Why asian brokerages but no US brokerages

[jgarz2]

Overseas, punters have an array of more options such as Eastbridge, Asianconnect Mollybet etc that give them access to liquidity outfits they usually wouldn't have exposure too, or keep moving money around book to book more efficient(costs) while maintaining limits.


What I've realized is, they lack books that take the risk of US-facing sports, let alone don't use Betcris. With Betcris, BOL, Grande and some other botique facing sites that have a risk tolerance for educated action in US sports, why do you think there is non readily available? Would you use a service that did soley US

[MeanPeopleSuck]

Overseas, punters have an array of more options such as Eastbridge, Asianconnect Mollybet etc that give them access to liquidity outfits they usually wouldn't have exposure too, or keep moving money around book to book more efficient(costs) while maintaining limits.


What I've realized is, they lack books that take the risk of US-facing sports, let alone don't use Betcris. With Betcris, BOL, Grande and some other botique facing sites that have a risk tolerance for educated action in US sports, why do you think there is non readily available? Would you use a service that did soley US

Even well regarded bet brokers involve some risks, so I don't think using them is anybody's first choice.

Asian brokers are popular because they allow US based gamblers access to white label versions of some European books that ban Americans, but most US facing books don't ban anybody so why take the risk of using a broker instead of just opening an account?