Man City -110 Champions League final

[wikkidinsane]

Lets not complicate it. If Chelsea Manage to get an open chance on goal, chances are it will be deemed off-sides becaude Little Werner cant stay onside for shit. Kante will face an uphill battle against that city midfield .

Mancity-2
Chelsea-0

[Sato]

you cursed it now. chelsea will win

[TheMetsSuck]

Didn’t go as planned the past two games vs Chelsea. I was on man city both of those and likely will again tomorrow. No way will this be an easy win for city though

[wikkidinsane]

Didn’t go as planned the past two games vs Chelsea. I was on man city both of those and likely will again tomorrow. No way will this be an easy win for city though

did you see the b side man city put out vs them? aguero was playing in 1 of those games if not both lol. It wasnt their a side

[wikkidinsane]

you cursed it now. chelsea will win

i wish i had that much power. good luck on your Chelsea bet. Not!

[RudyRuetigger]

good luck chief


i am broke offshore so cannot tail

[lakerboy]

Chelsea all day.

[Darkside Magick]

The only play is the DRAW

[lakerboy]

The only play is the DRAW

That's most likely result.

[pavyracer]

Five Underdogs in Champions League history to win the title

Chelsea (2012)

Liverpool (2005)

FC Porto (2004)

Nottingham Forrest (1978/79 and 1979/80)

[Four33]

Pep likes to overthink these type of games . City is the better side but wouldn’t be surprised if pep screws it up.

[Darkside Magick]

Five Underdogs in Champions League history to win the title


Chelsea (2012)

Liverpool (2005)

FC Porto (2004)


Nottingham Forrest (1978/79 and 1979/80)

Not a fan of stats and trends but this a telling stat/trend

[lakerboy]

Five Underdogs in Champions League history to win the title

Chelsea (2012)

Liverpool (2005)

FC Porto (2004)

Nottingham Forrest (1978/79 and 1979/80)

No chance this is correct.

Aston Villa was definitely an underdog vs Munich in 1982.
Bucharesti over Barcelona in 1986.
Dortmund over Juventus 3-1 in 1997.
Porto 2-1 over Munich 1987.

[pavyracer]

No chance this is correct.

Aston Villa was definitely an underdog vs Munich in 1982.
Bucharesti over Barcelona in 1986.
Dortmund over Juventus 3-1 in 1997.
Porto 2-1 over Munich 1987.

I don't know about before 1998.

I found all odds up to 1998/1999 here:

https://www.oddsportal.com/soccer/europe/champions-league/results/

It's very rare for an underdog to win in 90 minutes. Even Liverpool in 2005 and Chelsea in 2012 it was a draw. And Porto in 2004 was not the underdog.

So if you like Chelsea bet more on the draw.

[Darkside Magick]

The only play is the DRAW

Sometime it's so simple

Manchester City +101 vs Chelsea

[RudyRuetigger]

No chance this is correct.

Aston Villa was definitely an underdog vs Munich in 1982.
Bucharesti over Barcelona in 1986.
Dortmund over Juventus 3-1 in 1997.
Porto 2-1 over Munich 1987.

come on bro


you didnt know this



you looked it up to prove pavy wrong at his own sport




I RESPECT THAT

[lakerboy]

come on bro


you didnt know this



you looked it up to prove pavy wrong at his own sport




I RESPECT THAT

Of course. I can't let misinformation slide. Aston villa I definitely knew though.

[Mackballs]

Chelsea +.5 -105

[SamsNCharge99]

on chelsea

[super mario 48]

I think Chelsea team speed is always underrate.

1-1 most likely score imho

[wikkidinsane]

hit live ml +450 city

also over 2,2.5

the later being the bigger bet

[slayer14]

City only 1 shot on target in 96 mins tells the story

[wikkidinsane]

Congrats Chelsea backers ****#$%^@#%@&

Sato was right

[jjgold]

Wiki You got hurt bad today gambling let’s come back tomorrow

[wikkidinsane]

Wiki You got hurt bad today gambling let’s come back tomorrow

yeh 0-3 socxer but 2-0 nba

[RudyRuetigger]

atleast you are in the game unlike some fukkin idiots around here











[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ME]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]

[Optional]

They rigged it on you Wikkid