If you parlay'd $100 against the "Resting" nba teams you would have won $120k

ChuckyTheGoat · 04-08-17, 03:51 PM

We shoulda had it, BigBiz.

BeatTheJerk · 04-08-17, 03:56 PM

Fml another missed opportunity ....

stackz125 · 04-08-17, 04:34 PM

Originally posted by BeatTheJerk

Fml another missed opportunity ....

It's always after the games are finished

jjgold · 04-08-17, 09:36 PM

Originally posted by stackz125

It's always after the games are finished

of course

If you do not do it means nothing

Most never bet dogs and most lose

JaimeMiro · 04-08-17, 11:56 PM

Originally posted by BigBusiness

All the underdogs won today against the "Resting" starters

Atl +1289
Detroit +534
Spurs +180
Phoenix +385

= 120k

IF
and there is the conundrum... most likely scenario is most would take those as singles, if betting on dogs; as one loss is all it takes to turn a monster bet into $0

BennyBigNuts · 04-09-17, 02:06 AM

Originally posted by JaimeMiro

IF
and there is the conundrum... most likely scenario is most would take those as singles, if betting on dogs; as one loss is all it takes to turn a monster bet into $0

Actually round robins would be more likely than straight bets if you're trying to make a little score at least.
If you hit 2 of 4 you come out a good winner.