Originally posted by USCPHILLYGUY
-
The puck was under his pad - Ovi jammed the goalie to push the puck in. Can't do that ... that's why the review[s] took about 30sec each.Comment -
... and there was an early whistle ... usually trumps everything, but not always - NHL can be a bit ambiguous with some aspects of review, but it's getting better.Originally posted by USCPHILLYGUYComment -
Explained well here -Originally posted by USCPHILLYGUY
Puck was loose. But he had to initiate contact with the goalie to play the puck over the line.Comment -
Good stuff. Appears goalie has all the power when pucks loose in the crease.Originally posted by PhillipKesselExplained well here -
Puck was loose. But he had to initiate contact with the goalie to play the puck over the line.Comment -
Give us a winner about the sport you know so much about and save this thread....Originally posted by PhillipKesselExplained well here -
Puck was loose. But he had to initiate contact with the goalie to play the puck over the line.Comment -
I have both home teams winning 4-3 tonight ... so San Jose at -115 best bet along with the overs.Originally posted by JayLAComment -
Originally posted by goduke<br>Originally posted by goduke
<br>
What's the reasoning? They've won all three at home, and blew them out last one. Carolina's giving them a fight, but why exactly would Washington "be in trouble"?Comment -
No trouble.Originally posted by godukeComment -
Another overtime game amazingComment -
Yes actually big troubleOriginally posted by k13Comment -
You were saying? Bumps my quote at 2-0. Way to go champOriginally posted by k13Comment -
That’s whyOriginally posted by magpie878Comment -
K13 is one of the worse hockey predictors on this site. You can find thread after thread every year in the playoffs where he is wrong. He disappears afterwards.Originally posted by lakerboyComment -
You didn't even answer the question... too difficult to give your reasoning behind a statement?Originally posted by goduke
And props for not acknowledging it until after the fact. Winner!Comment -
the accuracy of hindsight is amazing, no?Originally posted by magpie878Comment -
Didn’t need to give my reason. I’m not writing a thesis. And I called the Boston series and the sharks series. I’ve been around here long enough that if I get something wrong I’ll admit it. But what’s reasoning going to get? You would then criticize it then I would win and you wouldn’t say anything afterwardsOriginally posted by magpie878Comment -
What hindsight? I said it before the game and it won. I’ve been around here long enoughOriginally posted by shocka1212Comment -
They might not have seen your other thread where you made that prediction. Don't think you actually said it here in this one. Or am I confusing this with the Bruins/Sharks prediction???Originally posted by godukeComment -
Yeah I said the Carolina one in here. The sharks and bruins one I think I’ve said just in my threadOriginally posted by hotcrossComment
