Really wish I'd taken W&M at +19 last night. George Mason is coming off an emotional road win at C of C and I think that's a lot of points to lay for an afternoon game. Not interested at 17, though.
Comment
hydrosmak
SBR MVP
10-13-11
1908
#321
Whole lot of red on my screen for a second there. 5Dimes, Pinny, Matchbook and Greek all went to +6.5 for Penn State.
Comment
DegenerateGmblr
SBR Rookie
12-28-11
15
#322
Florida is -3 +115 now. Still good? I really like the under for the Winter Classic its 5.5
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#323
MSU/Georgia under 49 (Bovada) (2U)
Comment
CanuckG
SBR Posting Legend
12-23-10
21978
#324
Originally posted by CanuckG
January 2nd, 2011:
Florida -2 (-110) (1U)
Looking at 3-4 other plays
Winner. Going to stop for today and enjoy the games.
CanuckG's YTD: 7-5 +1.8U
Comment
mikea33
SBR MVP
11-14-11
2149
#325
Canuck any leans for tonight?
No coin fortunetly i had opposite your picks today. Well, whatever i'll be down in a couple days anyways. happy new year
Comment
CanuckG
SBR Posting Legend
12-23-10
21978
#326
Ehh not really. Almost took the T-Wolves tonight but I'm going to pass.
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#327
I would say WTF on the MSU/Georgia under losing, but what's the point? Par for the course. I can mush any total, anytime, anywhere. Two Top-10 defenses nationally and all I needed was a 2H under 33.
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#328
Wofford +5 (1U) Hofstra +7 (1U) LSU +2.5 (1U)
Comment
CanuckG
SBR Posting Legend
12-23-10
21978
#329
Sharks/Canucks Under 5.5 (-115) (1U)
Was going to take the Sharks straight up but more comfortable with this play.
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#330
I would recommend the Stanford/Okie State under. However, I'm done with totals for a while. These defenses are both better than you'd assume if you just looked at surface statics. I expect about 65-68 points to be scored here.
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#331
Originally posted by No coincidences
I would recommend the Stanford/Okie State under. However, I'm done with totals for a while. These defenses are both better than you'd assume if you just looked at surface stats. I expect about 65-68 points to be scored here.
S"tat"s.
Comment
t-wizzle
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
12-18-09
38099
#332
Originally posted by No coincidences
I would recommend the Stanford/Okie State under. However, I'm done with totals for a while. These defenses are both better than you'd assume if you just looked at surface statics. I expect about 65-68 points to be scored here.
Bro you literally always say that you're done betting totals and then you go and bet an Under on your next play.
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#333
Originally posted by t-wizzle
Bro you literally always say that you're done betting totals and then you go and bet an Under on your next play.
I know.
It's uncanny -- and ridiculous how often this kind of bizarre shit happens.
Comment
t-wizzle
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
12-18-09
38099
#334
Originally posted by No coincidences
I know.
It's uncanny -- and ridiculous how often this kind of bizarre shit happens.
But is it bizarre if it continually happens over and over again? I mean really let's be honest, when it comes to totals you generally bet Unders. The ends of games typically see some weird things happen because the time is condensed and points are needed more than ever.
All I'm saying is that if you really think it's bizarre shit and it keeps happening, why continue to bet totals?
Comment
PAULYPOKER
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
12-06-08
36581
#335
Watch this fukkin shit,, soon as I give up on the dogs,Stanford will win even with Lang on them..................
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#336
Adding 5U to the Bucks at +5 (Bovada).
If this doesn't hit, I might have to wave the white flag on this thread. It's just been one disaster after another for me.
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#337
Originally posted by t-wizzle
But is it bizarre if it continually happens over and over again? I mean really let's be honest, when it comes to totals you generally bet Unders. The ends of games typically see some weird things happen because the time is condensed and points are needed more than ever.
All I'm saying is that if you really think it's bizarre shit and it keeps happening, why continue to bet totals?
Originally posted by No coincidences
I would recommend the Stanford/Okie State under. However, I'm done with totals for a while. These defenses are both better than you'd assume if you just looked at surface statics. I expect about 65-68 points to be scored here.
This game will be my testing sample t-wizz.
I pass on under winners all the time. Yet the ones I play will be 16-0 at half between two Top-10 defenses and still go over 49.
As long as I keep passing on under winners and betting under losers, then yes, it's bizarre to me. I bet totals because I (used to) kill them in football and because when I see an angle point-wise, I take it.
Comment
CanuckG
SBR Posting Legend
12-23-10
21978
#338
2H Spurs/T-Wolves Under 97 (-104) (1U)
Comment
CanuckG
SBR Posting Legend
12-23-10
21978
#339
Good Luck No Coin.
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#340
Originally posted by No coincidences
Wisconsin +6 (4U)
Lost by 1.
Originally posted by No coincidences
MSU/Georgia under 49 (Bovada) (2U)
Lost after a 16-point 1H.
Originally posted by No coincidences
LSU +2.5 (1U)
LSU down 1 with the ball and 18 seconds left. Didn't cover.
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#341
Originally posted by CanuckG
Good Luck No Coin.
Thanks Canuck. You too. I'm just wasting my time in this thread; you need to hold down the fort.
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#342
Originally posted by PAULYPOKER
Watch this fukkin shit,, soon as I give up on the dogs,Stanford will win even with Lang on them..................
What can you say: it's been a season for the favorite in college football. Guess that is just going to continue all the way through; it's been that way since day 1.
Comment
Ace_of_Spades
SBR Posting Legend
10-14-09
13518
#343
Some pretty bad beats.
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#344
Originally posted by Ace_of_Spades
Some pretty bad beats.
I've had my share of bad calls too -- don't get me wrong.
I just don't need the bullshit losses on top of that.
I keep beating the closer, and it's not helping one bit.
Comment
Ace_of_Spades
SBR Posting Legend
10-14-09
13518
#345
Maybe you should just concentrate on NBA and leave the College stuff.
Comment
Pauulzcappin
SBR Posting Legend
04-23-10
20295
#346
Originally posted by No coincidences
Adding 5U to the Bucks at +5 (Bovada). If this doesn't hit, I might have to wave the white flag on this thread. It's just been one disaster after another for me.
It'll possibly hit. I have 750 riding on the NUggets.
Comment
thetrinity
SBR Posting Legend
01-25-11
22430
#347
been a messy week for me as well, just gotta try and hang in there i guess. i try and limit the units when im cold.
Comment
CanuckG
SBR Posting Legend
12-23-10
21978
#348
Originally posted by CanuckG
Sharks/Canucks Under 5.5 (-115) (1U)
Was going to take the Sharks straight up but more comfortable with this play.
Winner.
Originally posted by CanuckG
2H Spurs/T-Wolves Under 97 (-104) (1U)
Winner.
CanuckG's YTD: 9-5 +3.8U
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#349
Football games just don't go under anymore.
Every bowl game should have an O/U of 90 next year.
Comment
paco
SBR Aristocracy
05-07-09
62873
#350
Originally posted by No coincidences
Football games just don't go under anymore.
Every bowl game should have an O/U of 90 next year.
today
Florida under
SCarolina under
Houston under
I'm on under 75 this game and looked good after 7-0 in the 1st qtr.