Brandon Lang 12/12

[UZI Suicide]

Patriots -6 1/2

[wahoo1]

Thanks UZI!

[hopeslayerdt]

amazes me how their crew goes against each other all the time, such a bs business ploy.. obv one of them is gonna win

[jtoler]

[tribeforlife22]

let me guess, you're making the picks for him again since he won 2/7?

[StackinGreen]

let me guess, you're making the picks for him again since he won 2/7?

Haha, just wait when I start the Bowl Season Fade thread ... we always get the last laugh.

[MrAllin]

anyone getting lang tonight?

[DISTROYA]

contribute to the buy group across the street=get daily plays=stop panhandling for them

[SEASNAGG]

i like it well said

[StackinGreen]

How do I contribute? I'll send them a goodwill gift (;

[hopeslayerdt]

yea id like to as well

[StackinGreen]

I think I'm going $8/dime this year on the Bowl and NFL fades.

For whatever reason I couldn't use a space bar on my PMs, so if anyone wants to look at last year's again, just use the search function. Or if too lazy to do that, here you go:

http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/service-plays/3194765-official-golden-goose-fade-thread-bowl-season-2015-16-a.html?highlight=Lang+Fade+Bowl+season

Check out the NFL fade right after that, too.You're welcome.

[DISTROYA]

people, all you have to do is go to the other site similar to this, they have a group that chips in (me included) and you have langs plays all the way until summer of 2017. Its kinda dickish to just get/ask for the plays, expect non-stop for free when the people who contribute and actually pay a fee to get them. If your serious about fading, especially bowl season which is unprecedentedly his worst "capping" then you go there join the group and thats that. You get the games emailed every day.
Im personally sick of the back-and-forth, the dippy-shit poster that loves lang and all the useless banter. I just want the plays, dime amounts, and not comb through sites and topics to see if I can get a free handout every day.
I also should say this. Since I joined the buy group (back at beginning of MLB playoffs), Lang hasnt made a single dollar of fade profit. He has actually gone 30-21, so 21-30 for the fade, and down 130 units fading if you factor in the juice.
I dont fade every day or even every week, Im really just waiting for the bowl games to go for broke. But its fun knowing what side he's on and what bullshit angle he's using (some of his analysis is just ridiculously stupid and simple)
To each their own this is just "my two cents" as the pube-hair would say.
Lang is not a terrible capper, he is a terrible unit-rater if you will. At 30-21, his faders should be down a LOT more but he blows it on the bigger unit-assigned games. I'm gonna lay $10/dime hopefully his bowl run will be as bad as before.

[MrAllin]

distroya if u already have people buying lang then post stop being selfish. Why would i buy picks u already have paid for? how bout instead i spend my money on other picks then share them with u so we get more picks. or you could just be a douche and have everyone on the entire forum spend money on lang picks.

[DISTROYA]

first of all I have no clue what your saying. The more people buy the group package, the less it will cost per person for the next one. And Im sick of freeloaders trying to get the plays for free and not contributing shit in return, while the group pays for the plays only to have someone leak them on different forums. "whats the play for lang today, whats the play, whats the fade" Why dont these people actually join the buy group instead of begging for plays because their asses are too cheap to pitch in. Your idea of buying someone elses picks makes sense/trading see you are someone that gives to receive I get it. Im simply talking about the people that just pop-in here, ask where the play wheres the play, and dont contribute shit in return. My intent isnt to get every poster to buy langs picks you misunderstood. Its the principle I am talking about giving something and receiving instead of just getting getting getting for those people.

[shantyman]

Lang the fraud

Distroya, I agree with you that Lang has no clue about money management, and is an absolute joke when it comes to big plays. However, your statistics are a bit off. If you had faded Lang on all his plays for the last seven or eight weeks as you had indicated you had, and bet the amounts that he suggested, you would be up money. He rarely has a winning week, and even when he gets lucky and does, it is usually a small amount. His losing weeks, which are the norm, results in his clients getting absolutely buried.

[DISTROYA]

besides steve stevens (ridiculously expensive) and ATS, there really isnt anyone i would want because I only fade bad handicappers. If anyone gets their plays I would gladly exchange langs.

[DISTROYA]

I can guarantee you your not up fading him the past 51 plays...thats as far as I go back. If you faded dime for dime, record is 21-30, down 130 units, assuming -110 juice. Just waiting for the bowl implosion

[shantyman]

You can't assume a -110 vig. He often buys additional 1/2 points particularly on his big plays.

[DISTROYA]

thats all nonsense to cover his ass. I highly doubt anyone fades and "sells" points as opposed to buying them for fade purposes. If the turd gives out a play @ +7 and says buy the half point to +7.5, does anyone actually sell 1/2 and take the -7.5 at +110, etc? I simply find the best line and record for fade tracking results. I would be happy to show each play with assigned unit value but I cant do it here its not allowed

[StackinGreen]

Yes, I wish I could get Stevens too, the ultimate turd of them all!

[clockwise1965]

I can guarantee you your not up fading him the past 51 plays...thats as far as I go back. If you faded dime for dime, record is 21-30, down 130 units, assuming -110 juice. Just waiting for the bowl implosion

It is much easier to find a really bad handicapper to fade then a good one to follow.

I dont know from personal experience about Lang but from what ive seen posted. He may be one of the better fades.

His videos are priceless.

[DISTROYA]

actually clockwise, you'd be surprised how hard it is to find a consistently bad capper to fade. Its like the reverse keno, its equally as hard NOT to pick winning numbers as it is to pick winners.
I should also point out Lang was terrible a full 6 weeks before I joined the buy group; I mean he couldnt win on a weekend to save his life. Unfortunately I was hesitant on most games and buy the time I joined to get daily plays without hassle hasnt been profitable---yet.
As usual kiss of death as soon as I join anything on this or any other forum for fade purposes.
Videos are pure comedy. I saw the movie 2 for the money; cant believe this idiot actually had that magical run early in his "capping" career.

[StackinGreen]

clock,

It is interesting. I'm pretty certain (don't have the data) that it is not a normal distribution. For those of you with less knowledge of statistics, the bell shaped curve would not be equal when taking the peak distribution as the center point. That is, the data, in my opinion would be skewed so that the largest N would occur and hover around 45, with most people at 40-50%. You would get far more 40% pickers than 60% pickers, levels which would be roughly the same in an equal distribution.

The reason this would be hard to study, though, would be that a lot of losing occurs because of changed lines and chasing. Basically, wagering at far different times.

Given all that, the reality is that Lang ends up losing MORE than expected because he assigns really bad amounts (frequently) to picks that at best hover between 30-45%.

[clockwise1965]

clock,

It is interesting. I'm pretty certain (don't have the data) that it is not a normal distribution. For those of you with less knowledge of statistics, the bell shaped curve would not be equal when taking the peak distribution as the center point. That is, the data, in my opinion would be skewed so that the largest N would occur and hover around 45, with most people at 40-50%. You would get far more 40% pickers than 60% pickers, levels which would be roughly the same in an equal distribution.

The reason this would be hard to study, though, would be that a lot of losing occurs because of changed lines and chasing. Basically, wagering at far different times.

Given all that, the reality is that Lang ends up losing MORE than expected because he assigns really bad amounts (frequently) to picks that at best hover between 30-45%.

Very good point.