What to do if you are restricted?

[LorenzoMadera]

Was restricted on fanduel, fanatics, draftking, espn and hardrock. How to deal with it? What do you do when you get restrictions? How reasonable is it to use other people's accounts in such cases?

[DwightShrute]

restricted how?

[LorenzoMadera]

They cut my maximum bet amount to impossibly small after checking the documents

[DwightShrute]

They cut my maximum bet amount to impossibly small after checking the documents

That's what I thought.

• Open an offshore account. Crypto makes it easy and fast. There several books that have a solid reputation.
• Move to Vegas

[LorenzoMadera]

[QUOTE=DwightShrute;31407406]Я так и думал.

• Откройте офшорный счет. Криптовалюта делает это легко и быстро. Есть несколько книг, которые имеют солидную репутацию.
• Переехать в Вегас

I already have offshore crypto accounts, stake and sportsbet they are just as restricted lol after two or three of my bets, usa bookies have lasted at least more than 10 bets, what other offshore crypto bookmakers do you recommend?

[raiders72001]

That's what I thought.

• Open an offshore account. Crypto makes it easy and fast. There several books that have a solid reputation.
• Move to Vegas

Bitcoin-Betting for a bitcoin book , anonymous and will not limit. Use VPN if in the US.

[Pragmatic]

[QUOTE=LorenzoMadera;n29093084]

Я так и думал.

• Откройте офшорный счет. Криптовалюта делает это легко и быстро. Есть несколько книг, которые имеют солидную репутацию.
• Переехать в Вегас

I already have offshore crypto accounts, stake and sportsbet they are just as restricted lol after two or three of my bets, usa bookies have lasted at least more than 10 bets, what other offshore crypto bookmakers do you recommend?

Restricted after 2 or 3 wagers. Maybe you need to reconsider your approach?

[Optional]

What do you think it might be that you are doing that has all these books so hot to limit you fast?

Follow a popular tipster or tout?

Only bet off market or slow moving odds?

Targeting obscure sports only?

Anything like that or something else you can think of?

[LorenzoMadera]

What do you think it might be that you are doing that has all these books so hot to limit you fast?

Follow a popular tipster or tout?

Only bet off market or slow moving odds?

Targeting obscure sports only?

Anything like that or something else you can think of?

If I choose one of your options, I would call it a slowly changing bookmaker line in live mode, using additional equipment I place bets on events that have already happened (goal, removal, card, next point and everything else), we are talking literally about seconds, if in short, these are bets like courtsiding, you can read on the Internet what it is.

[Optional]

If I choose one of your options, I would call it a slowly changing bookmaker line in live mode, using additional equipment I place bets on events that have already happened (goal, removal, card, next point and everything else), we are talking literally about seconds, if in short, these are bets like courtsiding, you can read on the Internet what it is.

I guess you are really not surprised that they collar you then?

I don't have an answer to getting around that. Even people who are simply betting within about 30 seconds of outcomes often get limited on most live platforms. And people won't normally share the name if they find a live operator who does not catch it.

[LorenzoMadera]

I guess you are really not surprised that they collar you then?

I don't have an answer to getting around that. Even people who are simply betting within about 30 seconds of outcomes often get limited on most live platforms. And people won't normally share the name if they find a live operator who does not catch it.

I have never understood why a player should be held responsible for the bookmaker’s mistakes and shortcomings and receive measures against him, if according to logic, the bookmaker should not have any loopholes that can be used against him, if they do, then this is your omission and not my violation.

[nbaguy23]

I have never understood why a player should be held responsible for the bookmaker’s mistakes and shortcomings and receive measures against him, if according to logic, the bookmaker should not have any loopholes that can be used against him, if they do, then this is your omission and not my violation.

Agreed,

To play devil's advocate-why should a bookmaker continue to accept your full $ wager action when they likely have tools as well in place that flags your activity. It sucks but it's the only industry where you get punished or faulted for being "too good" or having an edge. They are a for profit operation after all, especially if it's a big enough book they don't need to care about a collars customer satisfaction

[LorenzoMadera]

Agreed,

To play devil's advocate-why should a bookmaker continue to accept your full $ wager action when they likely have tools as well in place that flags your activity. It sucks but it's the only industry where you get punished or faulted for being "too good" or having an edge. They are a for profit operation after all, especially if it's a big enough book they don't need to care about a collars customer satisfaction

Yes, monopolists in the betting industry are more radical towards customers, but damn it, to get huge gross profits, services of top-class specialists, advanced technologies and to have such gaps in their system is strange, and to blame the client for their use and dishonesty is normal, it only shows that even big giants try to save on everything they can, writing off their savings on the dishonesty of the client.

[Pragmatic]

Totally confused here. Maybe we're missing something in translation?

OP admitted to past-posting, and then is like "How dare these monopolists catch on, and prevent my ability to past-post! We have truly achieved late-stage capitalism!"

Huh?

[darthvader777]

You could play at Bet105 or Pinnacle. Both have a solid reputation for not limiting or booting winning players.

[LorenzoMadera]

You could play at Bet105 or Pinnacle. Both have a solid reputation for not limiting or booting winning players.

bet105 clone 1xbet is a red flag, doesn't bode well, pinnacle has poor match listings

[Optional]

Totally confused here. Maybe we're missing something in translation?

OP admitted to past-posting, and then is like "How dare these monopolists catch on, and prevent my ability to past-post!"

Huh?

He didn't admit to past posting. Just having access to a fast feed or radio broadcast. Or maybe he is talking about 'courtsiding', having someone at the match.

He is unhappy that merely being more efficient than the platform is being penalized.


Fair enough point, but logically if the platform can't handle it and would just bleed money and go broke, there would be no live platform. It's just one of those things that is what it is I think.

[Pragmatic]

He didn't admit to past posting. Just having access to a fast feed or radio broadcast. Or maybe he is talking about 'courtsiding', having someone at the match.

Again, maybe a translation issue. But placing bets on events that have already happened (goals, points). That wouldn't be considered past-posting?

We're not talking about somebody who gets +200 pregame, when other books have +180. We're talking about live soccer/hockey games, when a book hasn't adjusted for a goal.

[Optional]

Again, maybe a translation issue. But placing bets on events that have already happened (goals, points). That wouldn't be considered past-posting?

We're not talking about somebody who gets +200 pregame, when other books have +180. We're talking about live soccer/hockey games, when a book hasn't adjusted for a goal.

You are correct. He did say he was past posting. My error. For some reason I read it to say he was betting seconds before.

[BearBuckMtn]

'pinnacle has poor match listings' ... umm their listings are amazing you mean their prices are harder to beat when betting live low latency strategies?