Lol Ending Of Iowa St. Game

PaperTrail07 · 02-05-19, 11:21 AM

100% it was penetrating painful.....considering the bum that made it as well what a penetrating joke........that POS......only a bum gets that excited to cruise the court for a worthless bucket and then to not notice it was late smh just WOW>......such a bad beat....has to make it THEN have fools count it......

Originally posted by shocka1212

They'll say it doesn't affect the outcome of the game which is horse shit because a reach in fouls is the same 2 minutes into the game as it is with 20 seconds left and a tie game.. they're so arbitrary with what they turn the blind eye to that it's frustrating to be in this spot because we've seen "meaningless" fouls and timeouts with 1.2 seconds left to get a game over the total... rig jobs all over and this is just another one

johnnygooble · 02-05-19, 11:32 AM

lol need to stay away from brandonlang also

Jkon9 · 02-05-19, 11:36 AM

Originally posted by mdunlap3

it was close, but he got it off.

Another picture shows it easily still in his hands with the red light on. There’s a video on YouTube from the action network that clearly shows it. Got robbed

stake1 · 02-05-19, 12:13 PM

Is Heritage going to do anything?

That is a crooked outcome! Clearly no good and Iowa State wins by 4!!!

funnyb25 · 02-05-19, 12:26 PM

Here is a pic I took of the slow mo freeze.

Also, start at 2:40 and slow mo it....It wasn't even close. Way late..

shocka1212 · 02-05-19, 12:36 PM

Originally posted by funnyb25

Here is a pic I took of the slow mo freeze.

Also, start at 2:40 and slow mo it....It wasn't even close. Way late..

that step back 3 pointer at the 2:29 mark is just downright nasty.

funnyb25 · 02-05-19, 12:38 PM

Originally posted by shocka1212

that step back 3 pointer at the 2:29 mark is just downright nasty.

Yes it was. And the 3 pointer after the buzzer was downright late and nasty. Lol

shocka1212 · 02-05-19, 12:39 PM

Originally posted by funnyb25

Yes it was. And the 3 pointer after the buzzer was downright late and nasty. Lol

complete rig job... look at those players on Iowa St.. you want me to believe they aren't getting paid to play at a state school in that dumpster fire of a state?

PaperTrail07 · 02-05-19, 12:45 PM

If I am the one booking that---you MAY get a "sorry about your luck " LOL.....they don't owe you anything for Oaklahoma's blind refs AND scorekeeper LOL...

Originally posted by stake1

Is Heritage going to do anything?

That is a crooked outcome! Clearly no good and Iowa State wins by 4!!!

PaperTrail07 · 02-05-19, 12:46 PM

That penetrating kid couldn't do that twice if he tried...that was his second bucket of the game I believe.....there was no rig job....just complete IDIOTS behind the wheel that forgot to ref the end of the game correctly...smh...

Originally posted by shocka1212

complete rig job... look at those players on Iowa St.. you want me to believe they aren't getting paid to play at a state school in that dumpster fire of a state?

LT Profits · 02-05-19, 01:35 PM

I didn't mind one bit, had Over 146.

JoeCool20 · 02-05-19, 01:55 PM

Why did they not review it to see if the shot came after the 00 mark?

They didn't review it because it didn't affect the outcome of the game?

PaperTrail07 · 02-05-19, 02:35 PM

They didn't give a shit.....

Originally posted by JoeCool20

Why did they not review it to see if the shot came after the 00 mark?

They didn't review it because it didn't affect the outcome of the game?

LT Profits · 02-05-19, 03:34 PM

Originally posted by JoeCool20

They didn't review it because it didn't affect the outcome of the game?

Yes, exactly. They usually review anything close if it happens within a game, regardless of the score, but not at 0:00

RudyRuetigger · 02-05-19, 03:41 PM

the light and horn are the official end of the game

it was in his hands

guys looking at the .1 are wrong

funnyb25 · 02-05-19, 03:42 PM

Originally posted by LT Profits

Yes, exactly. They usually review anything close if it happens within a game, regardless of the score, but not at 0:00

Nor at -0:02

Brutus84 · 02-05-19, 04:34 PM

Was barely late if at all. I slow mowed it several times. I was expecting it to be super late the way some of you talked about it.

ChuckyTheGoat · 02-05-19, 04:55 PM

He beat buzzer for sure. Not sure about sync to timer.

JoeCool20 · 02-05-19, 05:28 PM

Originally posted by LT Profits

Yes, exactly. They usually review anything close if it happens within a game, regardless of the score, but not at 0:00

I think it is just because it didn't change the winner of the game.

I had one a while back and the dude won the game at the 0:00 buzzer, and he went jumping into the stand high-fiving people, then they reviewed it and said he got the shot off AFTER the buzzer and they took the win away.

So it HAS to be that they just don't review it if it doesn't change the winner of the game.

LT Profits · 02-05-19, 06:26 PM

Originally posted by JoeCool20

I think it is just because it didn't change the winner of the game.

I had one a while back and the dude won the game at the 0:00 buzzer, and he went jumping into the stand high-fiving people, then they reviewed it and said he got the shot off AFTER the buzzer and they took the win away.

So it HAS to be that they just don't review it if it doesn't change the winner of the game.

Right, that is what I was saying "yes exactly" to. Now if something reviewable happens with say one second left on the clock, the refs usually review it regardless of the score, even in blowouts. But if something questionable happens on the final play with the clock at 0:00, they do not bother unless it affects the outcome as you said.

jtoler · 02-05-19, 06:30 PM

Originally posted by LT Profits

Right, that is what I was saying "yes exactly" to. Now if something reviewable happens with say one second left on the clock, the refs usually review it regardless of the score, even in blowouts. But if something questionable happens on the final play with the clock at 0:00, they do not bother unless it affects the outcome as you said.

which is hogwash since, hello, didnt the u.s. just start approving gambling so they know people are gambling on these games and it matters but theyve always known we gamble on them and its always mattered to us

JoeCool20 · 02-05-19, 08:07 PM

Yeah it is hogwash to gamblers!

I think the NBA would review that regardless. Just not college.

lonegambler23 · 02-05-19, 08:23 PM

Originally posted by Brock Landers

Had Iowa St ML

Didn't even watch the end after they hit the 2nd free throw to go up 4

of course you did, Brock JUICE landers

TheMoneyShot · 02-05-19, 09:34 PM

In the NBA... don't they check if the last shot is good or not.... regardless if it's meaningless to the outcome of the game?

shocka1212 · 02-05-19, 10:50 PM

Originally posted by TheMoneyShot

In the NBA... don't they check if the last shot is good or not.... regardless if it's meaningless to the outcome of the game?

Yes. They also review 3's vs 2's even if it's a quarter later

PaperTrail07 · 02-12-19, 01:36 PM

My god that ending is HAUNTING ME lol... Oak hits miracle 3 at buzzer to hit over for first half.....reviewd and pulled off board LOL...my god..

funnyb25 · 02-12-19, 01:47 PM

I've said it a million times and it is killing folks, but the NCAA as a whole refuses to accept gambling as part of their sport.