If you bet 100 dollars every game on the Giants, Mets, and Tigers this season.....

[stevenash]

If you bet 100 dollars every game on the Giants, Mets, and Tigers this season (money line)
You would have lost a little over 8400 dollars.

Tigers and Giants were the two biggest money burners this season, if you bet 100 a game for the whole season you would have lost exactly 2928 on each.

Mets were the third biggest money burners this season, you would have lost 2645 if you bet them every game for 100.

Who were the most profitable teams in MLB this season in terms of wagering? (every game, money line, 100 dolllars)

Brewers: +1637
Diamondbacks +1343
Rockies +1290
Astros +1197


Which teams were the most profitable this season if you bet 100 dollars on them each HOME game?

Athletics +1303 (they were money at home all season) Oakland was 46-35 at home this season, and they were dogs often too.

Diamondbacks made you +1218 this year if you bet them at home every game.
San Diego Padres made you +1143 if you bet them at home every game.

So, what's the point you say?
When you think of the "power teams" in baseball the SD Padres and Oakland A's are on nobodies list, they're dogs, but betting those dogs at home made you serious bank. And betting the Brews all year paid off handsomely.
Chalk don't pay in the long run, and not all dogs have fleas.

Best road teams wagering wise this past season?

Astros +1437
Nationals +1387 (50-31 straight up road record)
Brewers +1348
Twins +1328

Baltimore Orioles were far and away the worst team to bet on on the road -1798

Only two teams had winning records straight up as an underdog.
Yankees and Indians.
Yanks were underdogs 38 times this season and were 21 and 17 straight up as underdogs.

[pilebuck13]

100 dollars every game la Dodgers ML hit me with the number

[krk1030]

Is this to win 100 or 100 risk?

[stevenash]

Is this to win 100 or 100 risk?

Risk

[stevenash]

100 dollars every game la Dodgers ML hit me with the number

Before I give you the number and the source of my data, give me your best guess.
If you bet the LA Dodgers 100 dollars a game, every game, how much do you think you would have won or lost?

[jjgold]

everything looks easy when season over Nashy

The what if guys

[pilebuck13]

-1100 or so

[stevenash]

-1100 or so

No, the Dodgers won 104 games in the regular season, lost 58.
101 times they won as favorites, Dodger won 3 games as underdogs straight up.
The 104 wins netted you a little over 10,500 dollars, the 58 losses cost you almost 10800.
Dodgers were -243 for the regular season.

If you include the two playoff wins, they are now 106-58 for a negative 43 dollars.

[pilebuck13]

huh interesting got data on the mariners? Just curious

[Waterstpub87]

Makes sense, got killed on sides. Bet the tigers and mets regularly, especially august and September.

[stevenash]

Mariners were bankroll cripplers.

-1083 overall
-881 at home 40 and 41 home record where you are about -140 to -160 faves will kill you
-142 on road

p.s. odds shark has all the data

[jjgold]

Yes the seasons over this irrelevant

I swear I want to slap you just to test how tough you are, I like to do that.

Nashy You can conn guys are something else

I know your type cuz JC crew all the time

[stevenash]

Yes the seasons over this irrelevant

I swear I want to slap you just to test how tough you are, I like to do that.

Nashy You can conn guys are something else

I know your type cuz JC crew all the time

a) the point of the thread is dogs pay in MLB
b) just because I'm an I/T geek doesn't mean I can't dance.
c) I was a scholastic wrestler (besides baseball) I can take down you Newark white boys down in a heartbeat, before your roundhouse misses you're on your back because I took you legs out quicker than your punch lands.

Now my advice coach is to stay on my good side.
We in agreement here, just appreciate my geek side, or suffer the wrath of my bad side.

[jjgold]

I think parity is more prevalent now than ever before and it’s even starting to creep into tennis and soccer.

Talent is so dispersed now and professional and college sports and you need to use that in your handicapping

[Plaza23]

No, the Dodgers won 104 games in the regular season, lost 58.
101 times they won as favorites, Dodger won 3 games as underdogs straight up.
The 104 wins netted you a little over 10,500 dollars, the 58 losses cost you almost 10800.
Dodgers were -243 for the regular season.

If you include the two playoff wins, they are now 106-58 for a negative 43 dollars.

Where you getting you numbers?

