Where are the Raiders moving to ?
Raiders
Collapse
X
-
RAIDERS7676SBR Rookie
- 10-16-16
- 12
#1RaidersTags: None -
davisca86SBR Hustler
- 03-12-15
- 73
#2I believe it's not set in stone yet.Comment -
DiggityDaggityDoSBR Aristocracy
- 11-30-08
- 81463
#3Took a glance are your previous posts.Originally posted by RAIDERS7676Where are the Raiders moving to ?
Quality stuff!!!Comment -
gauchojakeBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-17-10
- 34131
#4San Diego. The city is suing to keep the Chargers name so they will become the San Diego Chargers, not the San Diego Raiders.Comment -
MickeyManSBR Hall of Famer
- 10-20-09
- 5091
#5Originally posted by RAIDERS7676Where are the Raiders moving to ?
Your name is RAIDERS. You tell usComment -
Dirty SanchezSBR Posting Legend
- 03-01-10
- 16031
#6Who gives a fukOriginally posted by RAIDERS7676Where are the Raiders moving to ?
Comment -
davisca86SBR Hustler
- 03-12-15
- 73
#7I don't see the point in that.Originally posted by gauchojakeSan Diego. The city is suing to keep the Chargers name so they will become the San Diego Chargers, not the San Diego Raiders.Comment -
5mike5SBR Aristocracy
- 09-21-11
- 52138
#8They not be dropping the name that's a factComment -
jjgoldSBR Aristocracy
- 07-20-05
- 388208
#9Vegas outComment -
gauchojakeBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-17-10
- 34131
#10
Comment -
Cuse0323BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-09-09
- 30169
#11Vegas, baby!
I hope so. As a fan across the country. I would much rather go to Vegas to see a game than Oakland.Comment -
sandos139SBR Wise Guy
- 01-27-14
- 569
#12From what I've heard Mark needs to give in and stop being a little bitch. If he doesn't sit down with the city, Oakland cant work on a new stadium, its on him. Hes a greedy Fuker. LV fizzled out as expected, SD will never happen.
So for now, all we know is that we will play in Oak at least 2 more yearsComment -
sandos139SBR Wise Guy
- 01-27-14
- 569
#13looks a little like your avi, one ugly sobOriginally posted by gauchojake
Comment -
grease lightninSBR Posting Legend
- 10-01-12
- 16096
#14That hair cut is the same one Jim Carrey had in Dumb and Dumber.Comment -
BigdaddyQHSBR Posting Legend
- 07-13-09
- 19531
#15If the Raiders are smart (and their front office is far from that) they will move to San Antonio. The city actually wants them, not just some casino owner.Comment -
jjgoldSBR Aristocracy
- 07-20-05
- 388208
#16SD is the fav right nowComment -
DiggityDaggityDoSBR Aristocracy
- 11-30-08
- 81463
#17Just to piss Chargers fans off even more.Originally posted by jjgoldSD is the fav right now
That would be hilarious.Comment -
Notorious_DonkSBR MVP
- 03-29-11
- 2689
#18Originally posted by DiggityDaggityDoTook a glance are your previous posts.
Quality stuff!!!
Comment -
Calgunner23SBR MVP
- 01-06-15
- 1357
#19Like a scorned woman..Originally posted by davisca86I don't see the point in that.Comment -
hostile takeoverSBR MVP
- 12-06-09
- 2259
#20They can move to aleppo for all I careComment -
DiggityDaggityDoSBR Aristocracy
- 11-30-08
- 81463
#21What's a Leppo?Originally posted by hostile takeoverThey can move to aleppo for all I careComment -
Eddy MunnyBenched
- 08-13-13
- 15769
#22I'm hearing Salt Lake City.Comment -
MinnesotaFatsSBR Posting Legend
- 12-18-10
- 14781
#23San Diego. Commissioner put it out there no casino ties. Sands Corp back out...thing unraveling fast.Comment -
swordsandtequilaSBR Hall of Famer
- 02-23-12
- 9763
#24More like Adelson wanted part ownership. The league doesn't give two shits about casino ties, they could build a stadium in the middle of the Venetian if the money was right. The other owners would trip all over themselves for their piece of the expansion fee.Originally posted by MinnesotaFatsSan Diego. Commissioner put it out there no casino ties. Sands Corp back out...thing unraveling fast.Comment -
MinnesotaFatsSBR Posting Legend
- 12-18-10
- 14781
#25Didn't Goodell specifically stated in his "State of the League" speech last week that the NFL will not consider or support any franchises that seek partnerships or equity from gambling or casino linked businesses or stakeholders?Originally posted by swordsandtequilaMore like Adelson wanted part ownership. The league doesn't give two shits about casino ties, they could build a stadium in the middle of the Venetian if the money was right. The other owners would trip all over themselves for their piece of the expansion fee.
I'm pretty sure that was a shot across the bow of Raider Nation.Comment -
swordsandtequilaSBR Hall of Famer
- 02-23-12
- 9763
#26I don't believe anything that comes out of ownerships mouths. At the end of the day money talks.Originally posted by MinnesotaFatsDidn't Goodell specifically stated in his "State of the League" speech last week that the NFL will not consider or support any franchises that seek partnerships or equity from gambling or casino linked businesses or stakeholders?
I'm pretty sure that was a shot across the bow of Raider Nation.Comment -
BigdaddyQHSBR Posting Legend
- 07-13-09
- 19531
#27You are crazy. Absolutely crazy. You do not have a brain in your head. That is how stupid you are. Why would the City take the Raiders when they just turned down the Chargers? Idiot.Originally posted by jjgoldSD is the fav right nowComment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
