Sunday teaser

[firedawg]

Running bad
Hope to get things back on track here
Gl posters


Balty over 36 to Chicago-.5


Cheers

[Hman]

I'd feel more confident with a teaser today as well.

Stumped otherwise

[Easy-Rider 66]

Looks good on Paper. LIke the Over in SD game. Philly scares me. See a clsoe game on PHilly + the number. GL.

[USCPHILLYGUY]

1st game was 22-10 balty so I prob would have went the other way.

Like the bears play. Everyone falling into what philly did last year. 2 major factors different this year. Philly no running game and playing on the road. This one has 24-10 written all over it.

Good luck dawg

[jjgold]

Dawg your due

common man and hit it

[JamesBrown]

BOL. Bolts +9, Eagles +12.5 looks decent as well. Cheers

[Joey Vigs]

GL Dawgy. Balty game such a head scratcher. Always been a big Rivers fan and want to pull the trigger badly on them but can’t seem to do it. I think it might be a little much for them to win today.

[KRIT]

Teasers usually aren’t the answer to get you back on track.

[DJK]

Running bad
Hope to get things back on track here
Gl posters


Balty over 36 to Chicago-.5


Cheers

Why not just tease Baltimore and Chicago and not mess with the over and under at all?

I took Baltimore -150 and Chicago -265 on a ML parlay which pays +129.

This was strictly based on going against the public as 61% on the Chargers at SBR and 73% on the Chargers at Sports Insights.

David Payne Purdum also twitted the following.

Chargers at Ravens (-3 (-105), 42): 2.5x more bets, 2.5x as much money has been wagered on the Chargers @CaesarsPalace books, per @The_Junkyard.



Same with Philadelphia vs Chicago. More betting on Philadelphia and yet the line moved up.

He also said that over on the Chargers vs the Ravens is a liability for the books meaning more money is on that side. If I could, I would always go against the public and against more money.

[DJK]

Never had a twitter account, but I just signed up just so I can follow David Payne Purdum.

Each and every time he reported a lopsided bets on ESPN, except for that one weekend in November where all books are got hurt because the majority of the favorites covered, books' liabilities all came through meaning public almost always lost badly.

[DJK]

Chargers ar Ravens (-3 (-105) 42.5): More than 70 percent of bets are on Chargers but “big bets are on the Ravens to even us out,” says @jsimbal.


The public gets it right sometimes, but I would say more often not.

[lakerboy]

GL Dawgy. Balty game such a head scratcher. Always been a big Rivers fan and want to pull the trigger badly on them but can’t seem to do it. I think it might be a little much for them to win today.

Totally agree with this

[Joey Vigs]

Took Chargers +3. Had to.

[USCPHILLYGUY]

Get em dawg! You got a shot here