Mueller complained that Barr’s letter did not capture ‘context’ of Trump probe

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • L8night
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 05-04-13
    • 5535

    #141
    Originally posted by RoyBacon
    She reminds me of Weekend at Bernie's

    Dems are trying to get ahead of the dbl IG reports. Even the NY Times has an article on the illegal spying on Trump. Front page no less. This distraction will be swept away with real Watergate hearings in a couple of months.
    Just imagine if she wasn't in her position, I believe they would have tar and feathers ready for Donnie and his administration.

    I see the NY Times article is out, I plan on reading it later today, I will be reading the IG reports that you point out when they are made public, if wrong doing was done let justice prevail...
    Comment
    • ByeShea
      SBR Hall of Famer
      • 06-30-08
      • 8158

      #142
      Originally posted by L8night
      So true, but we have to wait for the concrete, not get away with it proof, the optics are not good for Donnie and co., I see that Sen. Blumenthal's emoluments law suit against Donnie just cleared its 2nd hurdle.
      What happened to Taco Man? Who wrote this?
      Comment
      • L8night
        SBR Hall of Famer
        • 05-04-13
        • 5535

        #143
        Originally posted by ByeShea
        What happened to Taco Man? Who wrote this?
        Sorry I don't know who Taco Man is?kind of hard to keep up with who has a nickname these days.



        It looks like they can now get financial data from the Trump Organization...
        Comment
        • ByeShea
          SBR Hall of Famer
          • 06-30-08
          • 8158

          #144
          Originally posted by L8night
          Sorry I don't know who Taco Man is?kind of hard to keep up with who has a nickname these days.
          Oh, it shouldn't be too hard to figure out.
          Comment
          • DwightShrute
            SBR Aristocracy
            • 01-17-09
            • 103806

            #145
            Comment
            • L8night
              SBR Hall of Famer
              • 05-04-13
              • 5535

              #146
              Originally posted by ByeShea
              Oh, it shouldn't be too hard to figure out.
              LOL, got it, I use that emojie to remind myself and everyone that Mexico is paying for the wall, I was a little busy this morning and I forgot to sign off the reply with it...
              Comment
              • JohnGalt2341
                SBR Hall of Famer
                • 12-31-09
                • 9138

                #147
                Originally posted by RoyBacon
                There are no sealed charges either but good try.

                Yes, love chess.
                REALLY? Have you ever played in a tournament? If yes... did you have a rating? If so... what was/is it?
                Comment
                • RoyBacon
                  BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                  • 09-21-05
                  • 37074

                  #148
                  Originally posted by JohnGalt2341
                  REALLY? Have you ever played in a tournament? If yes... did you have a rating? If so... what was/is it?
                  I was a consistent 1500-1550 guy but didn't play for 15-20 years and have just been back at it sparsely for a couple of years. I would guess I'm a legit 1400+ guy. Need to practice. Not seeing the board the way I need to.

                  I did play last week against my 1900 relative and split 2 games.

                  How about you?
                  Comment
                  • JohnGalt2341
                    SBR Hall of Famer
                    • 12-31-09
                    • 9138

                    #149
                    Originally posted by RoyBacon
                    I was a consistent 1500-1550 guy but didn't play for 15-20 years and have just been back at it sparsely for a couple of years. I would guess I'm a legit 1400+ guy. Need to practice. Not seeing the board the way I need to.

                    I did play last week against my 1900 relative and split 2 games.

                    How about you?
                    I appreciate your honesty. I played in a few live tournaments when I was in my early 20's. I never had an official rating because I didn't have enough games. But I believe my provisional rating was around 1900. I thought I was pretty good at the time but the REALLY good players would stomp me. I remember one tournament specifically where I won my first 3 games and then I ended up playing the current high school state champion. He was rated in the 2400's. He beat me pretty easily and he was easily the best player I had ever played. I haven't played much in the last 15 years or so... only a few games. My game of choice these days is Othello/Hexversi and all it's variations.
                    Comment
                    • RoyBacon
                      BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                      • 09-21-05
                      • 37074

                      #150
                      Originally posted by JohnGalt2341
                      I appreciate your honesty. I played in a few live tournaments when I was in my early 20's. I never had an official rating because I didn't have enough games. But I believe my provisional rating was around 1900. I thought I was pretty good at the time but the REALLY good players would stomp me. I remember one tournament specifically where I won my first 3 games and then I ended up playing the current high school state champion. He was rated in the 2400's. He beat me pretty easily and he was easily the best player I had ever played. I haven't played much in the last 15 years or so... only a few games. My game of choice these days is Othello/Hexversi and all it's variations.
                      Ratings can be a funny thing. If you play online you find out those eastern euro guys are like playing Chessmaster3000(and occasionally you are). I did some online tourneys but never liked fighting the clock. You could be up a rook and 3 pawns and eventually lose on the hour limit.

