More Coming, I have only looked at Money Lines so far.
Conqueror
SBR Posting Legend
12-08-13
16778
#2
When you post only one play, we always know there's more coming (lol).
Thanks for all you do here!
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#3
4 MLB Plays
4 MLB Plays Wednesday
Braves / Pirates UNDER 7 +100 (Heritage)
Mariners / Orioles OVER 8 -110 (Heritage)
Rays +118 (Heritage)
Red Sox / Royals UNDER 7 +100 (Game #2) (Heritage)
Comment
44 Mag
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
10-14-13
34490
#4
How can you bet game #2 when game #1 hasn't even been played ???? Injuries, line up changes etc. Never mind changes, they might just start the bench players, never understood this.
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#5
Originally posted by 44 Mag
How can you bet game #2 when game #1 hasn't even been played ???? Injuries, line up changes etc. Never mind changes, they might just start the bench players, never understood this.
No different than betting any other game very early while some value is there. There are always lineup risks, comes with the territory for the early birds.
Comment
Jayvegas420
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
03-09-11
28213
#6
I prefer the pithing match up in the 2nd game as well.
GL LT
Comment
44 Mag
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
10-14-13
34490
#7
Originally posted by LT Profits
No different than betting any other game very early while some value is there. There are always lineup risks, comes with the territory for the early birds.
GL to you, still makes no sense to me. Guess that's why you are a professional.
Comment
SEAHAWKHARRY
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
11-29-07
26068
#8
Lt they just took the royals game 2 off the board do u know why??
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#9
Originally posted by SEAHAWKHARRY
Lt they just took the royals game 2 off the board do u know why??
What book?
Comment
SEAHAWKHARRY
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
11-29-07
26068
#10
Hrwager
Comment
RavensFan2k3
SBR Posting Legend
08-18-12
17378
#11
Do we like Boston winning game two?
Comment
PorkChop
SBR Hall of Famer
09-18-08
8193
#12
Originally posted by SEAHAWKHARRY
Lt they just took the royals game 2 off the board do u know why??
05/17/16 07:38:01pm
-145
+135
05/17/16 07:38:01pm
7
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#13
Originally posted by RavensFan2k3
Do we like Boston winning game two?
Yeah, 60%ers coming up.
Comment
RavensFan2k3
SBR Posting Legend
08-18-12
17378
#14
Originally posted by LT Profits
Yeah, 60%ers coming up.
Cool, no problem. Tampa for the sweep!
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#15
60%ers:
Detroit 60% (-150)
Oakland 61% (-156)
Pittsburgh 61% (-156)
Cubs 60% (-150)
St. Louis 62% (-163)
Boston 61% (-156) (Game #2)
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#16
Originally posted by SEAHAWKHARRY
Hrwager
I see it on the Live Lines right now without logging in, can't say if page is stale as I do not have an account there.
Comment
juicername
SBR Hall of Famer
10-14-15
6906
#17
What do you get for Giants/Padres if you don't mind me asking? Thanks.
Comment
RollinDo
SBR Posting Legend
09-04-13
13322
#18
Originally posted by 44 Mag
How can you bet game #2 when game #1 hasn't even been played ???? Injuries, line up changes etc. Never mind changes, they might just start the bench players, never understood this.
Yeah, I'm with ya here Mag...a lot depends on what happens in Gm 1...if it's a low score in Gm 1, probably the opposite in Gm 2 and vice-versa...maybe it's a bit different with totals, but I sure wouldn't bet a side for a Gm 2, as Gm 1 is a good indicator of who has a little better likelihood in Gm 2.
Comment
PorkChop
SBR Hall of Famer
09-18-08
8193
#19
Just read Kansas City is 5-0 in their last 5, of the first game in double-headers.
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#20
Originally posted by RollinDo
Yeah, I'm with ya here Mag...a lot depends on what happens in Gm 1...if it's a low score in Gm 1, probably the opposite in Gm 2 and vice-versa...maybe it's a bit different with totals, but I sure wouldn't bet a side for a Gm 2, as Gm 1 is a good indicator of who has a little better likelihood in Gm 2.
I disagree with this whole post, each game is its own entity and should be capped on its own merits. I have said several times that "streaks" do not really exist in terms of handicapping, expect for sometimes giving value to the opposite side of the streak.
Comment
7777KaL
SBR Sharp
04-13-16
383
#21
Originally posted by 44 Mag
GL to you, still makes no sense to me. Guess that's why you are a professional.
C'mon my boy, don't blow up his head even more now. Yes, he believes he is a professional but, in reality All he is, is actually a fake. This guy says he bets on all these games but their is never any proof. I can pay the fee also at SBR and become a "PRO". Being a pro doesn't mean you have to bet on every game, what it actually means is that you wager on two three good games a day and make money off that..what this guy does is called GREEDYNESS wants to become a millionaire with one shot.
