I don't need the points. This pussy ass pats team is weak. They ain't beating the Steelers without gronkowski.
All in on the Steelers ml at ne
Collapse
X
-
lakerboySBR Aristocracy
- 04-02-09
- 94463
#1All in on the Steelers ml at neTags: None -
RudyRuetiggerSBR Aristocracy
- 08-24-10
- 65107
#2ok me tooComment -
frostno98SBR Hall of Famer
- 09-11-07
- 9769
#3Agree. ATL vs Pittsburgh in the Superbowl. Not having Gronk is going to show next week, they got lucky beating a very average QB that was benched.Comment -
BostongamblerBARRELED IN @ SBR!- 02-01-08
- 35628
#4?????!... They bring that field goal kicking offense to Gillette next Sunday and it's Pats by 21Comment -
lakerboySBR Aristocracy
- 04-02-09
- 94463
#5The pats defense is nowhere the level of the chiefs. The Steelers will score at will.Originally posted by Bostongambler?????!... They bring that field goal kicking offense to next Sunday and it's Oats by 22Comment -
BostongamblerBARRELED IN @ SBR!- 02-01-08
- 35628
#6I vote Pats by 7-10 rangeComment -
rizesporSBR MVP
- 06-21-16
- 1900
#7Pats can stop the run though. If Ben plays like shit again pats win going awayOriginally posted by lakerboyThe pats defense is nowhere the level of the chiefs. The Steelers will score at will.Comment -
unde0087BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 03-27-08
- 28998
#8Laker, Steelers aren't much better. They out gained the Chiefs by a huge margin and Bell ran all over them yet needed a holding call on a 2 pt conversion to survive, to a team that has no offense. Now you want to go all in against the Pats, who have a good offense and near invincible at home with Tom Brady?Comment -
KVBSBR Aristocracy
- 05-29-14
- 74866
#9
Comment -
Chi_archieSBR Aristocracy
- 07-22-08
- 63182
#10Pats allowed the lowest amount of points this year, correct?Comment -
BostongamblerBARRELED IN @ SBR!- 02-01-08
- 35628
#11No one scored a passing TD beyond 20 yards.Originally posted by Chi_archiePats allowed the lowest amount of points this year, correct?Comment -
unde0087BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 03-27-08
- 28998
#12Tomlin vs Bill....................hmmmComment -
krk1030SBR Posting Legend
- 08-13-08
- 17610
#13Will be the same thing we just saw, steelers move the ball but cant get TD's.
Except on the other side you have brady instead of alex smith.Comment -
lakerboySBR Aristocracy
- 04-02-09
- 94463
#14Those stats are garbage.
This year
Ravens had the best d.
Then the giants had the best d.
Then the Texans had the best d.
Tonight the chiefs had the best d
The Seahawks had a great d
The Steelers will convert next week. It's a bad omen for the pats that the Steelers didn't score a TD tonight. That will not happen again next week. The pats are finally playing a good team .Comment -
lakerboySBR Aristocracy
- 04-02-09
- 94463
#15Tomlin has won 2 Superbowls vs 1 loss. .667 .Originally posted by unde0087Tomlin vs Bill....................hmmm
Bill is 4-2. Should be 0-6. .667.
Next?Comment -
BostongamblerBARRELED IN @ SBR!- 02-01-08
- 35628
#16Especially the last lineOriginally posted by krk1030Will be the same thing we just saw, steelers move the ball but cant get TD's.
Except on the other side you have brady instead of alex smith.Comment -
BostongamblerBARRELED IN @ SBR!- 02-01-08
- 35628
#17Should be 6-0 actuallyOriginally posted by lakerboyTomlin has won 2 Superbowls vs 1 loss. .667 .
Bill is 4-2. Should be 0-6. .667.
Next?Comment -
unde0087BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 03-27-08
- 28998
#18You could say the same for Pitt.Originally posted by lakerboyThose stats are garbage.
This year
Ravens had the best d.
Then the giants had the best d.
Then the Texans had the best d.