                      1900 is pretty lofty. I'll need a good line if we play.
                      Comment
                      • DwightShrute
                        SBR Aristocracy
                        • 01-17-09
                        • 103806

                        #151
                        <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">My &#39;Indicted by Summer&#39; Wish List:<br><br>1. Obama<br>2. The Clintons<br>3. Comey<br>4. Strozk<br>5. Lisa Page<br>6. McCabe<br>7. Clapper<br>8. Brennan<br>9. Rice<br>10. Yates<br><br>Is this too much to ask for?</p>&mdash; Julio Gonzalez (@TaxReformExpert) <a href="https://twitter.com/TaxReformExpert/status/1123980091602677760?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >May 2, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
                        Comment
                        • L8night
                          SBR Hall of Famer
                          • 05-04-13
                          • 5535

                          #152
                          Comment
                          • DwightShrute
                            SBR Aristocracy
                            • 01-17-09
                            • 103806

                            #153
                            Comment
                            • DwightShrute
                              SBR Aristocracy
                              • 01-17-09
                              • 103806

                              #154
                              Comment
                              • d2bets
                                BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                • 08-10-05
                                • 39995

                                #155
                                Originally posted by DwightShrute
                                The Mueller Report doesn't say there was no collusion. That's the Barr Report.
                                Comment
                                • DwightShrute
                                  SBR Aristocracy
                                  • 01-17-09
                                  • 103806

                                  #156
                                  Originally posted by d2bets
                                  The Mueller Report doesn't say there was no collusion. That's the Barr Report.
                                  yes it does actually. It specifically says there was no collusion.

                                  “The Special Counsel’s investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election,” Barr wrote in his letter to Congress, summarizing the principal conclusions of the first part of Mueller’s report
                                  Comment
                                  • RoyBacon
                                    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                    • 09-21-05
                                    • 37074

                                    #157
                                    Originally posted by d2bets
                                    The Mueller Report doesn't say there was no collusion. That's the Barr Report.
                                    LOL

                                    He either charges or he doesn't, remember Hillary? You are not a little bit pregnant. You didn't cover this in law school?
                                    Comment
                                    • d2bets
                                      BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                      • 08-10-05
                                      • 39995

                                      #158
                                      Originally posted by DwightShrute
                                      yes it does actually. It specifically says there was no collusion.

                                      “The Special Counsel’s investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election,” Barr wrote in his letter to Congress, summarizing the principal conclusions of the first part of Mueller’s report
                                      A. Please highlight the word 'collusion'.
                                      B. Why are you quoting Barr's letter when we have the Mueller Report itself?
                                      Comment
                                      • DwightShrute
                                        SBR Aristocracy
                                        • 01-17-09
                                        • 103806

                                        #159
                                        Originally posted by d2bets
                                        A. Please highlight the word 'collusion'.
                                        B. Why are you quoting Barr's letter when we have the Mueller Report itself?
                                        Comment
                                        • L8night
                                          SBR Hall of Famer
                                          • 05-04-13
                                          • 5535

                                          #160
                                          Don McGahn is supposed to turn over documents tomorrow and is ordered to testify May 21...
                                          Comment
                                          • RoyBacon
                                            BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                            • 09-21-05
                                            • 37074

                                            #161
                                            Originally posted by L8night
                                            Don McGahn is supposed to turn over documents tomorrow and is ordered to testify May 21...
                                            ~yawn~ See ya in the SCOTUS in a couple of year...
                                            Comment
                                            • L8night
                                              SBR Hall of Famer
                                              • 05-04-13
                                              • 5535

                                              #162
                                              Originally posted by RoyBacon
                                              ~yawn~ See ya in the SCOTUS in a couple of year...
                                              Great response Roy, more obstruction?, the law doesn't look like it is on Donnie's side no matter what Barr says...
                                              Comment
                                              Search
                                              Collapse
                                              SBR Contests
                                              Collapse
                                              Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                              Collapse
                                              Working...