This is a guide to exactly how SQUARE you are?

beavis13 · 12-02-17, 03:59 AM

Can't you just tell me so I don't have to hit the link? Just off work and only two hours of drinking left. No time for big reads. Thanks.

19th Hole · 12-02-17, 05:23 AM

jjgold · 12-02-17, 05:29 AM

silly article

All they do is talk about stuff from years ago and so irrelevant

Everyone has hot runs and then they are superstars

Guy today a nobody

19th Hole · 12-02-17, 06:32 AM

Article was from 2013 but interesting how he progressed in his search for the perfect system against ever-shrinking odds.

Ultimate goal of purchasing an NBA team was a moon-shot.

grease lightnin · 12-02-17, 07:12 AM

I have read this article before.

The part that was most interesting to me is where Bob said if they legalize sports betting, a flood of square money will come into the market and give sharp players more of an edge.

jjgold · 12-02-17, 07:38 AM

lines too tight now everywhere

no weakness

It is why everyone gets buried

klemopixx · 12-02-17, 09:19 AM

There's always money to be made. You just have to pick your spots. Most jerkoffs get hot and think they can cap every sport, every night of the week. Focus on the RESULTS! There's holes everywhere, you just have to PAY ATTENTION.

Dan Kelly · 12-02-17, 09:30 AM

Originally posted by beavis13

Can't you just tell me so I don't have to hit the link? Just off work and only two hours of drinking left. No time for big reads. Thanks.

Simply = Supercomputers don't just know the results of the games before they are played, they know who you are going to bet on before you do. Good Luck with that

BoL

Dan Kelly · 12-02-17, 09:41 AM

Originally posted by jjgold

silly article

All they do is talk about stuff from years ago and so irrelevant

Everyone has hot runs and then they are superstars

Guy today a nobody

Coach, if those supercomputers could do that 4 years ago, than today they can take the cash from your wallet before you even open it.

BoL

RangeFinder · 12-02-17, 10:23 AM

I also read this a few years back and can relate to building these computer models. The main thing everyone needs to realize is there will always be adjustments that have to be made. When the books zig, you zag. It is tiresome work.

One thing that I have noticed is that there are so many people building programs like Ewing that the books have somewhat over reacted. It is why you see the average non computer player doing better. The books have got themselves in a position to where the square is getting better numbers than the guys with the computer models. Doesn't seem possible but that is what's happening. They have over adjusted for the fact that humans play these games, not numbers and computer programs. Just my observation.

grease lightnin · 12-02-17, 10:29 AM

This is 100% why I am winning ^^^

It actuallly makes me worried that the market will get flooded with square money.

JohnGalt2341 · 12-02-17, 10:35 AM

Question for anyone who wants to answer... what percent of the people do you consider to be squares?

RangeFinder · 12-02-17, 10:41 AM

Originally posted by JohnGalt2341

Question for anyone who wants to answer... what percent of the people do you consider to be squares?

About 98%

JohnGalt2341 · 12-02-17, 02:00 PM

Originally posted by RangeFinder

About 98%

Sounds about right. But surely the percentage of squares at SBR must be FAR lower. I'm thinking maybe even as low as 97%.

gauchojake · 12-02-17, 02:52 PM

Neural networks are the new wave in caping