gas-can pitching projection here.

Nice try at a quasi-constructive post though

jjgold · 09-01-21, 05:27 PM

Lt best of luck tonight

Stanton might be off

Brock Landers · 09-01-21, 05:29 PM

Originally posted by LT Profits

Twilight in Anaheim factor USED TO be great angle before the public got wind of it, now it is built in to line and seemingly overblown and is actually giving more value to the Over, as it is not enough of a reason for this total to be full run lower than last night's given Angels' gas-can pitching projection here.

Nice try at a quasi-constructive post though

It's not built into the line you dope.

The total isn't any different there depending on game time start.

Nice try sounding "smart"

LT Profits · 09-01-21, 05:43 PM

Originally posted by Brock Landers

It's not built into the line you dope.

The total isn't any different there depending on game time start.

Nice try sounding "smart"

Yes it ABSOLUTELY is. This was a highly publicized angle quite a while ago, and the books adjusted after getting raped on Twilight Anaheim Unders back in the day, that ship has sailed. Not true of all stadiums but certainly true of Anaheim.

LT Profits · 09-01-21, 05:47 PM

Originally posted by LT Profits

Might be done, will do one more sweep in about an hour

Confirmed, just the 3 plays.

Brock Landers · 09-01-21, 06:12 PM

Originally posted by LT Profits

Yes it ABSOLUTELY is. This was a highly publicized angle quite a while ago, and the books adjusted after getting raped on Twilight Anaheim Unders back in the day, that ship has sailed. Not true of all stadiums but certainly true of Anaheim.

You're 100% full of shit

Brock Landers · 09-01-21, 06:30 PM

As if the line would be 9.5 if the game started 3 hours later lol

Only 2 parks adjust totals

Wrigley and Coors field

Regardless of your brain dead logic. The players CANT SEE THE BALL because of the glare off the center field rocks!

That's why 4:00 local starts are basically non existent now

LT Profits · 09-01-21, 07:33 PM

Originally posted by Brock Landers

As if the line would be 9.5 if the game started 3 hours later lol

Only 2 parks adjust totals

Wrigley and Coors field

Regardless of your brain dead logic. The players CANT SEE THE BALL because of the glare off the center field rocks!

That's why 4:00 local starts are basically non existent now

And you do not think books are aware of that and don't adjust accordingly for twilight starts? Seriously, YOU are the one that is delusional if you don't think books take that into account for those start times, especially given how highly publicized it was several years ago.

LT Profits · 09-01-21, 07:36 PM

Originally posted by Brock Landers

You're 100% full of shit

I am probably the least full of shit poster in SBR, 100% transparent while always keeping honest records. Then again, you are a disgraceful human being that can't appreciate that, so....

Brock Landers · 09-01-21, 07:56 PM

Originally posted by LT Profits

And you do not think books are aware of that and don't adjust accordingly for twilight starts? Seriously, YOU are the one that is delusional if you don't think books take that into account for those start times, especially given how highly publicized it was several years ago.

Nope, they don't. Not in that Stadium. There is NO adjustment.

And great call on that over. I've had this under circled for months.

You're real "sharp"

stake1 · 09-01-21, 08:46 PM

Post#18 is from a broke assed troll, who is a degenerate loser

stake1 · 09-01-21, 08:47 PM

Great call on Arizona today

MinnesotaFats · 09-01-21, 09:03 PM

Originally posted by Brock Landers

Nope, they don't. Not in that Stadium. There is NO adjustment.

And great call on that over. I've had this under circled for months.

You're real "sharp"

LOL

Circled for months

manny24 · 09-01-21, 09:08 PM

Originally posted by Brock Landers

Nope, they don't. Not in that Stadium. There is NO adjustment.

And great call on that over. I've had this under circled for months.

You're real "sharp"

you mean the zeros you wrote on Bobby's check ?

Brock Landers · 09-01-21, 09:18 PM

Originally posted by MinnesotaFats

LOL

Circled for months

What the f uck are you laughing about?

This is no bullshit, every season they play less and less of these games starting at 4:00 there because the players CAN'T SEE the ball due to glare.

I circle every angels home game starting at that time in March looking over the schedule.

Yankees 4
Angels 1

UNDER 8.5

stake1 · 09-01-21, 11:07 PM

Landers: you are some kind of low IQ dummy. Lt clearly told you to keep your scammer ass
out of his threads.
Hopefully he makes them “SBR pro” only going forward, so your kind is banned from posting your troll rubbish in them

stake1 · 09-01-21, 11:09 PM

Originally posted by MinnesotaFats

LOL

Circled for months

Only thing he “circles” is the date of his next circle jerk at Burger King with the store manager

LT Profits · 09-02-21, 06:19 AM

Originally posted by Brock Landers

Nope, they don't. Not in that Stadium. There is NO adjustment.