Tonight the chiefs had the best d
The Seahawks had a great d
The Steelers will convert next week. It's a bad omen for the pats that the Steelers didn't score a TD tonight. That will not happen again next week. The pats are finally playing a good team .Comment -
dlowillySBR Posting Legend
- 11-09-16
- 13870
#19Not only will the Patriots abuse the Steelers but Tomlin won't be able to look Belichick in the eye shaking his hand in the middle of the field after the gameComment -
BostongamblerBARRELED IN @ SBR!- 02-01-08
- 35628
#20We are stating facts and eyeball common sense and u are saying it's a bad omen. Ok, good luck with omens.Originally posted by lakerboyThose stats are garbage.
This year
Ravens had the best d.
Then the giants had the best d.
Then the Texans had the best d.
Tonight the chiefs had the best d
The Seahawks had a great d
The Steelers will convert next week. It's a bad omen for the pats that the Steelers didn't score a TD tonight. That will not happen again next week. The pats are finally playing a good team .Comment -
unde0087BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 03-27-08
- 28998
#21At least the Pats won convincingly against a team that has no offense, what is Pitts excuse?Comment -
lakerboySBR Aristocracy
- 04-02-09
- 94463
#22Then why did you take the chiefs?Originally posted by unde0087You could say the same for Pitt.Comment -
Harry N. LloydSBR MVP
- 03-26-08
- 4810
#23Uh, yeah, and let's not forget they had big leads in most games and were vulnerable to 'garbage time' scores. Also they are 14-3 ATS, even having to lay up to 16 points in Playoff games. Trust Belichek, trust Brady, don't trust LakerBoy who already this week told you to go all in on Texans ML and Brooklyn ML, etc. Go with the winners, not the losers.Originally posted by Chi_archiePats allowed the lowest amount of points this year, correct?Comment -
lakerboySBR Aristocracy
- 04-02-09
- 94463
#24Pit was a 2.5 point dog. NE was a 16 point fave. You smoking tonight?Originally posted by unde0087At least the Pats won convincingly against a team that has no offense, what is Pitts excuse?Comment -
BostongamblerBARRELED IN @ SBR!- 02-01-08
- 35628
#25Harry N Lloyd u just went and totally redeemed urself!Originally posted by Harry N. LloydUh, yeah, and let's not forget they had big leads in most games and were vulnerable to 'garbage time' scores. Also they are 14-3 ATS, even having to lay up to 16 points in Playoff games. Trust Belichek, trust Brady, don't trust LakerBoy who already this week told you to go all in on Texans ML and Brooklyn ML, etc. Go with the winners, not the losers.Comment -
unde0087BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 03-27-08
- 28998
#26Because Pitt is who we thought they were and Chiefs let them off the hookOriginally posted by lakerboyThen why did you take the chiefs?Comment -
lakerboySBR Aristocracy
- 04-02-09
- 94463
#27Oh well at least I watched the game.Originally posted by unde0087Because Pitt is who we thought they were and Chiefs let them off the hookComment -
DrunkHorseplayerSBR Hall of Famer
- 05-15-10
- 7720
#28Patriots -6 over the Packers in the Super Bowl.Comment -
frostno98SBR Hall of Famer
- 09-11-07
- 9769
#29Don't look too much in Pitt just kicking field goal. The Steelers knew they were going against a Game Manager offense, so they didn't came out aggressive with Antonio Brown. I think Pitt DB will have an easier time against the Pats white receivers.Comment -
Chi_archieSBR Aristocracy
- 07-22-08
- 63182
#30well I'd like to go ahead and crown them thoughOriginally posted by unde0087Because Pitt is who we thought they were and Chiefs let them off the hookComment -
RudyRuetiggerSBR Aristocracy
- 08-24-10
- 65107
#31lakerboy is fired up and I just learned to not fade when he is like thisComment -
Harry N. LloydSBR MVP
- 03-26-08
- 4810
#33Fade the Pats at your own risk......!Comment -
BostongamblerBARRELED IN @ SBR!- 02-01-08
- 35628
#34Team that has the better game and doesn't turnover the ball will win.Comment -
lakerboySBR Aristocracy
- 04-02-09
- 94463
#35Good luck to all. We are all brothers here. I don't want to fight. I will not fade the Steelers when they haven't lost a game in over 2 months.Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