The Dodgers were +954 and a ROI of 3.0% in 2017 Straight Up.

http://www.sportsdatabase.com/mlb/query?output=default&su=1&ou=1&sdql=team+%3D+Dodgers+and+season+%3D+2017&submit=++S+D+Q+L+%21++

The only teams better than the Dodgers Straight Up were:

Brewers = $1,789 and ROI 9.9%
Diamondbacks =$1,450 and ROI 6.8%
Astros = $1,337 and ROI 5.3%
Rockies = $1,111 and ROI 5.6%
Twins = $1,020 and ROI 5.5%

http://www.sportsdatabase.com/mlb/query?output=default&su=1&ou=1&sdql=team+and+season+%3D+2017&submit=++S+D+Q+L+%21++

[stevenash]

The two Dodger playoff wins are included in the 106-58 record.
They were 104-58 regular season

Cleveland	104-61	$577	$-220	$797	97-56	6-5	1L
Minnesota	85-78	$787	$-541	$1328	47-32	38-46	1L
Kansas City	80-82	$291	$346	$-55	34-33	46-49	1L
Chi White Sox	67-95	$201	$934	$-733	10-8	57-87	1L
Detroit	64-98	$-2928	$-1788	$-1140	31-34	33-64	1L

Boston	94-72	$-33	$-202	$169	76-53	18-19	1L
NY Yankees	93-73	$167	$516	$-349	72-55	21-17	1W
Tampa Bay	80-82	$-302	$-341	$39	45-43	35-39	4W
Toronto	76-86	$-1079	$-227	$-852	47-44	29-42	1W
Baltimore	75-87	$-1367	$431	$-1798	50-35	25-52	5L

Houston	104-62	$1197	$-240	$1437	100-53	4-9	1W
LA Angels	80-82	$268	$-150	$418	41-35	39-47	1W
Seattle	78-84	$-1023	$-881	$-142	51-34	27-50	1L
Texas	78-84	$47	$-462	$509	36-29	42-55	1L
Oakland	75-87	$-332	$1303	$-1635	37-25	38-62	1W

Chi Cubs	94-71	$-624	$-534	$-90	81-60	13-11	1W
Milwaukee	86-76	$1637	$289	$1348	42-28	43-48	1W
St. Louis	83-79	$-975	$-466	$-509	65-46	18-32	1L
Pittsburgh	75-87	$-921	$266	$-1187	40-36	35-51	2W
Cincinnati	68-94	$-1480	$-328	$-1152	27-26	41-68	1W

Washington	98-67	$684	$-603	$1287	82-49	16-18	1L
Miami	77-85	$-719	$-20	$-699	42-34	35-51	1L
Atlanta	72-90	$-187	$-696	$509	28-30	43-60	1W
NY Mets	70-92	$-2645	$-1371	$-1274	46-41	24-51	1L
Philadelphia	66-96	$-993	$362	$-1355	24-18	42-77	1W

LA Dodgers	106-58	$-43	$387	$-430	103-54	3-4	4W
Arizona	94-71	$1343	$1218	$125	62-41	32-30	2L
Colorado	87-76	$1290	$303	$987	51-40	36-36	3L
San Diego	71-91	$298	$1143	$-845	23-17	48-74	1L
San Francisco	64-98	$-2928	$-514	$-2414	31-44	33-54	1W

[stevenash]

http://www.oddsshark.com/mlb/standings

[JMobile]

I guess I can save this info for next year.

[stevenash]

Where you getting you numbers?

The Dodgers were +954 and a ROI of 3.0% in 2017 Straight Up.

http://www.sportsdatabase.com/mlb/query?output=default&su=1&ou=1&sdql=team+%3D+Dodgers+and+season+%3D+2017&submit=++S+D+Q+L+%21++

The only teams better than the Dodgers Straight Up were:

Brewers = $1,789 and ROI 9.9%
Diamondbacks =$1,450 and ROI 6.8%
Astros = $1,337 and ROI 5.3%
Rockies = $1,111 and ROI 5.6%
Twins = $1,020 and ROI 5.5%

http://www.sportsdatabase.com/mlb/qu...+S+D+Q+L+%21++

If the average Dodger line was -190

164

106-58 (1.20, 64.6%)

-190.4

172.9

+$954

-$1,769

76-76-12 (0.16, 50.0%)

8.2

-$596

-$614

Dodgers

(your source)

-190 x 58 losses = 11020
100 x 104 wins = 10040

For a negative

[TheMoneyShot]

Interesting info Nasher