finally...... DOJ reopens hiLIARy email investigation....

[Auto Donk]

dammit..... I had to rewatch this six times just to actually hear what this babe is saying.....

mind kept wandering and fantasizing this first five times about all the insane sexual shit I'd do this brunette babe narrator......

who is she?

[chico2663]

dammit..... I had to rewatch this six times just to actually hear what this babe is saying.....

mind kept wandering and fantasizing this first five times about all the insane sexual shit I'd do this brunette babe narrator......

who is she?

Was hillary wearing a wig? lol

[khicks26]

dammit..... I had to rewatch this six times just to actually hear what this babe is saying.....

mind kept wandering and fantasizing this first five times about all the insane sexual shit I'd do this brunette babe narrator......

who is she?

LOL Your funny dude.

Abby Martin

[khicks26]

Just goes to show that Trump isn't doing anything that the Clintons wouldn't have done.

[Auto Donk]

LOL Your funny dude.

Abby Martin

chico, if this is hiLIARy in a wig, I take back all of my cold chai seizure threads and will volunteer for her harris county, tx election committee in 2020

[dante1]

Do you think she's innocent?

Innocent of what? I will surely answer if I know the entire question. Tell me?

[Auto Donk]

Innocent of what? I will surely answer if I know the entire question. Tell me?

let's start with the classified information on her private server, Huma's and ultimately teen-pussy lover Weiner's laptop, all via hiLIARy

the same shit (violation of federal law) that got several other people put away/fired/dishonorably discharged from the military.....

[dante1]

let's start with the classified information on her private server, Huma's and ultimately teen-pussy lover Weiner's laptop, all via hiLIARy

the same shit (violation of federal law) that got several other people put away/fired/dishonorably discharged from the military.....

AD, are you the original author of the question?

[dante1]

well actually the original author doesn't really matter, I simply don't know because I am too lazy to check out the entire thread.

but the answer to the question, your question also is...yes she is absolutely innocent. there is another part to my answer but I will wait for some other response from you or somebody else.

[khicks26]

Innocent of what? I will surely answer if I know the entire question. Tell me?

How about over throwing Libya turning it into a failed state, funneling Gaddafi's weapons stash threw Benghazi to extremist groups for fighting in Syria.

Causing the deaths of thousands of people in the Middle East.

We came, We saw, He died.

[dante1]

How about over throwing Libya turning it into a failed state, funneling Gaddafi's weapons stash threw Benghazi to extremist groups for fighting in Syria.

Causing the deaths of thousands of people in the Middle East.

K, can I can back to you later on that. Please remind me again, I am not attempting to avoid the question. First, I need to speak to my R friends regarding this issue.

[khicks26]

K, can I can back to you later on that. Please remind me again, I am not attempting to avoid the question. First, I need to speak to my R friends regarding this issue.

Sure no problem. Take your time.

[dante1]

Sure no problem. Take your time.

just waiting for a reply to my answer? from my dear friends.

[dante1]

well either these people are busy, or getting a coffee or maybe they don't want to engage. I have difficulty getting many of my R friends to engage as you well know. but no problem, as always I give the benefit of the doubt. Hell, I don't hang around waiting for answers or questions either. so I am leaving


K, I have no real answer for you except this. any individual, who purposefully causes the death of any other individual should pay the price whether that person is a D or R or any other label. the problem for me is the proof. so yes, absolutely as the question was phrased HC is innocent. Obviously in our country you are completely innocent until proven guilty. You would think that my R friends would know that seeing the way they so vehemently defend DT.

[khicks26]

well either these people are busy, or getting a coffee or maybe they don't want to engage. I have difficulty getting many of my R friends to engage as you well know. but no problem, as always I give the benefit of the doubt. Hell, I don't hang around waiting for answers or questions either. so I am leaving


K, I have no real answer for you except this. any individual, who purposefully causes the death of any other individual should pay the price whether that person is a D or R or any other label. the problem for me is the proof. so yes, absolutely as the question was phrased HC is innocent. Obviously in our country you are completely innocent until proven guilty. You would think that my R friends would know that seeing the way they so vehemently defend DT.

That's my point. People like Trump & Clinton are not that different when it comes to the game of Empire.

Arms Deals with Saudi Arabia

Corporate backers.

Wall St cabinet.

War with Iran & NK.

Done strikes in the Middle East, death & destruction.

Israeli Occupation.

and on and on.

Trump is not acting much different than Clinton or Obama. Just more extreme.

[dante1]

That's my point. People like Trump & Clinton are not that different when it comes to the game of Empire.

