I smell a trap.
If there is such thing as a trap game.
pologq
SBR Posting Legend
10-07-12
19899
#2
i think there will be some fitzmagic. it is a game that the seahawks should win which makes me a little scared.
Comment
Chi_archie
SBR Aristocracy
07-22-08
63172
#3
I like it as an under the radar dog
people always get way too high on a team and/or QB through the first few weeks of NFL
Comment
lakerboy
SBR Aristocracy
04-02-09
94379
#4
Looks like a trap but it could be a reverse trap
Comment
stevenash
Moderator
01-17-11
65681
#5
Originally posted by lakerboy
Looks like a trap but it could be a reverse trap
It's one of those games if you bet the 'Hawks -6 and they win 28-24 you lose and "say, I knew it was a trap"
Or you bet the 'Fins +6 thinking it's a trap any you are smart sharp and Seattle rolls say 31-14 you say "maybe there is no such thing as a trap"
Comment
JIBBBY
SBR Aristocracy
12-10-09
83686
#6
Hawks probably cover. Hard to bet against Wilson and the way he's playing right now.
Comment
stevenash
Moderator
01-17-11
65681
#7
Originally posted by JIBBBY
Hawks probably cover. Hard to bet against Wilson and the way he's playing right now.
That's what I'm thinking.
Just to be safe, Rams/Seahawks teaser.
Make Seattle a pick, make Rams -6
Comment
stevek173
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
03-29-08
27598
#8
Damn that line is fishy. Should be more like +11. Yup I smell a trap.
Comment
WvGambler
SBR Posting Legend
04-19-10
11618
#9
It’s a trap disguised as a trap. Seahawks by double digits.
Comment
juicername
SBR Hall of Famer
10-14-15
6906
#10
Looks like a disguised reverse reverse trap letdown lookahead situation.
Comment
JIBBBY
SBR Aristocracy
12-10-09
83686
#11
Comment
stevenash
Moderator
01-17-11
65681
#12
Originally posted by juicername
Looks like a disguised reverse reverse trap letdown lookahead situation.
In a non conference game yet.
Comment
Zlaniner
SBR MVP
08-12-19
1697
#13
NO
Trap game is ATL/GB
Comment
lakerboy
SBR Aristocracy
04-02-09
94379
#14
Trap is zona-3.
Comment
JayDr3am
SBR Posting Legend
05-06-14
18260
#15
Originally posted by WvGambler
It’s a trap disguised as a trap. Seahawks by double digits.
this comment gave me tropic thunder vibes
Comment
Art Vandelay
SBR Hall of Famer
09-11-06
6690
#16
Real trap game is the Colts -2.5 at Chitown. Just sitting on 2.5 begging us to take the Colts. Bears the play!
Comment
pologq
SBR Posting Legend
10-07-12
19899
#17
Originally posted by Art Vandelay
Real trap game is the Colts -2.5 at Chitown. Just sitting on 2.5 begging us to take the Colts. Bears the play!
agreed. like the bears for that reason.
i feel like the seahawks should be at least -8. falling below the 7 is funny to me.
Comment
jjgold
SBR Aristocracy
07-20-05
388179
#18
Anybody can hang with anybody it’s national football league
Comment
Kermit
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
09-27-10
32555
#19
Already on the game over 61.5
Comment
jm8122
SBR Wise Guy
03-08-15
738
#20
Originally posted by Kermit
Already on the game over 61.5
Alt line at plus odds?
Comment
hawkwind
SBR MVP
04-25-11
4069
#21
YES
Comment
Orbison
SBR MVP
09-07-20
4691
#22
Seahawks defense is terrible so it's possible
Comment
marcoloco
SBR MVP
07-05-10
3986
#23
Fitzmagic coming to play. Fins ML
Comment
stacyleighhanson
SBR MVP
11-02-19
1109
#24
Easy cover for the Seahawks
Comment
Kermit
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
09-27-10
32555
#25
Originally posted by jm8122
Alt line at plus odds?
Yeah, +200.
Comment
beavis13
SBR MVP
06-18-14
2823
#26
Yea weird line. Over is my play.
Comment
KRIT
SBR Posting Legend
01-11-14
12878
#27
Seahawks are pretty banged up on the defensive side coming into this game. I think Fins can put up points, but don’t see how they can slow Wilson and the offense. Their totals have all been sailing way over, could be the case again.
Comment
Slurry Pumper
SBR MVP
06-18-18
2811
#28
Yeah the Flipper boys can hang with the Seabags, it is another any given sunday after all. Seattle has historically had a rough time in Miami. Seattles pass D sucks really and Fitz-(magic or tragic) can show up and play. i see an over the total play here but expect that Seattle will squeak out a cover but it may not be as easy as the world thinks. I would also watch out for a couple of picks by the Miami D here. Their corners did play allot better last week.
Comment
BeatTheJerk
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
08-19-07
31794
#29
Originally posted by stevenash
It's one of those games if you bet the 'Hawks -6 and they win 28-24 you lose and "say, I knew it was a trap"
Or you bet the 'Fins +6 thinking it's a trap any you are smart sharp and Seattle rolls say 31-14 you say "maybe there is no such thing as a trap"
Basically heads or tails in your eyes, no edge/advantage. I see it the same way ...
Comment
cecil127
SBR Hall of Famer
11-19-09
7310
#30
theres no way the hawks cover. dropping line, banged up d and every phuckin parlay I have rides on 'em....fish keep it close at the very least.
Comment
BeatTheJerk
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
08-19-07
31794
#31
Originally posted by cecil127
theres no way the hawks cover. dropping line, banged up d and every phuckin parlay I have rides on 'em....fish keep it close at the very least.
Cecil Collins ?
Comment
JayLA
SBR Hall of Famer
09-11-12
7806
#32
Fins secondary decimated. lBers a liability in coverage..... No one really knows hows "next man up" will work here....I'd stay away
Comment
pavyracer
SBR Aristocracy
04-12-07
82840
#33
You don't put money on Firzpatrick.
Comment
StackinGreen
SBR Posting Legend
10-09-10
12140
#34
I say over first (depending on your number) and Dolphins spread or ML second.
Better to tease the overs, I think they might lose straight but they'll still be close even though most of the books are wildly covering for squares who keep pressing numbers higher.
Comment
BeatTheJerk
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
08-19-07
31794
#35
Originally posted by StackinGreen
I say over first (depending on your number) and Dolphins spread or ML second.
Better to tease the overs, I think they might lose straight but they'll still be close even though most of the books are wildly covering for squares who keep pressing numbers higher.
You don’t talk like a fuckin’ doctor I gotta “tell ya”.Having said that, not
questioning the validity of your profession.