Even with bonuses very difficult to win any serious money with sportsbooks.....unless

[RudyRuetigger]

This guy related to wikkidinsane or vitterd?

[jjgold]

A massive downside is IRS on APPS if that is true

If you win say 5k on an app for the year you have to add that as income???????

If that is true I will always just take small promos and stick too offshore for bigger bets

Live Betting USA much better platform wise, menu wise, lines ok too

[winkyyy]

Even with bonuses very difficult to win any serious money with sportsbooks.....unless

you are wagering huge amounts...


sure...if u want to risk $10k 20k 30k u may win


but the avg $50 $100 $200 player not gonna be on EZ street..


The 100% Bonuses are just a Pie in the sky...


Simple math shows that if you play $100 10x @ -110 u are out the juice


$100 after 10 wagers....


and they are asking you to roll over 10x ?????



FUGGGEDABOUDITTT

[KVB]

...Simple math shows that if you play $100 10x @ -110 u are out the juice..

Not sure what that even means winkyyy.

Winning bets get charged the juice and I'm not so sure that's your biggest enemy in sportsbetting.

Good Luck!

Ok losing bettors, I could say you have a couple of advantages over us winners. Besides being able to learn from your mistakes (it’s the best way to learn), you are doing something every winner accepts as a part of life, losing some bets. I think it was Fran Tarkenton who said “winning was being unafraid to lose.”

But here’s one you may not have thought of: losing bettors pay less commissions than the winners.

If two bettors bet each other $110 on a game, the winner walks away with all $220: a free bet for everyone. If the players take their action to a bookmaker, at -110 pricing, the $220 they put in only returns $210 to the winner ($100 plus his original $110). The bookmaker withholds $10, or 4.55% of the total handle from the winner’s pay. The winner paid the vigorish, the loser played for free.

But the winner, who would have been paid $110 without the bookmaker’s service, was only paid $100. He paid about 9.09% commission.

Now, out of 100 bets, if you won 0 of them, you would pay no commission whatsoever. Likewise, if you were to win all 100 of those bets at -110 pricing, you would be paying some 9.09%. If the -110 point spread bet is a 50-50 proposition, then the average 50-50 better would pay about 4.55% of his total action (that’s over 9% on the winners and nothing on the losers).

So, at -110, if you win 45% of your bets, you paid about 4.09% commission, while the grinder who hit 55% of his bets ends up paying 5.00%.

Be thankful for -105 and such pricing.

For the forum, if the point spread is a 50-50 proposition, and each individual play has a price of -110, then, as percentage to two decimals, how much vigorish is the bookie keeping on a two pick parley that pays +260. Why do you think shops these days offer +265?

<iframe src='https://gfycat.com/ifr/GiganticEnergeticArmednylonshrimp' frameborder='0' scrolling='no' allowfullscreen width='640' height='1306'></iframe>

[pologq]

goddamn i want to do bad things to mia khalifa

winky, do you work for Gambler's Anonymous? i have never seen someone complain about sports betting so much when on a sports gambling forum?

[jjgold]

Winky your a dumb fuk

I made $1500 last month bonuses

Almost done with rolls playing safe

[Orbison]

goddamn i want to do bad things to mia khalifa

winky, do you work for Gambler's Anonymous? i have never seen someone complain about sports betting so much when on a sports gambling forum?

seems like him and Abe post the exact same threads, it's getting tiring

[5918mike]

Winky your a dumb fuk

100%

[pologq]

seems like him and Abe post the exact same threads, it's getting tiring

and to knock sports betting on a sports betting forum is insanity