U.S.A. Unemployment Rate Falls to 18-Year Low : Solid Hiring in May

[pilebuck13]

Douchebag can brag about the low black unimployment rate. What will he say when thousands of Americans start losing their jobs over the tariffs he's imposing on our Allies?????

Do you have a fukin clue about how badly America gets fuked on trade? Because if you did you wouldn’t be saying what your saying.

[khicks26]

Those tax cuts for the rich enable those business owners to expand and grow which creates more jobs.. Rather then being taxed thru the roof and have to close and move their businesses to other Countries to exploit cheaper labor..

Understand economics Knicks, read up on what is happening.. You do not want to squeeze the rich... They are the engine that drives the economy and creates all the jobs for the little people...

The rich also re-invest and spend that wealth in our economies if they feel financial security and see a profit surplus... Can even offer higher wagers then...

This is what we see happening now under Trump in America which we didn't under Obama.. Small business owners are profiting now as well. It's not rocket science to see what has happened with our growing economy.. Tax relief and restrictions lifted for big business is what Trump did since being elected and that has stimulated our American economy...
It's working...

[Venom72]

Do you have a fukin clue about how badly America gets fuked on trade? Because if you did you wouldn’t be saying what your saying.

So why has it never been an issue then???? Obama bush clinton nobody was trying to do shit beforehand, left it alone for a reason, but your daddy trump comes along and like the true sheep you are believes everything his dumbass says and suddenly its horrible for america, NOBODY benefits from a trade war and ppl are gonna get fukked over, where was you at in school when this shit was being taught?

[Sam Odom]

‘Trade War’ was a large issue in Trump’s campaign.... he is just trying to do what he said

He won

[RoyBacon]

So why has it never been an issue then???? Obama bush clinton nobody was trying to do shit beforehand, left it alone for a reason, but your daddy trump comes along and like the true sheep you are believes everything his dumbass says and suddenly its horrible for america, NOBODY benefits from a trade war and ppl are gonna get fukked over, where was you at in school when this shit was being taught?

Bernie Sanders promised the same strategy Trump is pursuing. Why? Because it greatly benefits the working poor.

In fact liberals including Obama "talked" about fair trade for a generation. But because they are libtards they now, suddenly, are against doing what is necessary to have fair trade.

[pilebuck13]

So why has it never been an issue then???? Obama bush clinton nobody was trying to do shit beforehand, left it alone for a reason, but your daddy trump comes along and like the true sheep you are believes everything his dumbass says and suddenly its horrible for america, NOBODY benefits from a trade war and ppl are gonna get fukked over, where was you at in school when this shit was being taught?

Venom, what kinda clowns they got running around sbr these days? So it’s fair trade to be taxed but tax other countries 0? get the fuk outta here.

[PAULYPOKER]

As I said capitalism is eating itself. No jobs, no buying power. Who is going to buy the stuff that AI produces?

Classical Economist thought that by now we would be working 10 hours a week. That is how AI could benefit all. Work less for the same pay.

So either we kill off Billions of people (which maybe the plan) or working people revolt & quit taking the scraps of the rich.

Americans are too selfish to fight.......
Using the "that won't happen to me" approach..........

Meanwhile>>>>>>>

[khicks26]

Americans are too selfish to fight.......
Using the "that won't happen to me" approach..........

Meanwhile>>>>>>>

LOL So your leaning toward population decrease.

[Kermit]

Americans are too selfish to fight.......
Using the "that won't happen to me" approach..........

Meanwhile>>>>>

[khicks26]

[guitarjosh]

There's enough in the world for everyone's needs. Not enough for everyone's greed.

Ghandi said it and it rhymes, so it must be true.

Look up world wide per capita GDP adjusted for PPP, then look at total US government spending. If you divided everything produced a year equally, you couldn’t even pay for all government per capita spending in America, let alone pay people any wage.

[khicks26]

Ghandi said it and it rhymes, so it must be true.

Look up world wide per capita GDP adjusted for PPP, then look at total US government spending. If you divided everything produced a year equally, you couldn’t even pay for all government per capita spending in America, let alone pay people any wage.

LOL So your leaning toward population decrease.

[guitarjosh]

LOL So your leaning toward population decrease.

No, production increase.

[khicks26]

Ghandi said it and it rhymes, so it must be true.

Look up world wide per capita GDP adjusted for PPP, then look at total US government spending. If you divided everything produced a year equally, you couldn’t even pay for all government per capita spending in America, let alone pay people any wage.

