Bad news guys: AK is on vacation for a week.

**magnavox** · 01-14-06, 10:23 AM

Originally posted by SBR_John

If he is to be allowed to post you will need to watch every word and move/edit them.

We'll se how committed to work your mods are.

**Razz** · 01-14-06, 10:26 AM

So, what's the bad news?

**HAPPY BOY** · 01-14-06, 03:50 PM

I cant quite figure AK he seems like a Solid guy.

**Winston Smith** · 01-14-06, 03:56 PM

Can you ban the word 'solid' with him?

**mad** · 01-14-06, 03:58 PM

Originally posted by Razz

So, what's the bad news?

LMAO, he'll be back i'm sure. Where would we be without the drama?

**onlooker** · 01-14-06, 06:07 PM

Originally posted by SBR_John

I gave him a one week posting vacation because he is using the SBRForum for his own business purposes some of which seem a bit shady.

Did he not agree to stop this , thats why you lifted his first ban?

**bigboydan** · 01-14-06, 06:14 PM

Originally posted by SBR_John

Maybe the mods can decide what they would like to do with ole AK. In fact, that's a good idea. Mods, decide what to do with AK before the 7 day ban is up. Whatever you decide go ahead, a further approval is not necessary. If he is to be allowed to post you will need to watch every word and move/edit them.

john, us mods will have to take a vote on it, if and when it comes down to that after the 7 days are up.

**tacomax** · 01-14-06, 06:17 PM

Originally posted by Winston Smith

Can you ban the word 'solid' with him?

Or - better still - can SBR tweak the software so that every mention of "solid" is replaced by "shit"?

Then his posts would make perfect sense.

Originally posted by AK

I'm AK and I'm shit

Originally posted by AK

I only promote shit books

**BAUS** · 01-14-06, 06:28 PM

Lol, Taco. Sharp post.

BAUS

**slacker00** · 01-14-06, 08:04 PM

Good post Taco, you're starting to become pretty sharp, I thought you were just solid. lol

**SBR_John** · 01-14-06, 08:23 PM

Very shit posts!!! opps, I mean solid.

These guys that own other micro small websites and are here solely to further their business should be controlled. I my self was in their shoes once upon a time so I know the game too.

I know most of us are amused by the two. But new folks could end up at one of their scams and probably already have and thats a pretty bad thing to allow.

**Mudcat** · 01-14-06, 09:54 PM

Originally posted by SBR_John

Maybe the mods can decide what they would like to do with ole AK.

Can former mods vote? Here's mine:

Or if you let him stay, you should implement a new rule that when someone gets below -200 reputation points, Tacomax gets full control of his avatar/signature etc.

:thumbs_up

**bigboydan** · 01-14-06, 11:35 PM

i did see AK make a earlier today, saying he didn't care if it was a permeanet banning. so with that being said, i guess it makes our jobs as mods easier in regards to having to make a decesion on this matter after his 7 day banning period is up.

i hate to ban anyone, but he just did ask for it in that post.

below is the quote where he did ask

~AK~
Registered Member

Date Joined Dec 2005
Total Posts : 26
Posted Today 8:34 PM (GMT -5)
John that week ban you just did on me go ahead and delete my entire account for life.

**SBR_John** · 01-15-06, 01:11 AM

Well not much in life is "forever". But overall I think we have to protect new members from guys who are to here solely to take their money .

**pags11** · 01-15-06, 04:23 AM

hope he enjoys his "solid" vacation...more time for him with is chicks...

**isetcap** · 01-15-06, 12:40 PM

AK rarely posts anything of value.

I would rather see the return of Raiders who at least was informative and started some great action.