Anyone on JAX today

Sam Odom · 11-20-16, 04:41 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Some dipshit from JAX jumps offsides anyway. How is that even possible?

sorry

just humans... we are fallible

mngambler · 11-20-16, 04:45 PM

one of the 3 worst teams in the league on the road...'nuff said

No coincidences · 11-20-16, 04:46 PM

Originally posted by mngambler

one of the 3 worst teams in the league on the road...'nuff said

That led for the vast majority of the game and only lost because of two fluke touchdowns.

I'm a Lions fan. They were out-played all day long and had no business winning. None.

b1slickguy · 11-20-16, 04:54 PM

You just got a bad number.
+7 (push) was hanging for a few days at many shops.
Good luck.

mngambler · 11-20-16, 04:55 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

That led for the vast majority of the game and only lost because of two fluke touchdowns.

I'm a Lions fan. They were out-played all day long and had no business winning. None.

bad things happen to bad teams, I just don't see value in betting a dog sh*t team on the road especially when you are getting under a touchdown on the spread...still a tough break though I get it...Lions are looking competitive this year, as a casual Vikes fan it will be cool to see them play on Thanksgiving and actually have the game mean something this time of year

lakerboy · 11-20-16, 04:58 PM

Did you beat the closer?

sweethook · 11-20-16, 04:58 PM

I no that hurts ... but I got lucky there had ..roit city -6

Eddy Munny · 11-20-16, 04:59 PM

Well I got the Jags +7 but it felt like losing because they had every opportunity to cover that number and didn't. The two non-offensive scores, the penalty to keep final Lions drive alive, and the fact that there was just enough time left where Det couldn't run the clock out, and facing a 4th down, basically had to kick the FG for the push.

jazzyj7 · 11-20-16, 04:59 PM

Had them on a 10 point teaser +17 and ML bet.

No coincidences · 11-20-16, 05:01 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

Did you beat the closer?

I had a +6 (+100) locked in three days ago. Closed at +5.5 (-113).

Only +7's I saw were offered at -130 or more juice.

No coincidences · 11-20-16, 05:01 PM

Originally posted by b1slickguy

You just got a bad number.
+7 (push) was hanging for a few days at many shops.
Good luck.

At -130 to -140 juice.

No thanks.

Sam Odom · 11-20-16, 05:02 PM

Originally posted by Eddy Munny

Well I got the Jags +7

good shopping

No coincidences · 11-20-16, 05:06 PM

Originally posted by Sam Odom

good shopping

Not if you're paying a heavy tax for it.

The way this game played out, the +5.5 or +6 covers 999 times out of 1,000. If you watched it, you'd agree.

funnyb25 · 11-20-16, 05:08 PM

Bad beat

Eddy Munny · 11-20-16, 05:11 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

I had a +6 (+100) locked in three days ago. Closed at +5.5 (-113).

Only +7's I saw were offered at -130 or more juice.

What in the world are you talking about?

+7 was available all week long... If you wanted it, it was there for the taking, and no, it wasn't heavily taxed... I bet it at -115 but you could've had -110 depending on when you bet it and at what book.

No coincidences · 11-20-16, 05:12 PM

Originally posted by Eddy Munny

What in the world are you talking about?

+7 was available all week long... If you wanted it, it was there for the taking, and no, it wasn't heavily taxed... I bet it at -115 but you could've had -110 depending on when you bet it and at what book.

"All week long"? Where? What book are you talking about?

rizespor · 11-20-16, 05:16 PM

Blake "pick 6" Bortles

No coincidences · 11-20-16, 05:18 PM

Originally posted by rizespor

Blake "pick 6" Bortles

The interception return for the TD was a total fluke.

stackz125 · 11-20-16, 05:19 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

"All week long"? Where? What book are you talking about?

Bookmaker had it +7 -115
Blowdog at+7 -115

rizespor · 11-20-16, 05:21 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

The interception return for the TD was a total fluke.

I didn't watch it just think it's funny how he keeps throwing them... Well maybe it'd be funnier if I didn't also have jax

Eddy Munny · 11-20-16, 05:29 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

"All week long"? Where? What book are you talking about?

Bookmaker.... It was +7 for a good while before dropping to +6.5. Anything less than that means you probably didn't bet it until this morning or later.

No coincidences · 11-20-16, 05:33 PM

Originally posted by Eddy Munny

Bookmaker.... It was +7 for a good while before dropping to +6.5. Anything less than that means you probably didn't bet it until this morning or later.

It definitely wasn't all week long. You had about 10-15 minutes to get the -110 at open, and it was +7 (-115) for a few hours on Monday. Wasn't available past Tuesday at +7 at better than -120 after that.

Regardless, it shouldn't have mattered. Again, the Lions had no business even winning this game.

Eddy Munny · 11-20-16, 05:41 PM

Yeah, I agree Jags should have covered whatever number was available but I've come to expect this kind of weekly meltdown from them. I had them against the Texans last week, and they lost despite Osweiler throwing for next to nothing. Again it was a pick six and a punt return that set the Texans up with goal to go that ultimately got them the win and the cover. Jax is hot garbage.

YoungGambler · 11-20-16, 06:06 PM

Lul get on that touchdown or nothing baby