This is garbage.
Cameroon getting robbed
Collapse
X
-
lakerboySBR Aristocracy
- 04-02-09
- 94383
#1Cameroon getting robbedTags: None -
shadymcgradySBR Posting Legend
- 02-27-12
- 10036
#2Tell me about it, I had the first half underComment -
thomorinoRestricted User
- 06-01-17
- 45842
#3yeah agree, what the fuk is VAR for. They are only suppose to be overturning calls that are clear and obvious, she was at most offside by a half an inch, that's not clear and obvious.Comment -
packerd_00SBR Posting Legend
- 05-22-13
- 17832
#4To hell with Cameroon, spitting on the English players. Vile. If you lost money im not trying to rub it in,I just dont feel bad for them.Comment -
funnyb25BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 07-09-09
- 39663
#5I rarely even watch soccer on TV anymore. VAR has completely ruined the game and has been used incorrectly ever since introduced. It was introduced to fix clear and obvious error, and instead it is just completely re-officiating the game.
They need to get rid of it. Unless of course, it gives the fix what they need.Comment -
2daBankSBR Aristocracy
- 01-26-09
- 88966
#6Originally posted by funnyb25I rarely even watch soccer on TV anymore. VAR has completely ruined the game and has been used incorrectly ever since introduced. It was introduced to fix clear and obvious error, and instead it is just completely re-officiating the game.
They need to get rid of it. Unless of course, it gives the fix what they need.Comment -
jtolerBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-17-13
- 30967
#7quite a few matches have been ruined this world cup by bsComment -
daneblazerBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-14-08
- 27861
#8They’re probably used to itComment -
packerd_00SBR Posting Legend
- 05-22-13
- 17832
#9Originally posted by funnyb25I rarely even watch soccer on TV anymore. VAR has completely ruined the game and has been used incorrectly ever since introduced. It was introduced to fix clear and obvious error, and instead it is just completely re-officiating the game.
They need to get rid of it. Unless of course, it gives the fix what they need.
Comment -
pavyracerSBR Aristocracy
- 04-12-07
- 82899
#10Mark my words. In 5 years VAR would be history. It creates more controversy than solved. Both England's goals first half were bogus. First one the back pass was not intentional. It happens all the time in men leagues and they never call it. It has to be an intentional pass to the goalie to avoid moving the ball forward.
The second goal it was a judgement call on the offside. But then given the fact that the first goal was a ref error it shouldn't have counted. In football and baseball the refs and umpires make up calls all the time when a questionable call for a holding was given earlier or a ball was called a strike and vice versa.
Now the Cameroon goal was also a judgement call but since they were already fukked up already on 2 previous calls they should have been given the benefit of a doubt.Comment -
funnyb25BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 07-09-09
- 39663
-
packerd_00SBR Posting Legend
- 05-22-13
- 17832
#12Originally posted by funnyb25I remember that, and that was clear and obvious error. What they are overturning in today's game is not. They are just using VAR to re-do opinion on plays which is total bullshit.Comment -
thomorinoRestricted User
- 06-01-17
- 45842
#13The problem isn't VAR its there is no clear standard for overturning plays. If the standard is what FIFA says it is, clear and obvious, you can't overturn plays every game for being offsides by 1 inch, which is what happened in the Cameroon game.Comment -
swordsandtequilaSBR Hall of Famer
- 02-23-12
- 9762
#14Both calls regarding offsides were correct. Stop whining
They're going to look at all goals, close or not.Comment -
2daBankSBR Aristocracy
- 01-26-09
- 88966
#15Originally posted by swordsandtequilaBoth calls regarding offsides were correct. Stop whining
They're going to look at all goals, close or not.Comment -
swordsandtequilaSBR Hall of Famer
- 02-23-12
- 9762
#17Originally posted by 2daBankI dunno why but I believe this guy!!Comment -
funnyb25BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 07-09-09
- 39663
#18Another VAR for no reason in France matchComment -
funnyb25BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 07-09-09
- 39663
#19Another bullshit call. That is terrible.Comment -
pavyracerSBR Aristocracy
- 04-12-07
- 82899
#20You can't interfere with the goalie in the box. It's in the rules.Comment -
funnyb25BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 07-09-09
- 39663
#21Originally posted by pavyracerYou can't interfere with the goalie in the box. It's in the rules.Comment -
Emily_HainesSBR Posting Legend
- 04-14-09
- 15917
#22They should get rid of replay in all sports. All it does is slow the game down and piss people off.Comment -
pavyracerSBR Aristocracy
- 04-12-07
- 82899
#23Originally posted by funnyb25Goalie did not have possession of the ball. The only thing marginal there was a hand ball into the net which wasn't clear and obvious. That point of VAR is not being maintained at all. In fact, it is the complete opposite.
Here is how the rule is worded in FIFA Laws of the Game.
"It is an offence to restrict the movement of the goalkeeper by unfairly impeding him".Comment -
dlowillySBR Posting Legend
- 11-09-16
- 13862
#24Originally posted by packerd_00To hell with Cameroon, spitting on the English players. Vile. If you lost money im not trying to rub it in,I just dont feel bad for them.
She's from Cameroon too so it's almost like throwing a knife at her considering what might be in that stuffComment -
packerd_00SBR Posting Legend
- 05-22-13
- 17832
#25Originally posted by dlowillyWow I didn't see that, unrealComment -
lakerboySBR Aristocracy
- 04-02-09
- 94383
#26Originally posted by dlowillyWow I didn't see that, unrealComment -
2daBankSBR Aristocracy
- 01-26-09
- 88966
#27Originally posted by funnyb25Goalie did not have possession of the ball. The only thing marginal there was a hand ball into the net which wasn't clear and obvious. That point of VAR is not being maintained at all. In fact, it is the complete opposite.Comment -
packerd_00SBR Posting Legend
- 05-22-13
- 17832
#28Originally posted by lakerboyIt wasn't on purposeComment -
fried cheeseSBR MVP
- 09-17-13
- 4465
#29Originally posted by lakerboyIt wasn't on purposeComment -
lakerboySBR Aristocracy
- 04-02-09
- 94383
#30Originally posted by packerd_00Says who,and besides what does that matter.Comment -
thomorinoRestricted User
- 06-01-17
- 45842
#31Every player has a right to the ball, the French player hit the ball when the goalie didn't have control - there was nothing even close to obvious about the call. Replay has its place for obvious calls, like if the ball crossed the goaline or not, quesitonable fouls shouldn't be reviewed unless they are clear and obvious, and that one wasn't even close to being an obvious foul.Comment -
packerd_00SBR Posting Legend
- 05-22-13
- 17832
#32Originally posted by lakerboyGo and look at the replay. It was arm to spit not spit to armComment -
lakerboySBR Aristocracy
- 04-02-09
- 94383
#33Originally posted by packerd_00Mate she had flem all over her arm. I dont want hear no bullshit excuses.Comment -
thomorinoRestricted User
- 06-01-17
- 45842
#34Goalline technology is great but VAR has been a shit show, the main issue has been no one knows what a clear and obvious error is, they are consistently overturning 50/50 calls.Comment -
packerd_00SBR Posting Legend
- 05-22-13
- 17832
#35Originally posted by lakerboyFeel however you like. You obviously didn't watch what happened. I personally don't care about that. The ref was a retard in this matchComment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code