H2H Phil Mickelson -115 in Houston vs Patrick Reed.
Phil was on fire yesterday at -6, Reed -4.
Phil is trying to catch momentum into the Masters. Great start. Reed doesn't have
a history at Houston, and is a young player, so at -115 why not back the guy you
know is capable of brilliant golf ? Phil hasn't had a good 2015 until now, but it's
barely April so I see no reason to fade him when he's hot again.
The course isn't very long, there are some low scores coming up so if it's the
short game that matters, I'll take the 44-yr old lefty over the young hopeful.
The odds for Rd2 seem based more on the original to-win tournament odds.
But if Mickelson ate up the course at -6 yesterday, why fade him today ?
Phil was on fire yesterday at -6, Reed -4.
Phil is trying to catch momentum into the Masters. Great start. Reed doesn't have
a history at Houston, and is a young player, so at -115 why not back the guy you
know is capable of brilliant golf ? Phil hasn't had a good 2015 until now, but it's
barely April so I see no reason to fade him when he's hot again.
The course isn't very long, there are some low scores coming up so if it's the
short game that matters, I'll take the 44-yr old lefty over the young hopeful.
The odds for Rd2 seem based more on the original to-win tournament odds.
But if Mickelson ate up the course at -6 yesterday, why fade him today ?
