yes i'm all over that fine state university
+7 for the game.....+4 for the 1st half....in a 3 team teaser.....
WE GOT GAMES
+7 for the game.....+4 for the 1st half....in a 3 team teaser.....
WE GOT GAMES
-
-
State schoolComment -
I posted in a couple threads yesterday to play them at 7.5 or better....7.5 was offered at many shops last night....7 is toughOriginally posted by USCPHILLYGUYyes i'm all over that fine state university
+7 for the game.....+4 for the 1st half....in a 3 team teaser.....
WE GOT GAMESComment -
Minorities (whites) that do not get accepted into UCLA go to USC. USC much easier school to get into.Comment -
Originally posted by funnyb25
SC wanted me so I went......plus only hung out with Asian women my 4 years there
Comment -
SC wants everybodyOriginally posted by USCPHILLYGUY
SC wanted me so I went......plus only hung out with Asian women my 4 years there
Comment -
Originally posted by gauchojake
Comment -
I like UCLA today. Good luck PhillyComment -
Hopefully that jerkoff CWD will check inComment -
Big Card Today Men
457123409-1 9/23/17 1:45pm $107.00 $100.00 Pending 9/23/17 4:00pm Reduced Football 313 Michigan -11 -107* vs Purdue 457123409-2 9/23/17 1:45pm $105.00 $100.00 Pending 9/23/17 7:30pm Reduced Football 318 Iowa +12 -105* vs Penn State 457123409-3 9/23/17 1:45pm $104.00 $100.00 Pending 9/23/17 3:30pm Reduced Football 319 Boston College +33 -104* vs Clemson 457123409-4 9/23/17 1:45pm $300.00 $200.00 Pending 9/23/17 7:00pm Reduced Football 324 Georgia -150* vs Mississippi State 457123409-5 9/23/17 1:45pm $109.00 $100.00 Pending 9/23/17 6:00pm Reduced Football 343 Georgia State +2½ -109* vs Charlotte 457103003-1 9/23/17 12:03pm $300.00 $250.00 Pending 3 Team Teaser (ties lose) T tl 10nfl 10½fb & 7½bk Pending 9/23/17 3:30pm College Football 384 Oklahoma State -½ * vs TCU Pending 9/23/17 6:30pm College Football 401 Oklahoma -17 * vs Baylor Pending 9/23/17 10:30pm College Football 409 UCLA +18 * vs Stanford 457099355-1 9/23/17 11:55am $55.00 $50.00 Pending 9/23/17 3:30pm College Football 379 Alabama 1st Half -11½ -110* vs Vanderbilt 457099355-2 9/23/17 11:55am $55.00 $50.00 Pending 9/23/17 3:30pm College Football 384 Oklahoma State 1st Half -6½ -110* vs TCU 457099355-3 9/23/17 11:55am $52.50 $50.00 Pending 9/23/17 6:30pm College Football 401 Oklahoma 1st Half -17½ -105* vs Baylor 457099355-4 9/23/17 11:55am $230.00 $200.00 Pending 9/23/17 10:30pm College Football 409 UCLA 1st Half +4½ -115* vs Stanford 457099355-5 9/23/17 11:55am $125.00 $100.00 Pending 9/23/17 3:30pm College Football 384 Oklahoma State 1st Quarter -3 -125* vs TCU 457099355-6 9/23/17 11:55am $55.00 $50.00 Pending 9/23/17 3:30pm College Football 379 Alabama 2nd Quarter -6½ -110* vs Vanderbilt 457097541-1 9/23/17 11:51am $101.00 $100.00 Pending 9/23/17 3:30pm Reduced Football 309 Wake Forest -5½ -101* vs Appalachian State 457097541-2 9/23/17 11:51am $105.00 $100.00 Pending 9/23/17 3:30pm Reduced Football 311 Duke/North Carolina Over 60½ -105* 457097541-3 9/23/17 11:51am $105.00 $100.00 Pending 9/23/17 3:30pm Reduced Football 384 Oklahoma State -11 -105* vs TCU 457097541-4 9/23/17 11:51am $214.00 $200.00 Pending 9/23/17 10:30pm Reduced Football 409 UCLA +7 -107* vs Stanford Comment -
SBR Book a fantastic book for usOriginally posted by USCPHILLYGUY
BOL PhillyComment -
funny text me........I'll send you my 5dimes account numberOriginally posted by funnyb25Comment -
Comment -
I know a guy who went to UCSD and he used to say that he went to the University of California (implying that he went to Cal). His reasoning because they were all "Universities of CA" he could say that. We all snickered behind his back.Comment -
I can't afford a cell broOriginally posted by USCPHILLYGUYComment -
Man, sad thing is Stanford is the play
Comment -
good luck brother Thanks for your insightOriginally posted by BcatswinMan, sad thing is Stanford is the playComment -
C'mon Jaker, this is old school thinking..Originally posted by gauchojake
For years now, if someone says they went to the "University of California", without naming a specific school, it doesn't imply they went to Berkeley, it hasn't implied that for many, many years. It doesn't imply anything until they finish the sentence.
