Blazer NCAA picks

[daneblazer]

Week 1

Arkansas St -3
Wyoming +10
Penn St -20.5
Clemson -7
Georgia -3
Rice +17

leaning..
ohio st
tennessee
hawaii
SC/Vandy under 42.5

will post others as week goes on

[jjgold]

Lol

Amateur you cannot win betting that many games

Juice will eat you alive

[BIGDAY]

Daner, don't listen to baldy.

Pound the winners.

[reigle9]

Lol

Amateur you cannot win betting that many games

Juice will eat you alive

You seriously can't be this dumb. If you bet 50 games and invest 500 or 1 game and invest 500, it's the same penetrating thing.

[jjgold]

No it is not

More games you bet 🏈-110 worse off you are

[Memento]

somebody needs one of these

[reigle9]

^ Certainly not me.

JJ, are you aware of the concept of diminishing returns? I'm aware of your purpose here, but when literally every one of your posts are ass-backwards garbage, it's time to back 'er down a bit and try to post anything the least bit productive.

[jjgold]

Much easier to hit 56% betting 20 games all year than betting 200 games

I wonder why everyone broke here


Bookies love volume bettors as they cannot lose

[daneblazer]

Much easier to hit 56% betting 20 games all year than betting 200 games

I wonder why everyone broke here


Bookies love volume bettors as they cannot lose

good luck hitting 56% betting 20 games

[reigle9]

good luck hitting 56% betting 20 games

Btw, blazer...only share one game with you. (Clemson) Against you one (UGA).

PSU should cover, but I didn't bet it. It's tough to bet a psu game right now until I see the new O. Wouldn't surprise me if PSU won by 40 and also wouldn't surprise me if the O struggled in the first game. Talent and coaching is there now, but still have to worry about the OL until you don't.

[BigdaddyQH]

OK losers. Here is the way this is going to work. First, yhou will post the name and time of the book you allegedly made your wager with so we can check to see what the real line was, not the line you say you got. This is how I run many arsehole out of here. I am not suggesting that Dane is one of those who would lie about the points he gives/receives, but many inn here are.

Next, if you people think that there is no difference between wagering on 10 games or 100 games, you are f**king crazy. The more you wager, the more chance you have of drifting up or down to the 50% mark, and that is a LOSER. It is a mathematical certainty. If you idiots think you know more than me, put your money where your mouth is.

Dane, you can start by telling us where you got your lines and when, seeing as many of them are off. Set a good example for these fools to follow and we will not have to put with so much B.S. in here. Again, I am not accusing you particularly, but it's about time the losers who try to pull this B.S. start being held accountable or get their arses kicked.

[reigle9]

put your money where your mouth is.

.

OK, mr. internet blowhard.

Btw, it's mathematical theory, not mathematical certainty. Keep trying to prove your fake ass superiority though.

[daneblazer]

Forum was down most of the morning...ill try to
post when I make the bet from here on

Arkansas St -3 got it on Bovada about the same time I posted here but I see it's already moved to -3.5 in most places

Clemson -7 5dimes...circled

UGA is -2.5 most places now

took penn st before I posted but would still take them at -21

Rice is still +17 on Bovada...took them on 5dimes

[jjgold]

Blazer good luck

Track every pick or it means nothing

[reigle9]

uga has been -2.5 forever, i've been waiting on +3 for unc

don't really think you should have to justify yourself anyway, not like you're tout taking these asshole's money

[daneblazer]

uga has been -2.5 forever, i've been waiting on +3 for unc

don't really think you should have to justify yourself anyway, not like you're tout taking these asshole's money

You missed your chance because i took it -3 this morning

it still may be 3 on Bovada. ...kinda expect the public to take Georgia once they figure out Eason and Chubb are starting

[reigle9]

Yeah, same. Saw Chubb was starting today and everyone loves QB hype, so assumed it would go to 3.

[survive]

GL blazer. Interested to hear your ten/app state thoughts...I'm leaning app state

[RudyRuetigger]

jj is spot on here

without a computer model its hard to quantify edge

more games bet equals closer to 50%

[reigle9]

Then why am I up more every year using common sense than the newsletters and other pretentious jagoffs using computer models?

It's 2016, everyone has pretty much the same model as the books.

[RudyRuetigger]

It's 2016, everyone has pretty much the same model as the books.

you are making no sense

[reigle9]

Then you're clueless.

[RudyRuetigger]

Then you're clueless.

everyone has same model as books....its 2016

yea that's why the books open at low limits and move lines with sharp bets

[reigle9]

Yes, the major newsletters have "pretty much" the same model.

Dumbass laugh all you want.

[RudyRuetigger]

look pal, you might win, im not questioning that.

but what you are stating is 100% false

learn from it

[reigle9]

look pal, you might win, im not questioning that.

but what you are stating is 100% false

learn from it

Why are all the newsletters within the same 2-3 points except for the games they pick then? It's not rocket science.

[daneblazer]

People fired up for some football

[cankid]

good stuff!!

[reigle9]

People fired up for some football

I usually just get fired up over stupidity, it's a huge problem of mine.

Tried to not smoke upon waking up today, just not in the cards.

[maggiethebestdog]

OK losers. Here is the way this is going to work. First, yhou will post the name and time of the book you allegedly made your wager with so we can check to see what the real line was, not the line you say you got. This is how I run many arsehole out of here. I am not suggesting that Dane is one of those who would lie about the points he gives/receives, but many inn here are.

Next, if you people think that there is no difference between wagering on 10 games or 100 games, you are f**king crazy. The more you wager, the more chance you have of drifting up or down to the 50% mark, and that is a LOSER. It is a mathematical certainty. If you idiots think you know more than me, put your money where your mouth is.

Dane, you can start by telling us where you got your lines and when, seeing as many of them are off. Set a good example for these fools to follow and we will not have to put with so much B.S. in here. Again, I am not accusing you particularly, but it's about time the losers who try to pull this B.S. start being held accountable or get their arses kicked.

I looked for all your picks with the same requirements you want from others. Big surprise they aren't there.

[RudyRuetigger]

Why are all the newsletters within the same 2-3 points except for the games they pick then? It's not rocket science.

everyone has same model as books....its 2016

yea that's why the books open at low limits and move lines with sharp bets

...

[ChuckyTheGoat]

Lol

Amateur you cannot win betting that many games

Juice will eat you alive

Blazer, have a big year. Don't listen to this hamburger.

[ChuckyTheGoat]

Much easier to hit 56% betting 20 games all year than betting 200 games

I wonder why everyone broke here


Bookies love volume bettors as they cannot lose

Repeat. Blah-blah, blah.

[unde0087]

This reigle9 guy is more fired up then Sandusky for a hot shower with a 10 year old. Guy is ready to go

[reigle9]

This reigle9 guy is more fired up then Sandusky for a hot shower with a 10 year old. Guy is ready to go

Great reply. Tells me how dumb you are.

What exactly am I fired up about?