Arms Deals with Saudi Arabia

Corporate backers.

Wall St cabinet.

War with Iran & NK.

Done strikes in the Middle East, death & destruction.

Israeli Occupation.

and on and on.

Trump is not acting much different than Clinton or Obama. Just more extreme.

you find no argument from me concerning this.

the only problem, IMO is selecting the best of the worst. and when selecting the best of the worst I will most always go with the D's. they somewhat represent the progressive side of politics, at least much more than the asshole party. I know, you know and many educated people know that the arch of justice in this world, which includes most Western democracies and certainly the USA, always or almost always learns toward the progressive cause. This is not an argument this is a fact. So when given a choice between what is at least somewhat close to progressive politics vs another party that isn't even in the same political ballpark I will always choose the former.

Does the decision sometimes find me defending ideas I am not crazy about, of course.

[khicks26]

you find no argument from me concerning this.

the only problem, IMO is selecting the best of the worst. and when selecting the best of the worst I will most always go with the D's. they somewhat represent the progressive side of politics, at least much more than the asshole party. I know, you know and many educated people know that the arch of justice in this world, which includes most Western democracies and certainly the USA, always or almost always learns toward the progressive cause. This is not an argument this is a fact. So when given a choice between what is at least somewhat close to progressive politics vs another party that isn't even in the same political ballpark I will always choose the former.

Does the decision sometimes find me defending ideas I am not crazy about, of course.

Fair enough. I can understand that. I choose to not take either side when they are wrong.

Nor do I partake in the lesser of two evils, which IMO leads to more evil over time, face it its still evil.

So maybe the question is, Why do the American people allow being given these shit choices in the first place?

[khicks26]

Inverted totalitarianism is a term coined by political philosopher Sheldon Wolin in 2003 to describe the emerging form of government of the United States. Wolin analysed the US as increasingly turning into a managed democracy (similar to an illiberal democracy). He uses the term "inverted totalitarianism" to draw attention to the totalitarian aspects of the US political system while emphasizing its differences from proper totalitarianism, such as Nazi and Stalinist regimes.^[1]

In Days of Destruction, Days of Revolt by Chris Hedges and Joe Sacco, inverted totalitarianism is described as a system where corporations have corrupted and subverted democracy and where economics trumps politics.^[2][3][4][5] Every natural resource and living being is commodified and exploited to the point of collapse, as the citizenry is lulled and manipulated into surrendering their liberties and their participation in government through excess consumerism and sensationalism

[khicks26]

If your interested Dante. Wolin is a political philosopher, WWII vet that flew bombing raids & not a voice you will see on TV.

[dante1]

I will check it out. TY.

I just noticed something a little strange, we both had the same W/L in both week 15 and week 14. Isn't that something. I wonder if Brooks can figure out the odds of that happening. lol Not in 100,000 years would he be able to do that.

where is the asshole today?

[dante1]

Fair enough. I can understand that. I choose to not take either side when they are wrong.

Nor do I partake in the lesser of two evils, which IMO leads to more evil over time, face it its still evil.

So maybe the question is, Why do the American people allow being given these shit choices in the first place?

maybe so my friend, but HC would have been a much better president than this asshole. hate her or love her nobody, not a fckin drunk pulled out of a bar would be or could be worse than the asshole in the WH today.

[khicks26]

maybe so my friend, but HC would have been a much better president than this asshole. hate her or love her nobody, not a fckin drunk pulled out of a bar would be or could be worse than the asshole in the WH today.

True, but Trump is a result of the failed policies going back to Carter on though to Obama. No president made the necessary changes to avoid a Trump.

Now imagine 4 or 8 years of Clinton, what kind of Trump would we get after that, & still may. Some one smarter, competent, a real charismatic leader?

I think you know the type of person I'm talking about.

Watch the vid, would love to know your opinion.

[dante1]

True, but Trump is a result of the failed policies going back to Carter on though to Obama. No president made the necessary changes to avoid a Trump.

Now imagine 4 or 8 years of Clinton, what kind of Trump would we get after that, & still may. Some one smarter, competent, a real charismatic leader?

I think you know the type of person I'm talking about.

just had the same conversation with my brother not even two hours ago. DT has given permission for future crazies, and people as stupid as he is to run and maybe even win powerful offices. I agree.

watched some of that video and maybe you gave that to me because I have made some of those exact points on this exact forum. How capitalism needs to be restrained, how easy it is for economic systems and political systems to be confused and conflated. maybe when I get a chance I will watch the rest, the problem is attempting to get the average American to even understand the problem. you can buy off the American voter with a very small tax savings.