Considering we consume 25% of the worlds goods & only 5% of the population. Spend more on the military than the next 9 countries combined & the Pentagon can not be audited while Billions go unaccounted for.

You maybe right, but it doesn't make it true.

[khicks26]

No, production increase.

I get it, you don't like Ghandi.

Greed has a different meaning for some

[khicks26]

No, production increase.

AI is you friend, if your not in the mob.

[guitarjosh]

Considering we consume 25% of the worlds goods & only 5% of the population. Spend more on the military than the next 9 countries combined & the Pentagon can not be audited while Billions go unaccounted for.

You maybe right, but it doesn't make it true.

Considering we produce about 25% of the world's goods, I'd say we're fine. Even if we eliminated all military spending, we couldn't pay for all spending going if we divided everything produced every year around the world.

I maybe right, but still saying something wrong. This might be my favorite Khicksism yet.

[khicks26]

Considering we produce about 25% of the world's goods, I'd say we're fine. Even if we eliminated all military spending, we couldn't pay for all spending going if we divided everything produced every year around the world.

I maybe right, but still saying something wrong. This might be my favorite Khicksism yet.

Here's one for you. Josh has an answer for everything & thinks he's never wrong. Even if proven wrong. So what's the point of proving him wrong.

If you took 1/2 of what Jeff Bezos has. You could solve world hunger & house the homeless in the US.

and he would still be a rich prick. Don't tell me Ghandi is wrong, when you don't really know.

[DwightShrute]

Here's one for you. Josh has an answer for everything & thinks he's never wrong. Even if proven wrong. So what's the point of proving him wrong.

If you took 1/2 of what Jeff Bezos has. You could solve world hunger & house the homeless in the US.

and he would still be a rich prick. Don't tell me Ghandi is wrong, when you don't really know.

you don't see the irony in that statement? Seriously?

[khicks26]

Considering we produce about 25% of the world's goods, I'd say we're fine. Even if we eliminated all military spending, we couldn't pay for all spending going if we divided everything produced every year around the world.

I maybe right, but still saying something wrong. This might be my favorite Khicksism yet.

and just were do the resources to produce those goods come from?

[khicks26]

you don't see the irony in that statement? Seriously?

No, but I'm sure you do. You know irony well.

Plus all you do is agree with Josh. So what is your point?

[pilebuck13]

Here's one for you. Josh has an answer for everything & thinks he's never wrong. Even if proven wrong. So what's the point of proving him wrong.

If you took 1/2 of what Jeff Bezos has. You could solve world hunger & house the homeless in the US.

and he would still be a rich prick. Don't tell me Ghandi is wrong, when you don't really know.

90 percent of the homeless in the us are drug addicts or alcoholics are you kidding me?

[DwightShrute]

[guitarjosh]

Here's one for you. Josh has an answer for everything & thinks he's never wrong. Even if proven wrong. So what's the point of proving him wrong.

If you took 1/2 of what Jeff Bezos has. You could solve world hunger & house the homeless in the US.

and he would still be a rich prick. Don't tell me Ghandi is wrong, when you don't really know.

Show me when you've proven me wrong.

You could also stop buying cable, Netflix, Hulu, etc, and use that money to end world hunger. There's more money spent there than there is in Jeff Bezos' bank account. Here's the problem you don't understand: Jeff Bezos' net worth is from the Amazon stock he owns. If you force him to sell, that stock is now worth a lot less since much of the value of the stock comes from Bezos owning it, and all you've done is made a temporary fix. What will you do next year, take half of Warren Buffet's net wealth? Making the most productive people in society work and not receive what they worked for is a great way to get them to stop producing. If your solution to world hunger is confiscating wealth, you've destroyed any incentive to get wealth by producing for the rest of society. The better answer is to have people like you cancel your Netflix subscriptions and give that money, but the best answer is to produce more food for everyone.

I do know. Worldwide GDP is about 78 trillion. Worldwide population is 7.2 billion. That means we're producing about $11,000 worth of goods and services a year per person in the world. US government spending per capita is more than that, meaning if we divided up everything produced in the world a year, the US government, without all the things you want it to pay for, like college for all, health care for all, would have to take a massive spending cut as is, and you wouldn't get a penny in income at your current productivity levels.

[khicks26]

90 percent of the homeless in the us are drug addicts or alcoholics are you kidding me?

Last I heard, about a Million of the homeless were children. About 60% work a fulltime job.

It would also cost less to put them in a house than leave them on the street. That's what Utah did anyway.

If you wait a min Josh will have GDP per capita BS story why we need a million homeless children. LOL

[guitarjosh]

and just were do the resources to produce those goods come from?

