This Post season is proving never bet the public side where the $$$$ is

The Giant · 01-09-17, 11:48 PM

In another thread, people are discussing how all the favorites and squares won.

So, basically no one wins. Ever.

jjgold · 01-10-17, 12:14 AM

No such thing as a public bet anymore

Too tough to know with internet betting

Hard to decipher

frostno98 · 01-10-17, 12:50 AM

The public killed the NFL playoffs last year. The only thing saved Vegas was the entire world was on Carolina. In the Superbowl, the public almost always lose.

PAULYPOKER · 01-10-17, 12:59 AM

Originally posted by PAULYPOKER

All the money was on

Clemson=lost Especially the ML

Lol...... WORKS EVERY TIME

Goat Milk · 01-10-17, 02:52 AM

So your data sample is 4 games to justify this conspiracy theory of yours?

Nice sample there Pauly

Goat Milk · 01-10-17, 02:52 AM

So your data sample is 4 games to justify this conspiracy theory of yours?
Nice sample there Pauly

tony_come · 01-10-17, 03:51 AM

We will win

Stop it

triplecrown333 · 01-10-17, 08:00 AM

Does your opinion ever go through a thought process?time and time it's relevant like a third nipple...

PAULYPOKER · 01-10-17, 09:33 AM

Public betting the shit outta KC/GB/and NE............

KC=74% of the $$$$$$
GB=81% of the $$$$$$
NE=79% of the $$$$$$
ATL=73% of the $$$$$

Not near as many betting the Sea/ATL game.....

All the above have 6 figures on them except ATL which only has 5 figures on them...

RetiredinPunta · 01-10-17, 09:56 AM

Originally posted by PAULYPOKER

All the money was on
Detroit= lost.
Miami=lost
New York=lost Especially the ML
Clemson=lost Especially the ML

More $$$ was on Houston but not much $$$$ wagered that game.Only 45k more instead of over a million more like the list above.

clemson won

PAULYPOKER · 01-10-17, 10:11 AM

Post#5

triplecrown333 · 01-10-17, 10:18 AM

lol, i like this guy..

PAULYPOKER · 01-12-17, 07:30 PM

Public really betting shit out of KC.
$697k bet on KC to only $60k on Pitt....
NE $180k to $50k Hou
GB $144k to $36k Dal.

paco · 01-12-17, 08:18 PM

Because of big bens walking boot

DOM_Toretto · 01-12-17, 08:20 PM

I'm seeing NE & GB with 67% of bets but the other two games show basically 50/50 even action.

What's your sources?

gauchojake · 01-12-17, 08:29 PM

So your data sample is 4 games to justify this conspiracy theory of yours?
Nice sample there Pauly

PAULYPOKER · 01-13-17, 02:06 PM

For you guys, yes this is a small sample.

Myself,I have been betting against Public $$$ for many years now.

PAULYPOKER · 01-14-17, 09:53 PM

Originally posted by PAULYPOKER

Not near as many betting the Sea/ATL game.....

Minimum wager data not recorded

PAULYPOKER · 01-15-17, 12:07 AM

74% of the $$$ = $520k more on NE -16.5.
The lowest the ATS got was -15.5.

This is just one book.
NE won........

TheMoneyShot · 01-15-17, 12:39 AM

Originally posted by The Giant

In another thread, people are discussing how all the favorites and squares won.

So, basically no one wins. Ever.

Exactly. Been doing this for 18 years... still trying to figure out how one assumes someone is a SQUARE. And furthermore.... when does someone actually catch the STEAM? Does that make him SHARP if he FADED AWAY? Or is he a SQUARE TO THE PUBLIC?

Just a lot of vocabulary that's practically useless.

TheMoneyShot · 01-15-17, 12:41 AM

Pauly... Is the Public on the Cowboys or the Packers? Hit me on the hotline when you know.

paco · 01-15-17, 12:45 AM

I see 5 to 1 money on Pitt now???

PAULYPOKER · 01-16-17, 09:13 PM

As of 1/14/17
79% of the $$$ or $170k more on GB

GB won

PAULYPOKER · 01-16-17, 09:16 PM

As of 1/13/17
89% of the $$$ or $800k more on KC

Pitt won

Hu$tle · 01-16-17, 09:18 PM

Will this ever shift?

We are all sharp and know to bet dogs bet unders and take points...

do u think the public will ever do the same? imagine if the books changed it up somehow

PAULYPOKER · 01-16-17, 09:36 PM

No, the public will never catch on because it is not 100%
You see. they look for any reason to debunk a system.
However all systems are not bullet proof.
I use this as a strong influence on who I take.

For instance,, my only bet this weekend in the NFL, was Pittsburgh, since there was a staggering amount on KC ATS.....

More $$$ than GB/NE/ and ATL combined.......

PAULYPOKER · 01-19-17, 07:54 AM

People betting the shit outta ATL.. and NE.
If you are not on GB and Pitt. you're gonna lose your ass.......

Books will not get fooled again..............

PAULYPOKER · 01-19-17, 09:03 AM

These 2 dawgs are hot enough to choke the life out of anything in their path........

PAULYPOKER · 01-19-17, 09:07 AM

Belichick is right,he said if they do not play better than they did against lowly Houston, they are gonna lose....

PAULYPOKER · 01-21-17, 09:30 AM

Public $$$$$$ all over ATL and NE......
Books took a bath last week.
The KC $$$ saved them.
I would definitely not bet on NE or ATL this week as the books will not get burnt 2 weeks in a row.

There is 82% or $665,194.00 more on NE's ATS than Pittsburgh..
There is 78% or $652750 more on ATL's ATS than GB.

PAULYPOKER · 01-22-17, 10:43 AM

As of 7:06 AM this morning
There is 76% or $696,843.00 more on NE's ATS than Pittsburgh..

There is 77% or $651,312 .00 more on ATL's ATS than GB.

Who is definitely gonna cover? simple the Dawg with the less line movement.= Pittsburgh

Books are not comfortable with GB covering,so they are adjusting the line to no avail,meaning everyone betting on ATL no matter where the line moves. 7 is a hard number to move to because books could lose on both sides.

Jowframs · 01-22-17, 10:51 AM

A Split they still Win
Falcons/Steelers Bowl

PAULYPOKER · 01-22-17, 05:09 PM

No change in GB/ATL as they did not update since 1/20/17

PAULYPOKER · 01-22-17, 05:16 PM

There is 72% or $901,301.00 more on NE's ATS than Pittsburgh..

Going by GB getting beat with 77% of the $$$$ on ATL....

There is absolutely no chance whatsoever for NE to cover ATS on Pittsburgh........