Cal Berkeley was originally called University of California, but the name changed once there were multiple Universities. That happened along time ago.
If they want to imply they attended Berkeley, they would call it "Cal," "UC Berkeley," or just "Berkeley."
As a reflection of the University of California's development into a multi-institutional university system, the term University of California is no longer applied to the campus outside of varsity sports; the official name is University of California, Berkeley. Informally, the campus is called UC Berkeley, Berkeley, or Cal. More specifically, the campus uses the terms in the following ways:[32]- "UC Berkeley" is the standard brand name for communications to the general public. The university's current brand identity standards call for "UC Berkeley" to be used in the first reference in any communication.
- "Berkeley" is used in further references in any document in which "UC Berkeley" is used. In addition, according to the campus, "Berkeley is the academic expression of our brand and is used by colleges, schools and departments in official communications."
- "Cal", according to the campus, "is the social expression and pet name for Berkeley. It is used by Cal Athletics, Cal Alumni Association and by development, student organizations and licensed products".
The term University of California has come to refer to the entire University of California system
Sometimes, but more and more rarely, when talking about sports they just say "University of California" to refer to Cal, but that is rare if ever anymore.
It's old school nomenclature but I'm surprised you guys were a part of that old thinking.
At UCLA, we knew the Bruins were a spin off of the Cal Bears and there was always a distinction. Always. Perhaps that wasn't the same for the Gauchos.
Comment -
We all need the game
FUNNY DO NOT FUK USComment -
I'm really just messing around, but this guy was older and used to do it intentionally to mislead people. My wife (UCR Alum) and I always thought it was funny. I just used to tell people I went to UC Santa Barbara and that was the end of it. Of course UCSB is renown for other things not related to the quality education you get, so I never really felt the need to tell people anything other than that.Originally posted by KVBC'mon Jaker, this is old school thinking..
For years now, if someone says they went to the "University of California", without naming a specific school, it doesn't imply they went to Berkeley, it hasn't implied that for many, many years. It doesn't imply anything until they finish the sentence.
Cal Berkeley was originally called University of California, but the name changed once there were multiple Universities. That happened along time ago.
If they want to imply they attended Berkeley, they would call it "Cal," "UC Berkeley," or just "Berkeley."
Sometimes, but more and more rarely, when talking about sports they just say "University of California" to refer to Cal, but that is rare if ever anymore.
It's old school nomenclature but I'm surprised you guys were a part of that old thinking.
At UCLA, we knew the Bruins were a spin off of the Cal Bears and there was always a distinction. Always. Perhaps that wasn't the same for the Gauchos.
I think we may have covered all of the intricacies of the public universities here in CA
Comment -
Originally posted by gauchojake...I think we may have covered all of the intricacies of the public universities here in CA
Yeah, I think we've covered it all.
As far as the game, the stacking forecast, the sharpest I have for NCAAF, has Stanford winning this game with 35 or 38 points to UCLA's 24.
The non predictive public gauge is close with Stanford winning 35-23.
The spread has moved away from the forecast since the early open and the Total is right on it.
The public likes UCLA, perhaps enough to move the line and word is getting out with them.
Personally, I would be careful with a UCLA bet at this stage.
These state schools just cant' get it done.
Comment -
im on Stanford -7Originally posted by KVB
Yeah, I think we've covered it all.
As far as the game, the stacking forecast, the sharpest I have for NCAAF, has Stanford winning this game with 35 or 38 points to UCLA's 24.
The non predictive public gauge is close with Stanford winning 35-23.
The spread has moved away from the forecast since the early open and the Total is right on it.
The public likes UCLA, perhaps enough to move the line and word is getting out with them.
Personally, I would be careful with a UCLA bet at this stage.
These state schools just cant' get it done.
which is good for UCLA bettors today
Comment -
I'm on Stanford -7 and Colorado +11.5 for the late card.Comment -
Let's get it eddy!Originally posted by Eddy MunnyComment -
Yessir... I'm not a fan of Coach Shaw but Stanford should be up for this game after B2B losses and I'm hoping Bryce Love has a field day against that powderpuff defense.Originally posted by Booya711
Comment -
Buy out now!!!!!!!!!!!
listen to the kidComment -
Now!!! Buy out !!!!
trust me
i have a clueComment -
Originally posted by Booya711
Missed that Fl. St. Score. Can you update
Comment -
Buy the fukk out
stanford isn't losing
-260 a steal
cmon gueye
maybe Rosen back door at bestComment -
I'm sitting on Stanford moneyline, everywhere from -270 down to -245.
Comment -
Cuz your sharpOriginally posted by KVBI'm sitting on Stanford moneyline, everywhere from -270 down to -245.
Comment -
Now we gotta put up with this fukking Burns guy at quarterback.
Bad enough I had to overcome Shaw, now this. Game Over.
Comment -
All tied up in Nor CalComment -
Hope Stanford wins by 6 or less
cuz funny the manComment -
Our ballComment
