Lol
OK
lol
OK
lol
-
-
Love the post fight interview.
Comment -
Lol
RiggedComment -
Tyson was -3350 on draft kings after round 6 to a draw Oh boy. Vegas didn't get enough Jones moneyComment -
You guys betting on grumpy old men when UFC is on and dogs are CRUSHINGComment -
This result was decided ahead of time.Comment -
Tyson be like "We humanitarians now"
Biggie knows.
Comment -
Yeah good times. Smith is a beastComment -
Draw was +800 pre fight at Draft Kings.Comment -
no official winner correct? it was always going to be a draw it was a ploy just like that golf matchComment -
I believe draftkings was the only US book with this fight. They sponsored the fight, and they voided everyones bets. On twitter people are posting voided draw bets. This was a total scam to get peoples money into their book.Comment -
I can't wait to pay for the rematch...Comment -
My bets have been voided too. I had over 6,5 rounds and a draw, both tickets voided. explanation was that there was no referees at the match and the points were not counted, and it was a technical draw. Although I have placed the bets not at draftkings.Comment -
Is there some official provider of the information? like the scores of judges etc? they claim there was no points counted at all. So maybe if I show them some official results they will pay.Comment -
This is what the sanctioning body said days before the fight
“Let’s call it an exhibition. That’s what it is. I want the public to know what this is because I don’t want people to be disappointed. As long as they know this is an exhibition, I’m fine for everybody to earn. … There’s no official judges. The WBC is going to have some guest celebrity judges remotely, not official, not 10-9 [scores], nothing like that.
“No cumulative score. No winner announced. That’s a very entertainment centered thing. It’s about entertainment. It’s not about competition. … It is what it is and it’s not more than it is but it’s going to be fun,” Andy Foster of the CSAC had said in a statement..Comment -
If I read and understand this correctly (English is not my native language) than bookmaker is correct. Although I wish they were not
However, this not explains why the over 6,5 was voided.
Comment -
They may be "right" about what they said about scoring. But they should have known that was how it was being done before offering the bets. It's not a good excuse to use afterward.
Especially for Over 6.5 bets like yours.
The scoring method has no bearing on that..Comment -
Betradar provides all the odds and results for that bookmaker. I guess I should email them.Comment -
that fight was comical. i feel bad whomever wasted money on that.Comment -
Officials should be put in jail
lol look who they were..Vinnie Paz a compulsive gambler and drunk that lost all his boxing earnings and two other losersComment -
YOu guys still talking about this? LOL
Comment -
From what I read it's due to the over 90% of bets on Tyson that they decide to void it.
Which does sound a little bit better than voiding to avoid paying Draw bets.
But a dogs breakfast still.
I'm surprised any gambling regulator approved of them offering odds on it to start with, in hindsight..Comment -
That’s terrible the thing was riggedComment -
Yeah, it was widely publicized as a sparring event and with the judges not even in house it's a little weird.
I can see why they wanted to offer odds, they were showing the odds during the broadcast and it was sponsored by the book. There must have been tons of interest.
The Legends Only League will have future events, it will be interesting how they handle those betting wise.Comment
