why megyn kelly was in a bad mood tonight? trump's post on twitter
Collapse
X
-
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#106Comment -
packerd_00SBR Posting Legend
- 05-22-13
- 17804
-
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#109
because we both know what happened last time you tried to speak up. That is why you have been mia for many, many months in these discussions. Your ego couldn't take anymore embarrassment.
and I do know a lot about England's current affairs especially relating to economics, what would you like to know?Comment -
packerd_00SBR Posting Legend
- 05-22-13
- 17804
#110You seem to have a selective memory,last I remember telling you to keep your beak out of English politics because you haven't got any idea whats going on outside of your trailer park,didnt hear a peep from you after that.Comment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#111
If it helps ring a bell in that void of yours, by the rules of logic, you lost last time. No opinions, just logic; you lost.
but the important part is you're still dumb clearly. You're retarding yourself.Last edited by brooks85; 01-30-16, 02:46 PM.Comment -
packerd_00SBR Posting Legend
- 05-22-13
- 17804
#112Do I need to be specific,a number of weeks ago I called you out on the Donald Trump being banned from England article,and you as usual were flapping your gums acting like you had a clue. I called you out and you went silent.Comment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#113
lol you called me out then I missed it. We both know I have no reason to run from you based on our previous dealings where I crushed you which is why you stayed out of politics for many months.
what did you call me out on specifically?
nothing I said in that thread was untrue. All I did was call out the hypocrisy and stupidity of the English using their OWN actions as evidence.Comment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36915
#114again, I'll let you know if you ever approach a logical point. You did the exact opposite of what you wanted by bringing up the jobs lost during bankruptcy because the fact is he created far more. And there is absolutely no one in the business world that thinks Trump made a wrong move getting out of a dying city that clearly did not want to gamble.
lol "bush is the reason no one besides rich can file for bankruptcy." Completely false.[/QUOTE]
wrong again bush made where everyone has to pay certain percentage have to pay creditors back. so you wrong again. please use your computer before opening your deeksucker up.Comment -
packerd_00SBR Posting Legend
- 05-22-13
- 17804
-
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36915
#117How do I know this because room mate in college is bankruptcy lawyer. oh yeah you can pay 60 % on the dollar for your credit card bills. also I remember when he did thecredit card interest act and those assholes raised everyone interest rates . funny how a lot of you can't read how the dude from saudi arabia bail trump out 3 times so he didn't have in on his recordComment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#118brooks tell that to those employees of the casinos in new jersey. difference between you and I is i actually owned a company. When bush was in office; all the cleanouts and maintenance work of those fore closed homes was serviced by yours truly. i had southwest ohio and northern ky. My business partner still has it but by me being uninsurable for blood pressure and diabetes I had to leave and work for trans-american. If we would of had obama care then I would of never left. By the way Bush is the reason that no one besides rich can file for bankruptcy. Try going to the hospital and getting a 200,000 bill for a week stay.
again, I'll let you know if you ever approach a logical point. You did the exact opposite of what you wanted by bringing up the jobs lost during bankruptcy because the fact is he created far more. And there is absolutely no one in the business world that thinks Trump made a wrong move getting out of a dying city that clearly did not want to gamble.
lol "bush is the reason no one besides rich can file for bankruptcy." Completely false.
wrong again bush made where everyone has to pay certain percentage have to pay creditors back. so you wrong again. please use your computer before opening your deeksucker up.
Also "bush" did not make it that way. It was going to happen regardless, in 2004 1 in 74 households were going into bankruptcy. It was going to change no matter what. This is just like when you said the market didn't perform under bush. Chico, you clearly have no idea what you're talking about and the math proves it.Comment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
-
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36915
#120brooks my retort was to you saying bush didn't stop every day people from filing bankruptcy. Now you can file if you make 15,000 or less but i don't know anyone that makes that little or who would have credit!Comment -
packerd_00SBR Posting Legend
- 05-22-13
- 17804
-
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#122^thanks for proving my point pack. Logic gets me another victory. Again, everything said by me in that thread is 100% factual. Deal with it.
lolComment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36915
#123hell my out of pocket for my stoke was more that .Comment -
packerd_00SBR Posting Legend
- 05-22-13
- 17804
-
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
-
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36915
#126sounds like you can't do the math 11.8 increase in stock market under dem 1.9 under reps before 1998 so that is why you never came back to refute. one thing i'll say about you brooks is you never let the facts get in your way of your misinformation.Comment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#127
not trying to be a dick but you might want to go see if you remember it. You're wrong, emotional because you(or someone) you know was a fool with their portfolio as you described and you clearly don't know much about investing.Last edited by brooks85; 01-30-16, 03:16 PM.Comment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36915
#128wrong i said i was one of the few that made money under bush cause i moved my money to bonds. i guess u argue with so many people you can't get it straightComment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#129... that is not even what we're talking about... and truthfully moving your money to bonds when bush became president was not the most optimal move so I wouldn't go around patting yourself on the back. Even a broken clock is right twice a day. You left a lot of money on the table. You ended up being right for a reason that started before bush. You either can't deny this or don't know, your pick.Last edited by brooks85; 01-30-16, 03:23 PM.Comment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36915
#130well i do it ever rep. only reagan had the stock market right.Comment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36915
#131anyone with a brain will admit the usa does better with dem. pres and repub congressComment -
khicks26SBR Aristocracy
- 09-16-06
- 45596
#132The problem is that Brooks thinks his opinions are facts. His opinions are the "Holy of Holies"Comment -
chico2663BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-02-10
- 36915
-
khicks26SBR Aristocracy
- 09-16-06
- 45596
#134Sorry I forgot to mention the Holy Calculator GrailComment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#137
lol you're all over the place
I'll give ya 1000 points if you can prove one of them "opinions" wrong
I'm not worriedComment
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code