Pat McAfee Draws Backlash Over Bet Placed Ahead of LeBron James Announcement

Pat McAfee has been criticized after betting on LeBron James’ next team using information from NBA insider Shams Charania before the move was announced.
Pat McAfee on set as we look at his betting on LeBron's next team ahead of the announcement.
Pictured: Pat McAfee on set as we look at his betting on LeBron's next team ahead of the announcement. Photo by Kirby Lee-Imagn Images
Enjoying SBR content? Add us as a preferred source on your Google account Add as a preferred source on Google

ESPN personality Pat McAfee is under fire after admitting on his show that he placed a wager on LeBron James's next team using a tip from NBA insider Shams Charania before the news went public. James officially announced his move to the Philadelphia 76ers on a two-year deal worth $8 million, with a player option for the second season. 

According to McAfee, Charania told him earlier that day that he would want him on the program, which McAfee took as a signal that James had reached a decision, even though the destination itself was not revealed. McAfee then placed a bet on the top four contenders for James's services, recalling that Philadelphia's odds sat at +700 at the time he made the wager. 

"We were told by Shams, 'You're gonna want me on the show today,'" McAfee said. "So it's like, OK, decision's being made. I just hammered top four. He was at +700,” he said.  

Author and journalist Jeff Pearlman publicly condemned the situation, arguing that the exchange between McAfee and Charania showed a network that has prioritized profit over reporting standards. Pearlman pointed to recent layoffs at ESPN, contrasting them with the network's continued support for betting partnerships. 

He described the influence of gambling on sports coverage as damaging and said it undermines any claim that ESPN still functions primarily as a news organization. 

The episode has renewed scrutiny of the relationship between sports media figures and the betting industry, particularly when insider access to information intersects with personal wagers placed before news becomes public. 

Prediction markets also struggled

McAfee was not alone in misjudging how the James sweepstakes would unfold. Prediction market apps such as Kalshi and Polymarket saw hundreds of millions of dollars traded on where James would sign, and both platforms largely failed to anticipate Philadelphia as the outcome. 

On Kalshi, roughly $226 million had been wagered on James's next destination. Just before the announcement, the 76ers sat at only 9%, trailing the Cavaliers, Heat, and Warriors. Philadelphia's odds had remained below 10% for most of the period and did not begin climbing meaningfully until about 20 minutes before James actually signed. 

A brief spike to 77% appeared on Kalshi roughly 20 minutes before ESPN reported the news, but a company spokesperson said the platform's “smoothing algorithm” can make trading activity appear to have happened earlier or later than it actually did. Kalshi said the real spike occurred closer to the time the news broke. 

Polymarket's international platform showed similarly poor odds for Philadelphia, giving the 76ers just a 7.6% chance shortly before the announcement, with the Heat favored at 47.5%. For most of June and July, Philadelphia's odds on that platform sat below 1%. 

Industry observers noted that a lack of historical data on unpredictable free-agent decisions like James's makes it especially difficult for prediction markets to generate accurate forecasts in such situations.