Bears season win total -7 ?!?!

Snowball · 09-01-15, 03:29 PM

i agree, Bears look strong.. should get off to a decent start.

tatddy · 09-01-15, 03:37 PM

He means under 7, Snowball. And if you think the Bears look "strong" you can get +225 on them finishing .500 or better this year.

To the OP...having a huge limit with a local is the only logical way you can lay -200 on any future at all since your money wouldn't actually be tied up for half a year.

Snowball · 09-01-15, 03:40 PM

Bears ready to roll.. you will be surprised.

tatddy · 09-01-15, 03:41 PM

PS if I had to play a wins future, which I wont, I'd take the Rams over 7.5/8 depending on weather you want +150 or even money.

tatddy · 09-01-15, 03:42 PM

Originally posted by Snowball

Bears ready to roll.. you will be surprised.

I have no opinion. Was just pointing out that you misinterpreted his post.

Snowball · 09-01-15, 03:44 PM

Originally posted by tatddy

I have no opinion. Was just pointing out that you misinterpreted his post.

I am surprised at that line. Looking at it now.
Who couldn't think of better bets than laying -200
that Chicago won't win 7 of 16 games ?

trytrytry · 09-01-15, 03:46 PM

5 wins for bears, easy under

jjgold · 09-01-15, 11:58 PM

Maybe Cutler will have a good year and surprises all but I doubt it I think the best the Bears can do a 7–9

Kermit · 09-02-15, 12:00 AM

Originally posted by trytrytry

5 wins for bears, easy under

I think they squeak out 6 with some goofy shit at the end of a game.

TheMoneyShot · 09-02-15, 12:01 AM

Some sharps must of smoked that UNDER? Don't recall ever seeing an Under at -200 on any WIN/LOSS record before. WOW.

Kermit · 09-02-15, 12:02 AM

Originally posted by TheMoneyShot

Some sharps must of smoked that UNDER? Don't recall ever seeing an Under at -200 on any WIN/LOSS record before. WOW.

You would think it would drop to 6.5 before that kind of juice.

newguy · 09-02-15, 06:26 AM

Originally posted by Kermit

You would think it would drop to 6.5 before that kind of juice.

They will leave it there. Last year o/u was 8 I believe and it was over -300 at one point. They just suckered all the money on the over but books wouldn't move higher because of concerns of people coming back and hammering under. Same thing here. 7 is a good number. 6.5 and you put 7-9 a winning record instead of push. Books don't see Bears getting 8 so they can just keep juicing it to try and entice people to the over. Worst case for them they push but held all that money for 4 months.

Starters didn't score a Td in pre season. I'm huge Bears fan but this year may be harder to watch than last year and last year sucked.