[khicks26]

just had the same conversation with my brother not even two hours ago. DT has given permission for future crazies, and people as stupid as he is to run and maybe even win powerful offices. I agree.

watched some of that video and maybe you gave that to me because I have made some of those exact points on this exact forum. How capitalism needs to be restrained, how easy it is for economic systems and political systems to be confused and conflated. maybe when I get a chance I will watch the rest, the problem is attempting to get the average American to even understand the problem. you can buy off the American voter with a very small tax savings.

Yes, plus your the only one who could understand it & watch the whole thing without falling asleep. LOL

[RoyBacon]

Trump and republicans in general took advantage of Dems moving left. Could an Al Gore or Bill Clinton even be nominated today?

"How capitalism needs to be restrained"

Have any of you libs ever run a business? It's statements like that that are causing your losses.

Todays liberals want to merge socialism and smothering government oversight into a free market economy and that's such a terrible idea.

[khicks26]

Trump and republicans in general took advantage of Dems moving left. Could an Al Gore or Bill Clinton even be nominated today?

"How capitalism needs to be restrained"

Have any of you libs ever run a business? It's statements like that that are causing your losses.

Todays liberals want to merge socialism and smothering government oversight into a free market economy and that's such a terrible idea.

So you would much rather have a merger of the corporate world & the government? Is this what you are trying to say?

[chico2663]

reagan would be classified as a democrat or dino under today's rules.

[RudyRuetigger]

guys this is the national fukkin championship

relax on the fukkin politics

THANKS

[dante1]

Trump and republicans in general took advantage of Dems moving left. Could an Al Gore or Bill Clinton even be nominated today?

"How capitalism needs to be restrained"

Have any of you libs ever run a business? It's statements like that that are causing your losses.

Todays liberals want to merge socialism and smothering government oversight into a free market economy and that's such a terrible idea.

you obviously don't read, just the other day I told you about the businesses I ran and owned. No use attempting to converse with you roy you have preconceived notions and you will learn nothing. As I have said plenty of times, Jesus Christ himself (a far left progressive BTW) could come down and tell you guys that DT is the biggest asshole he ever created and you people would claim Christ was misunderstood.

you don't listen or even read your opponents comments. yes Capitalism does need to be restrained and if it isn't you will get the type of incredible unequal wealth distribution as we have today. the poor aren't lazy Roy, they are fcked and prepetuallly fcked in many instances.
you believe the load of shit the elite R have been preaching for decades concerning trickle down, maybe you know it is BS but don't care. Who the fck knows what you really believe, when I question you, you don't answer.

the other day you spoke about planning, I questioned you and you did not answer. oh WTF is the use.

have a good day.

[chico2663]

So you would much rather have a merger of the corporate world & the government? Is this what you are trying to say?

who started this shit. It was reagan by getting rid of unions,agencies that protected people and getting rid of competition. He did this by allowing companies to buy up competition. But this was really started by trickie dick. On my hillbilly side of family. I had uncle that owned a marathon station. in the 70's he was being sold gas at the same price that the companies stores were selling it. He had to sell his store back to the company and become a lessee just to stay in business. Everyone bitches about carter but he had the same problem that obama had. Which was a do nothing congress. Now repubs can always do this but dems. never do it. It is why trump is able to fill all these judge ships. They were open during obama but mcconnell played hard ball and won.

[RudyRuetigger]

reagan would be classified as a democrat or dino under today's rules.

really shows how dumb you are bro

[dante1]

So you would much rather have a merger of the corporate world & the government? Is this what you are trying to say?

lol, I see you listened. no use my friend, they just don't get it, and never will. you might just as well attempt to teach dwightie or brooks. better luck teaching a frog how to speak English.

[RudyRuetigger]

reagan would be classified as a democrat or dino under today's rules.

heres the key fukkin point

42 seconds

you can watch this one bro

[dante1]

Rudy, you are a good guy, we go way back. however, I don't think you understand the reason Chico made that comment. It isn't because RR was such a flaming liberal it is because the R have turned so far right. And again I don't speak for Chico and I am not attempting to discourage what you believe. I simply think you misunderstood his motives.

[RudyRuetigger]

Rudy, you are a good guy, we go way back. however, I don't think you understand the reason Chico made that comment. It isn't because RR was such a flaming liberal it is because the R have turned so far right. And again I don't speak for Chico and I am not attempting to discourage what you believe. I simply think you misunderstood his motives.

I read what is posted and respond to it

if he wanted to talk in piglatin he should have translated it to English before typing it