All over the world. We pay for them. If you disagree with that and think we take those resources and that upsets you, just remember that you're the one who advocated taking half of Jeff Bezos' net worth and advocate the redistribution of wealth.

Like I keep saying, the left can be summed up by, "Use the government as a weapon to make the groups we love better off at the expense of the groups we hate".

[khicks26]

Show me when you've proven me wrong.

You could also stop buying cable, Netflix, Hulu, etc, and use that money to end world hunger. There's more money spent there than there is in Jeff Bezos' bank account. Here's the problem you don't understand: Jeff Bezos' net worth is from the Amazon stock he owns. If you force him to sell, that stock is now worth a lot less since much of the value of the stock comes from Bezos owning it, and all you've done is made a temporary fix. What will you do next year, take half of Warren Buffet's net wealth? Making the most productive people in society work and not receive what they worked for is a great way to get them to stop producing. If your solution to world hunger is confiscating wealth, you've destroyed any incentive to get wealth by producing for the rest of society. The better answer is to have people like you cancel your Netflix subscriptions and give that money, but the best answer is to produce more food for everyone.

I do know. Worldwide GDP is about 78 trillion. Worldwide population is 7.2 billion. That means we're producing about $11,000 worth of goods and services a year per person in the world. US government spending per capita is more than that, meaning if we divided up everything produced in the world a year, the US government, without all the things you want it to pay for, like college for all, health care for all, would have to take a massive spending cut as is, and you wouldn't get a penny in income at your current productivity levels.

I don't have to. That's the point. Your shit is one sided & never takes everything into account. If it did you wouldn't use it.


Go push your propaganda to someone that will buy it. I stopped a while ago.

[pimike]

Trump lost more American Jobs in his first year than Obama did in his last. The job growth is the same as Obama. Mostly Part time no benefits, subcontracting 1099's. The unemployment numbers are BS also, just like Obama's. People that stop looking for work are not counted. 20 to 30 million people. The real number is around 15 to 20%. Just like Obama.

Are you really this ignorant?

[khicks26]

All over the world. We pay for them. If you disagree with that and think we take those resources and that upsets you, just remember that you're the one who advocated taking half of Jeff Bezos' net worth and advocate the redistribution of wealth.

Like I keep saying, the left can be summed up by, "Use the government as a weapon to make the groups we love better off at the expense of the groups we hate".

All over the world? Now do you understand the need for a bloated military. Of course you don't. LOL


Well no government, we could make old Jeffery King & have the feudalism you long for.

[guitarjosh]

Are you really this ignorant?

He is. He actually said to this to me in post #119

You maybe right, but it doesn't make it true.

Believe it or not, he's actually said dumber stuff than that before. One time he told me that I wrote that I'd never read the book The Shock Doctrine. I never wrote that, and asked him to show me where I wrote it. He told me to find it, and if I can't find where I wrote it, that proves I wrote it. That was seriously his argument.

[khicks26]

Are you really this ignorant?

WOW all the right trolls are out tonight.

[guitarjosh]

All over the world? Now do you understand the need for a bloated military. Of course you don't. LOL


Well no government, we could make old Jeffery King & have the feudalism you long for.

So you're saying it's wrong to take the resources of other nations and people by force, yet you long for those policies to be put in place right here in America.

You want the government to make the groups you love better off at the expense of the groups you hate.

It's funny, Fredrich Hayek was a Nobel Prize winning economist who wrote a book called The Road to Serfdom, which is a warning against implementing the very policies you're advocating.

[khicks26]

He is. He actually said to this to me in post #119



Believe it or not, he's actually said dumber stuff than that before. One time he told me that I wrote that I'd never read the book The Shock Doctrine. I never wrote that, and asked him to show me where I wrote it. He told me to find it, and if I can't find where I wrote it, that proves I wrote it. That was seriously his argument.

I can't help if you don't get it Josh. Try rereading it. You sound a little unhappy with me. LOL


You said you read the notes. That's not reading the book.

[khicks26]

So you're saying it's wrong to take the resources of other nations and people by force, yet you long for those policies to be put in place right here in America.

You want the government to make the groups you love better off at the expense of the groups you hate.

It's funny, Fredrich Hayek was a Nobel Prize winning economist who wrote a book called The Road to Serfdom, which is a warning against implementing the very policies you're advocating.

This is the only part I read. As always Josh making shit up & putting words in my mouth.

The reason I don't talk to you that much. Your dishonest.

[pimike]

Facts are Obama didn’t get the blacks employed at the rate Trump has.

You have to give credit where it’s due.