And great call on that over. I've had this under circled for months.

You're real "sharp"

The result of that one game has absolutely nothing to do with my point, which is that the total was deflated by the twilight start. You are acting as if the books are not aware of that angle. NEWSFLASH: the books are not dumb and have been adjusting for it evert since it became common knowledge. Not my problem if you do not accept that FACT.

Now I repeat, please stay out of my threads if you have nothing constructive to add. All I do is win every year (well not literally, but 9 out of 11 which would be 10 out of 12 if this holds up) yet all you do is continuously attack me and call "bullshit" when all my records are transparently kept in the forum for the world to publicly verify.

Oh and it was a winning 2-1 night

jjgold · 09-02-21, 06:20 AM

LT a winner

Landers a fukkin GAVONE

LT Profits · 09-02-21, 06:22 AM

Originally posted by stake1

Hopefully he makes them “SBR pro” only going forward, so your kind is banned from posting your troll rubbish in them

I considered this but that would not be fair to non-pros with legit questions.

Brock Landers · 09-02-21, 08:56 AM

Originally posted by LT Profits

The result of that one game has absolutely nothing to do with my point, which is that the total was deflated by the twilight start. You are acting as if the books are not aware of that angle. NEWSFLASH: the books are not dumb and have been adjusting for it evert since it became common knowledge. Not my problem if you do not accept that FACT.

Now I repeat, please stay out of my threads if you have nothing constructive to add. All I do is win every year (well not literally, but 9 out of 11 which would be 10 out of 12 if this holds up) yet all you do is continuously attack me and call "bullshit" when all my records are transparently kept in the forum for the world to publicly verify.

Oh and it was a winning 2-1 night

I'm not going to hear you spread bullshit and not call you out for it. Only a complete moron bet the over in that spot. The line was no different than a start 3 hours later and that is a fact. Go cry to the head of SBR for all I care.

MinnesotaFats · 09-02-21, 09:14 AM

<a href='https://postimg.cc/q68fJPPv' target='_blank'><img src='https://i.postimg.cc/0j49fxZD/Screenshot-20210902-091128-Samsung-Internet.jpg' border='0' alt='Screenshot-20210902-091128-Samsung-Internet'/></a>

Now it was 3-0 in the top 4th.

Doesn't jive w the "we can't see the ball off the glaring rocks" theory as the game was trending over in the early innings...

juicername · 09-02-21, 09:21 AM

Brock Landers is the third biggest dope on SBR after Morono and SmallDaddyQH.

RonT73 · 09-02-21, 09:32 AM

facts...

Originally posted by MinnesotaFats

<a rel='nofollow' href='https://postimg.cc/q68fJPPv' target='_blank'><img src='https://i.postimg.cc/0j49fxZD/Screenshot-20210902-091128-Samsung-Internet.jpg' border='0' alt='Screenshot-20210902-091128-Samsung-Internet'/></a>

Now it was 3-0 in the top 4th.

Doesn't jive w the "we can't see the ball off the glaring rocks" theory as the game was trending over in the early innings...

LT Profits · 09-02-21, 09:40 AM

Originally posted by Brock Landers

I'm not going to hear you spread bullshit and not call you out for it. Only a complete moron bet the over in that spot. The line was no different than a start 3 hours later and that is a fact. Go cry to the head of SBR for all I care.

You are 100% wrong, now stay the fukk out of my threads. YOU trying to lecture ME about how sportsbooks set lines is like Nathan Peterman giving advice to Patrick Mahomes on how to play quarterback, it is obvious you know ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about the subject.

LT Profits · 09-02-21, 09:45 AM

Originally posted by MinnesotaFats

<a rel='nofollow' href='https://postimg.cc/q68fJPPv' target='_blank'><img src='https://i.postimg.cc/0j49fxZD/Screenshot-20210902-091128-Samsung-Internet.jpg' border='0' alt='Screenshot-20210902-091128-Samsung-Internet'/></a>

Now it was 3-0 in the top 4th.

Doesn't jive w the "we can't see the ball off the glaring rocks" theory as the game was trending over in the early innings...

While this is true, it is not my main point, which is that totals for twilight games in Anaheim are indeed shaded a bit lower than those that start at other times, yet Landers does not see the light

Brock Landers · 09-02-21, 10:17 AM

Originally posted by LT Profits

While this is true, it is not my main point, which is that totals for twilight games in Anaheim are indeed shaded a bit lower than those that start at other times, yet Landers does not see the light

they're NOT and you keep spouting that bullshit. You have no proof of it, of course how could you prove something that doesn't exist