Nationals only - 129 again tomorrow vs Twinkies? What gives?

[Bigdave117]

You have the second best team in the league facing one of the absolute worst.


Does Vegas just not believe in the nationals or do they think Minnesota is a lot better than their record? I can't make any sense of this. I figured all the games in this series would be - 200 Nationals

[jjgold]

looks too easy Davey

[PorkChop]

Like the under here

[pavyracer]

Did you know that good teams with 100 wins per year still find a way to lose 62 games every year?

[Bigdave117]

Did you know that good teams with 100 wins per year still find a way to lose 62 games every year?

True but it's generally higher winning percentage than that in home games against terrible opponents

And even at that percentage, this is a decent bet

[Bigdave117]

Bump

[jjgold]

Dave POUND IT

[Smoke]

The odds makers know more than us

[posey_mvp]

Just from looking at the line movement, looks like the smart money is coming in on Minn.. I would thread lightly..

[stealthyburrito]

Tanner Roark blows

[jjgold]

line sinking

[Bigdave117]

Tanner Roark blows

So does Phil hughes

[Ra77er]

I like twins in cruel intentions 2 only, very bad in the shining.

[Smoke]

So does Phil hughes

Thus the short line

[LT Profits]

Hughes is much better than Roark and Twins are not that bad. I am only on the Under though.

[NardVa]

I need more value to back a team as bad as Minny.

[Ra77er]

If you like the Under then Hugs is the play. If he keeps it in the field then they got a good chance...plus its interleague always have to look AL first. Twins are interleague straight killers with 57%ish win rate all time.

[LT Profits]

I need more value to back a team as bad as Minny.

I am not saying there is any value, but Minny is not a bad team. They'll be hovering around .500 at the end of the year.

[Bigdave117]

Hughes is much better than Roark and Twins are not that bad. I am only on the Under though.

Twins are a 75 win team, nats are a 95 win team. Line should be -180 to 200

[PorkChop]

I am not saying there is any value, but Minny is not a bad team. They'll be hovering around .500 at the end of the year.

Also have the next superstar in Byron Buxton. Will be household by end of year.

[Chi_archie]

Also have the next superstar in Byron Buxton. Will be household by end of year.

he better learn to cut down on strike outs, he has struck out 20 times in 40 ab's

[Bigdave117]

Also have the next superstar in Byron Buxton. Will be household by end of year.

Next superstar my ass. His stats have been beyond atrocious. Dude is completely overmatched by mlb pitching

[CanuckG]

Nats -116?? Watch them lose.

[RavensFan2k3]

Nats -116?? Watch them lose.

Hope so

[jjgold]

Nats on paper

[NardVa]

This game is over by the 3rd...Nats -1.5 is easy money...

[19th Hole]

TANNER ROARK HAS 12 K'S THROUGH 4+ INNINGS


The Nationals pitcher has struck out each member of the Twins lineup at least once already this afternoon.

[Smoke]

TANNER ROARK HAS 12 K'S THROUGH 4+ INNINGS


The Nationals pitcher has struck out each member of the Twins lineup at least once already this afternoon.

Your joking right?

[smoke a bowl]

You have the second best team in the league facing one of the absolute worst.


Does Vegas just not believe in the nationals or do they think Minnesota is a lot better than their record? I can't make any sense of this. I figured all the games in this series would be - 200 Nationals

Vegas doesn't do anything but follow offshore.

[stealthyburrito]

Just as we thought...Roark with 14Ks through 6

[jjgold]

unreal

easy winner

good call Dave

[Bigdave117]

Cy young Roark

[jjgold]

BigDave you got a clue

[No coincidences]

Nats -116?? Watch them lose.

Dumbest line of the year. Hands down.

No. 2 was Dodgers -117 tonight.

Free $$$$