The Raven are stupid to go for 2 for the win,technically it is not get the win and only take the lead regardless what happen next consequences.I understand why people hate this ,because we want keep the game long as possible to go to ot, as long as out wager take longer possible no matter what happen.But the problem here is if we don’t really gamble only watch the game,are we really want go for 2? I will said yes, this is more sudden death and more exciting moments, from old perspective,I don’t really go for 2, if the game no overtime and regular could end up tie,are raven still go for 2?I will doubt they will do it,you win it or lose it or tie up half win,I don’t like the tie,but sometime you have to take it, not go for 2 all the time and lose the game
-
-
Never been to a 2point convention. Where's the next one taking place?Comment -
Jimmy figured he could not win in OT but they moved the ball all gameComment -
Baltimore had Green Bay by the short hairs but they made a couple of mistakes that really matter:
1. They scored the TD 1 play too soon. I know you have to take what to can get when you can get it so its hard to fault them for leaving over half a minute on the clock when scoring a TD.
2. They threw the ball to the outside for a 2 point conversion right after powering their way with the running game up the middle. They should have manned up and run the ball again right down the middle. That play ran well all game.
Why leave winning or losing to a coin flip? Does anyone think that Rodgers wasn't going to be able to march right on down for a TD in overtime? They had the right idea but outsmarted themselves with the play calling.Comment -
They went for 2 to end the gm on 1 and kill packers bets. Gm opened 2 all the money was on pack. Cmon you guys need to get it together that you cant see the reason why they needed it to be a 1 pt win. Nobody covered on gb pub got fukkin buried. Gb didnt cover, arz lost to det and brady got shutout. Damn the books are having a happy holiday.Comment
