Looks like they're a play at +6 and ML, even though - as per usual - they're a dysfunctional mess.
Arch?
Arch?
-
-
Why you think they're the play??Comment -
Chalk for meComment -
yes, check in palComment -
No coin why were they the play?Comment -
if you bet them to once again embarrass themselves, than yesComment -
Looks like Pitt shit the bed againComment -
Louisville up by 50. I have no idea how anyone could have liked Pitt here and I wondered as much well before the game ever started.
Need to understand why no coin thought they were the play.Comment -
Louisville too strong. Best defense in the countryComment -
Why were they the play?Comment -
Hell, Rudy took then SU on the ML in his parlay, ask him...Comment -
Guy got some BIG ballsComment -
No coin went to bedComment -
LB rationale.Originally posted by lakerboy
Glad I didn't trust this sorry ass program. No offense, Arch, but they've screwed me too many times in the past.
This one's an all-timer, though.Comment -
Coin don't blame me here. College line movement is not my thing. Accept your lost and move on pal.Originally posted by No coincidencesComment -
Originally posted by t-wizzleTIME LOU PITT 01/24 06:47 PM -200 +176 01/24 06:46 PM -205 +180 01/24 06:45 PM -210 +184 01/24 06:01 PM -233 +204 01/24 02:39 PM -235 +205 01/24 10:45 AM -250 +218 01/24 10:43 AM -266 +231 01/24 08:20 AM -300 +258
Oh well. They're only down 57. Maybe they'll rally.Comment -
Down 60 points. How is that not a typo?Comment -
Ville backers just hoping the Cards can hold on to the cover lateComment -
What loss?Originally posted by lakerboy
I was asking Arch. He never answered. I steered clear. Didn't see his other thread.Comment -
Lol you just spent the other night ripping LB for going by line movement.Originally posted by No coincidencesComment -
Exactly. And this game proves my point (as does Purdue, Villanova, etc.)Originally posted by t-wizzleComment -
Purdue doesn't prove anything. Public took Sparty there and will lose.Originally posted by No coincidences
Villanova line didn't hardly move and it's only halftime anyway so let's hold off on that one.Comment -
Link?Originally posted by t-wizzleComment -
No coin take it easy on me pal. I did nothing wrong to you.Comment -
Why would the public love a 12-7 borderline NCAA team against a Top-15 opponent who is a total matchup nightmare for them at that line?Comment -
Because it's Michigan State.Originally posted by No coincidences
Why did you ask for a link if you were just not going to believe it anyway?Comment -
I see Purdue 52% at Covers, 59% at sportsplays.com, 53% at oddsshark.com, and 58% at wunderdog.com.Originally posted by t-wizzle
Wonder where scoresandodds gets their numbers?Comment -
Assuming those are just spread numbers. Moneyline probably all over MSU. Again I don't put a ton of stock into these things. It's usually pretty easy to know who the public likes on a game. This game was not slanted that big one way or the other but I'd guess more more people took MSU.Originally posted by No coincidencesComment