Comment
funnyb25
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
07-09-09
39663
#22
Originally posted by 7777KaL
C'mon my boy, don't blow up his head even more now. Yes, he believes he is a professional but, in reality All he is, is actually a fake. This guy says he bets on all these games but their is never any proof. I can pay the fee also at SBR and become a "PRO". Being a pro doesn't mean you have to bet on every game, what it actually means is that you wager on two three good games a day and make money off that..what this guy does is called GREEDYNESS wants to become a millionaire with one shot.
So he sucks for betting on all these games but trying to be a millionaire in 1 shot? This might be the worst post of the month
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#23
Originally posted by 7777KaL
C'mon my boy, don't blow up his head even more now. Yes, he believes he is a professional but, in reality All he is, is actually a fake. This guy says he bets on all these games but their is never any proof. I can pay the fee also at SBR and become a "PRO". Being a pro doesn't mean you have to bet on every game, what it actually means is that you wager on two three good games a day and make money off that..what this guy does is called GREEDYNESS wants to become a millionaire with one shot.
Dead wrong, I bet 2.5% of Bankroll on 99% of the plays, hardly "greed" or a "get rich quick" scheme. If the plays are truly +EV, then high volume is good and it also leads to less variance. But it is still a grind, +30-unit weeks are an anomaly and not the rule.
Comment
RavensFan2k3
SBR Posting Legend
08-18-12
17378
#24
Hey LT, you don't think BlueJays avoid the sweep here?
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#25
Originally posted by funnyb25
So he sucks for betting on all these games but trying to be a millionaire in 1 shot? This might be the worst post of the month
Again, that is not the case at all, I bet every single day of my life so I cannot afford to bet a larger % of BR per play where a bad day would be more devastating.
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#26
Originally posted by RavensFan2k3
Hey LT, you don't think BlueJays avoid the sweep here?
Obviously not.
Comment
funnyb25
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
07-09-09
39663
#27
Originally posted by LT Profits
Again, that is not the case at all, I bet every single day of my life so I cannot afford to bet a larger % of BR per play where a bad day would be more devastating.
Lol, I was referring to 777kals post buddy...he makes no sense...read it again
Comment
RavensFan2k3
SBR Posting Legend
08-18-12
17378
#28
Originally posted by LT Profits
Obviously not.
Lmao!!! I guess what I meant was why not, silly question I guess LOL
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#29
Originally posted by juicername
What do you get for Giants/Padres if you don't mind me asking? Thanks.
San Francisco 58% (-138).
I am considering adding the Under as I get 5.6.
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#30
Originally posted by RavensFan2k3
Lmao!!! I guess what I meant was why not, silly question I guess LOL
Mainly because Odorizzi grades out much better than Dickey. Model has this game dead even at 50% both sides.
Comment
juicername
SBR Hall of Famer
10-14-15
6906
#31
Originally posted by LT Profits
San Francisco 58% (-138).
I am considering adding the Under as I get 5.6.
Thanks. Under, really? I would think that Pomeranz has overachieved big time so far but maybe he's a better pitcher than I give him credit for.
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#32
Originally posted by juicername
Thanks. Under, really? I would think that Pomeranz has overachieved big time so far but maybe he's a better pitcher than I give him credit for.
Overachieving yeah, but he is still very solid with a 2.63 FIP and 3.41 xFIP. I also think Pomeranz was underrated to begin the year and am not surprised to see him doing well now that he finally has a steady rotation spot. He still needs to cut down his walks though, but once he escaped from Colorado, he had a 3.77 FIP and 3.65 xFIP in 2014 and 3.62 FIP and 3.89 xFIP last year while with Oakland.
Comment
GreatWallofTrump
SBR Wise Guy
02-27-16
729
#33
San Diego is going to blow up the Giants. I say this because I am on the Giants. That's how it works.
Comment
kobi_j
SBR High Roller
10-02-13
161
#34
LT what are your thoughts on Balt/sea under? Both pitchers seems to be playing well
Comment
homerbush
SBR MVP
11-17-08
2317
#35
Originally posted by LT Profits
Overachieving yeah, but he is still very solid with a 2.63 FIP and 3.41 xFIP. I also think Pomeranz was underrated to begin the year and am not surprised to see him doing well now that he finally has a steady rotation spot. He still needs to cut down his walks though, but once he escaped from Colorado, he had a 3.77 FIP and 3.65 xFIP in 2014 and 3.62 FIP and 3.89 xFIP last year while with Oakland.
Pomeranz always had the talent and has looked great since leaving Colorado and really had some periods at Colorado weren't terrible but I am still on this over. Rare my capping differs this much from LT. Good luck though.